骨-髌腱-骨与腘绳肌腱自体移植物重建初级前交叉韧带后恢复运动和移植物失败率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

John Patrick Connors,Antonio Cusano,Jayson Saleet,Kevin A Hao,Kristian Efremov,Robert L Parisien,Romain Seil,Xinning Li
{"title":"骨-髌腱-骨与腘绳肌腱自体移植物重建初级前交叉韧带后恢复运动和移植物失败率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"John Patrick Connors,Antonio Cusano,Jayson Saleet,Kevin A Hao,Kristian Efremov,Robert L Parisien,Romain Seil,Xinning Li","doi":"10.1177/03635465241295713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequent injuries in athletes that often require surgical reconstruction so that patients may return to their previous levels of performance. While existing data on patient-reported outcomes are similar between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the literature regarding return to sport (RTS), return to previous levels of sport activity, and graft failure rate remains limited.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo compare rates of RTS, return to previous activity levels, and graft retears among athletes undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a BTB versus HT autograft.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nSystematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried, and studies reporting on RTS after primary ACL reconstruction using a BTB or HT autograft were included. Exclusion criteria included revision reconstruction, ACL repair, quadriceps tendon autografts, allografts, graft augmentation, or double-bundle autografts. Rates of RTS, return to previous levels of activity, and retears were extracted and analyzed across included studies.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 33 articles met inclusion criteria, with a patient cohort of 4810 athletes. The overall RTS rate for all athletes was 80.4% (95% CI, 75.3%-84.6%) at a mean follow-up of 35.7 months, with 54.6% (95% CI, 48.5%-60.6%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. No significant difference was found between BTB and HT autografts with respect to rates of RTS, return to preinjury activity levels, or reruptures. The overall RTS rate in patients after primary ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft was 83.3% (95% CI, 77.0%-88.2%), with 56.1% (95% CI, 49.3%-62.7%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. Conversely, the overall RTS rate in patients after primary ACL reconstruction with an HT autograft was 77.9% (95% CI, 70.3%-84.0%), with 53.5% (95% CI, 42.8%-63.9%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. The overall graft rerupture rate for the entire patient cohort was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.5%-5.1%), for patients with BTB grafts was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-5.3%), and for patients with HT grafts was 4.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-6.8%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPrimary ACL reconstruction using BTB autografts demonstrated similar rates of RTS, return to previous activity levels, and reruptures compared with reconstruction using HT autografts.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"3635465241295713"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to Sport and Graft Failure Rates After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"John Patrick Connors,Antonio Cusano,Jayson Saleet,Kevin A Hao,Kristian Efremov,Robert L Parisien,Romain Seil,Xinning Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241295713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequent injuries in athletes that often require surgical reconstruction so that patients may return to their previous levels of performance. While existing data on patient-reported outcomes are similar between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the literature regarding return to sport (RTS), return to previous levels of sport activity, and graft failure rate remains limited.\\r\\n\\r\\nPURPOSE\\r\\nTo compare rates of RTS, return to previous activity levels, and graft retears among athletes undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a BTB versus HT autograft.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\r\\nSystematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried, and studies reporting on RTS after primary ACL reconstruction using a BTB or HT autograft were included. Exclusion criteria included revision reconstruction, ACL repair, quadriceps tendon autografts, allografts, graft augmentation, or double-bundle autografts. Rates of RTS, return to previous levels of activity, and retears were extracted and analyzed across included studies.