博士后论文的发表和引用与学术保留和教职员工的成功有关。

IF 9.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yueran Duan,Shahan Ali Memon,Bedoor AlShebli,Qing Guan,Petter Holme,Talal Rahwan
{"title":"博士后论文的发表和引用与学术保留和教职员工的成功有关。","authors":"Yueran Duan,Shahan Ali Memon,Bedoor AlShebli,Qing Guan,Petter Holme,Talal Rahwan","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2402053122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postdoctoral training is a career stage often described as a demanding and anxiety-laden time when many promising PhDs see their academic dreams slip away due to circumstances beyond their control. We use a unique dataset of academic publishing and careers to chart the more or less successful postdoctoral paths. We build a measure of academic success on the citation patterns two to five years into a faculty career. Then, we monitor how students' postdoc positions-in terms of relocation, change of topic, and early well-cited papers-relate to their early-career success. One key finding is that the postdoc period seems more important than the doctoral training to achieve this form of success. This is especially interesting in light of the many studies of academic faculty hiring that link Ph.D. granting institutions and hires, omitting the postdoc stage. Another group of findings can be summarized as a Goldilocks principle: It seems beneficial to change one's direction, but not too much.","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"107 1","pages":"e2402053122"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postdoc publications and citations link to academic retention and faculty success.\",\"authors\":\"Yueran Duan,Shahan Ali Memon,Bedoor AlShebli,Qing Guan,Petter Holme,Talal Rahwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1073/pnas.2402053122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Postdoctoral training is a career stage often described as a demanding and anxiety-laden time when many promising PhDs see their academic dreams slip away due to circumstances beyond their control. We use a unique dataset of academic publishing and careers to chart the more or less successful postdoctoral paths. We build a measure of academic success on the citation patterns two to five years into a faculty career. Then, we monitor how students' postdoc positions-in terms of relocation, change of topic, and early well-cited papers-relate to their early-career success. One key finding is that the postdoc period seems more important than the doctoral training to achieve this form of success. This is especially interesting in light of the many studies of academic faculty hiring that link Ph.D. granting institutions and hires, omitting the postdoc stage. Another group of findings can be summarized as a Goldilocks principle: It seems beneficial to change one's direction, but not too much.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"e2402053122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402053122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402053122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

博士后培训是一个职业生涯的阶段,通常被描述为一个要求很高、充满焦虑的阶段,在这个阶段,许多有前途的博士看到他们的学术梦想由于他们无法控制的情况而溜走。我们使用一个独特的学术出版和职业数据集来绘制或多或少成功的博士后路径。我们根据教师职业生涯两到五年的引文模式建立学术成功的衡量标准。然后,我们监测学生的博士后职位——从搬迁、主题变化和早期被广泛引用的论文方面——与他们早期职业成功的关系。一个关键的发现是,要获得这种形式的成功,博士后时期似乎比博士培训更重要。考虑到许多将授予博士学位的机构和聘用人员联系起来的学术教师招聘研究(忽略了博士后阶段),这一点尤其有趣。另一组研究结果可以概括为一个金凤花原则:改变一个人的方向似乎是有益的,但不要太多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postdoc publications and citations link to academic retention and faculty success.
Postdoctoral training is a career stage often described as a demanding and anxiety-laden time when many promising PhDs see their academic dreams slip away due to circumstances beyond their control. We use a unique dataset of academic publishing and careers to chart the more or less successful postdoctoral paths. We build a measure of academic success on the citation patterns two to five years into a faculty career. Then, we monitor how students' postdoc positions-in terms of relocation, change of topic, and early well-cited papers-relate to their early-career success. One key finding is that the postdoc period seems more important than the doctoral training to achieve this form of success. This is especially interesting in light of the many studies of academic faculty hiring that link Ph.D. granting institutions and hires, omitting the postdoc stage. Another group of findings can be summarized as a Goldilocks principle: It seems beneficial to change one's direction, but not too much.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信