农民采用绿色生产技术是否有助于减轻家庭生计脆弱性?——基于《中国土地经济调查》

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Weili Zhu , Xinmin Huang , Jianghua Chen , Kai Chen
{"title":"农民采用绿色生产技术是否有助于减轻家庭生计脆弱性?——基于《中国土地经济调查》","authors":"Weili Zhu ,&nbsp;Xinmin Huang ,&nbsp;Jianghua Chen ,&nbsp;Kai Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing upon the Sustainable Livelihood Framework, this study utilizes the 2022 Chinese land economic survey data to examine the impact of six green production technologies—soil subsoiling, soil testing formulated fertilization, organic manure application, low-toxic pesticide application, pesticide packaging recycling, and agricultural film recycling—on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. The findings indicate that the adoption of green production technologies can significantly mitigate the farmers' household vulnerability in general, with a greater number of adopted technologies leading to a lower level of livelihood vulnerability. However, heterogeneity exists in the mitigating effects of different green production technologies on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. Specifically, organic manure application, low-toxic pesticide application, and pesticide package recycling demonstrate significant potential to mitigate farmers' household livelihood vulnerability, while soil subsoiling, soil testing formulated fertilization, and agricultural film recycling have insignificant impacts on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. Additionally, in the context of the impact of adopting green production technologies on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability, agricultural production efficiency and socialized services play significant roles as a partial mediating factor and a positive moderator, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"491 ","pages":"Article 144824"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does farmers' adoption of green production technologies help mitigate household livelihood vulnerability? ——Based on China land economic survey\",\"authors\":\"Weili Zhu ,&nbsp;Xinmin Huang ,&nbsp;Jianghua Chen ,&nbsp;Kai Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Drawing upon the Sustainable Livelihood Framework, this study utilizes the 2022 Chinese land economic survey data to examine the impact of six green production technologies—soil subsoiling, soil testing formulated fertilization, organic manure application, low-toxic pesticide application, pesticide packaging recycling, and agricultural film recycling—on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. The findings indicate that the adoption of green production technologies can significantly mitigate the farmers' household vulnerability in general, with a greater number of adopted technologies leading to a lower level of livelihood vulnerability. However, heterogeneity exists in the mitigating effects of different green production technologies on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. Specifically, organic manure application, low-toxic pesticide application, and pesticide package recycling demonstrate significant potential to mitigate farmers' household livelihood vulnerability, while soil subsoiling, soil testing formulated fertilization, and agricultural film recycling have insignificant impacts on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. Additionally, in the context of the impact of adopting green production technologies on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability, agricultural production efficiency and socialized services play significant roles as a partial mediating factor and a positive moderator, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"491 \",\"pages\":\"Article 144824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262500174X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262500174X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于可持续生计框架,本研究利用2022年中国土地经济调查数据,考察了土壤深埋、土壤试验配方施肥、有机肥施用、低毒农药施用、农药包装回收和农膜回收6种绿色生产技术对农户生计脆弱性的影响。研究结果表明,采用绿色生产技术总体上能显著缓解农户生计脆弱性,采用绿色生产技术数量越多,农户生计脆弱性水平越低。但不同绿色生产技术对农户生计脆弱性的缓解效果存在异质性。其中,有机肥施用、低毒农药施用和农药包装回收对农户生计脆弱性的影响显著,土壤深埋、土壤试验配方施肥和农膜回收对农户生计脆弱性的影响不显著。此外,在采用绿色生产技术对农户生计脆弱性影响的背景下,农业生产效率和社会化服务分别发挥了显著的部分中介作用和显著的正向调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does farmers' adoption of green production technologies help mitigate household livelihood vulnerability? ——Based on China land economic survey

Does farmers' adoption of green production technologies help mitigate household livelihood vulnerability? ——Based on China land economic survey

Does farmers' adoption of green production technologies help mitigate household livelihood vulnerability? ——Based on China land economic survey
Drawing upon the Sustainable Livelihood Framework, this study utilizes the 2022 Chinese land economic survey data to examine the impact of six green production technologies—soil subsoiling, soil testing formulated fertilization, organic manure application, low-toxic pesticide application, pesticide packaging recycling, and agricultural film recycling—on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. The findings indicate that the adoption of green production technologies can significantly mitigate the farmers' household vulnerability in general, with a greater number of adopted technologies leading to a lower level of livelihood vulnerability. However, heterogeneity exists in the mitigating effects of different green production technologies on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. Specifically, organic manure application, low-toxic pesticide application, and pesticide package recycling demonstrate significant potential to mitigate farmers' household livelihood vulnerability, while soil subsoiling, soil testing formulated fertilization, and agricultural film recycling have insignificant impacts on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability. Additionally, in the context of the impact of adopting green production technologies on farmers' household livelihood vulnerability, agricultural production efficiency and socialized services play significant roles as a partial mediating factor and a positive moderator, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信