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 33 articles met inclusion criteria, with a patient cohort of 4810 athletes. The overall RTS rate for all athletes was 80.4% (95% CI, 75.3%-84.6%) at a mean follow-up of 35.7 months, with 54.6% (95% CI, 48.5%-60.6%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. No significant difference was found between BTB and HT autografts with respect to rates of RTS, return to preinjury activity levels, or reruptures. The overall RTS rate in patients after primary ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft was 83.3% (95% CI, 77.0%-88.2%), with 56.1% (95% CI, 49.3%-62.7%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. Conversely, the overall RTS rate in patients after primary ACL reconstruction with an HT autograft was 77.9% (95% CI, 70.3%-84.0%), with 53.5% (95% CI, 42.8%-63.9%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. The overall graft rerupture rate for the entire patient cohort was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.5%-5.1%), for patients with BTB grafts was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-5.3%), and for patients with HT grafts was 4.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-6.8%).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nPrimary ACL reconstruction using BTB autografts demonstrated similar rates of RTS, return to previous activity levels, and reruptures compared with reconstruction using HT autografts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"3635465241295713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241295713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241295713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂是运动员中常见的损伤,通常需要手术重建,以便患者恢复到以前的表现水平。虽然现有的患者报告的骨-髌腱-骨(BTB)和腘绳肌腱(HT)自体移植物的结果相似,但关于恢复运动(RTS)、恢复先前运动水平和移植物失败率的文献仍然有限。目的比较使用BTB和HT自体移植物进行初级ACL重建的运动员的RTS、恢复到先前活动水平和移植物撕裂率。研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析;证据等级,4级。方法查询MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,纳入使用BTB或HT自体移植物重建初级ACL后RTS的研究报告。排除标准包括翻修重建、前交叉韧带修复、股四头肌腱自体移植物、同种异体移植物、移植物增强或双束自体移植物。在纳入的研究中提取并分析RTS、恢复到先前活动水平和眼泪的比率。结果共纳入33篇符合纳入标准的文献,患者队列为4810名运动员。在平均35.7个月的随访中,所有运动员的总体RTS率为80.4% (95% CI, 75.3%-84.6%),其中54.6% (95% CI, 48.5%-60.6%)恢复到损伤前的活动水平。BTB和HT自体移植物在RTS、恢复损伤前活动水平或再发率方面无显著差异。自体BTB自体移植物重建初次ACL后,患者的总体RTS率为83.3% (95% CI, 77.0%-88.2%), 56.1% (95% CI, 49.3%-62.7%)恢复到损伤前的活动水平。相反,自体HT自体移植物重建初次ACL后患者的总体RTS率为77.9% (95% CI, 70.3%-84.0%),其中53.5% (95% CI, 42.8%-63.9%)恢复到损伤前的活动水平。整个患者队列的总体移植物再破裂率为3.6% (95% CI, 2.5%-5.1%), BTB移植物患者的总体移植物再破裂率为3.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-5.3%), HT移植物患者的总体移植物再破裂率为4.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-6.8%)。结论:与自体HT移植重建相比,自体BTB移植重建原发性ACL具有相似的RTS、恢复到先前活动水平和再爆发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return to Sport and Graft Failure Rates After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequent injuries in athletes that often require surgical reconstruction so that patients may return to their previous levels of performance. While existing data on patient-reported outcomes are similar between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the literature regarding return to sport (RTS), return to previous levels of sport activity, and graft failure rate remains limited. PURPOSE To compare rates of RTS, return to previous activity levels, and graft retears among athletes undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a BTB versus HT autograft. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried, and studies reporting on RTS after primary ACL reconstruction using a BTB or HT autograft were included. Exclusion criteria included revision reconstruction, ACL repair, quadriceps tendon autografts, allografts, graft augmentation, or double-bundle autografts. Rates of RTS, return to previous levels of activity, and retears were extracted and analyzed across included studies. RESULTS A total of 33 articles met inclusion criteria, with a patient cohort of 4810 athletes. The overall RTS rate for all athletes was 80.4% (95% CI, 75.3%-84.6%) at a mean follow-up of 35.7 months, with 54.6% (95% CI, 48.5%-60.6%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. No significant difference was found between BTB and HT autografts with respect to rates of RTS, return to preinjury activity levels, or reruptures. The overall RTS rate in patients after primary ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft was 83.3% (95% CI, 77.0%-88.2%), with 56.1% (95% CI, 49.3%-62.7%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. Conversely, the overall RTS rate in patients after primary ACL reconstruction with an HT autograft was 77.9% (95% CI, 70.3%-84.0%), with 53.5% (95% CI, 42.8%-63.9%) returning to preinjury levels of activity. The overall graft rerupture rate for the entire patient cohort was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.5%-5.1%), for patients with BTB grafts was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-5.3%), and for patients with HT grafts was 4.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-6.8%). CONCLUSION Primary ACL reconstruction using BTB autografts demonstrated similar rates of RTS, return to previous activity levels, and reruptures compared with reconstruction using HT autografts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信