入侵性害虫和病原体是城市森林分配不平等和不公平的潜在驱动因素

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Alexander J.F. Martin, Tenley M. Conway
{"title":"入侵性害虫和病原体是城市森林分配不平等和不公平的潜在驱动因素","authors":"Alexander J.F. Martin, Tenley M. Conway","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental injustices are influenced by socio-political and environmental legacies. Urban forest inequalities and inequities are often attributed to drivers like systemic racism and segregation. However, in recent decades, invasive pests and pathogens have substantially changed urban forests. It is not known how these invasive pests and pathogens act as a driver of urban forest inequalities and inequities. At the western range of Dutch elm disease (<ce:italic>Ophiostoma</ce:italic> spp.) and emerald ash borer (<ce:italic>Agrilus planipennis</ce:italic>), we examined how the loss of localized street tree monocultures of elm (<ce:italic>Ulmus</ce:italic> spp.) and ash (<ce:italic>Fraxinus</ce:italic> spp.) will result in changes to distributional justice. We examined street tree count and basal area distributions, applying the Gini Index and spatial autoregression to measure inequality and inequity, respectively, under current conditions and hypothetical pest-induced loss scenarios. Findings reveal that DED-related elm losses could improve distributional equality, likely due to the high density of elm in already greener areas, while EAB-related losses of ash could increase inequalities. Street tree losses to both DED and EAB dampen the magnitude of distributional inequities, but the inequities remain present in areas of high residential instability, economic dependency, and ethno-cultural composition. Our results indicate that pest-induced urban forest losses do not merely reduce canopy cover but may reshape distributional equality and equity in ways that align with socioeconomic disparities. This research highlights the need to incorporate principles of environmental justice in pest management approaches and replanting efforts, particularly prioritizing systemically marginalized communities. These findings underscore the critical role of diversity and strategic planning in urban forest resilience, advocating for practices that mitigate the social and ecological impacts of invasive pests and pathogens.","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invasive pests and pathogens as potential drivers of urban forest distributional inequalities and inequities\",\"authors\":\"Alexander J.F. Martin, Tenley M. Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental injustices are influenced by socio-political and environmental legacies. Urban forest inequalities and inequities are often attributed to drivers like systemic racism and segregation. However, in recent decades, invasive pests and pathogens have substantially changed urban forests. It is not known how these invasive pests and pathogens act as a driver of urban forest inequalities and inequities. At the western range of Dutch elm disease (<ce:italic>Ophiostoma</ce:italic> spp.) and emerald ash borer (<ce:italic>Agrilus planipennis</ce:italic>), we examined how the loss of localized street tree monocultures of elm (<ce:italic>Ulmus</ce:italic> spp.) and ash (<ce:italic>Fraxinus</ce:italic> spp.) will result in changes to distributional justice. We examined street tree count and basal area distributions, applying the Gini Index and spatial autoregression to measure inequality and inequity, respectively, under current conditions and hypothetical pest-induced loss scenarios. Findings reveal that DED-related elm losses could improve distributional equality, likely due to the high density of elm in already greener areas, while EAB-related losses of ash could increase inequalities. Street tree losses to both DED and EAB dampen the magnitude of distributional inequities, but the inequities remain present in areas of high residential instability, economic dependency, and ethno-cultural composition. Our results indicate that pest-induced urban forest losses do not merely reduce canopy cover but may reshape distributional equality and equity in ways that align with socioeconomic disparities. This research highlights the need to incorporate principles of environmental justice in pest management approaches and replanting efforts, particularly prioritizing systemically marginalized communities. These findings underscore the critical role of diversity and strategic planning in urban forest resilience, advocating for practices that mitigate the social and ecological impacts of invasive pests and pathogens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境不公正受到社会政治和环境遗产的影响。城市森林的不平等和不平等通常归因于系统性种族主义和种族隔离等驱动因素。然而,近几十年来,入侵的害虫和病原体已经大大改变了城市森林。目前尚不清楚这些入侵性害虫和病原体如何成为城市森林不平等和不公平的驱动因素。在荷兰榆树病(Ophiostoma spp.)和绿灰螟(Agrilus planipennis)的西部范围,我们研究了榆树(Ulmus spp.)和灰树(Fraxinus spp.)的局部街道树木单一栽培的丧失将如何导致分布正义的变化。研究人员利用基尼指数(Gini Index)和空间自回归(spatial autoregression)分别考察了当前条件下和假设虫害造成的损失情景下的街道树木数量和基础面积分布。研究结果表明,与干旱相关的榆树损失可能会改善分布平等,这可能是由于榆树在已经绿化的地区密度很高,而与干旱相关的白蜡树损失可能会增加不平等。街道树木对DED和EAB的损失抑制了分配不平等的程度,但不平等仍然存在于住宅高度不稳定、经济依赖和民族文化构成的地区。我们的研究结果表明,虫害引起的城市森林损失不仅减少了林冠覆盖,而且可能以与社会经济差距相一致的方式重塑分配的平等和公平。这项研究强调需要将环境正义原则纳入有害生物管理方法和重新种植工作,特别是优先考虑系统边缘化社区。这些发现强调了多样性和战略规划在城市森林恢复力中的关键作用,倡导采取措施减轻入侵害虫和病原体的社会和生态影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Invasive pests and pathogens as potential drivers of urban forest distributional inequalities and inequities
Environmental injustices are influenced by socio-political and environmental legacies. Urban forest inequalities and inequities are often attributed to drivers like systemic racism and segregation. However, in recent decades, invasive pests and pathogens have substantially changed urban forests. It is not known how these invasive pests and pathogens act as a driver of urban forest inequalities and inequities. At the western range of Dutch elm disease (Ophiostoma spp.) and emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis), we examined how the loss of localized street tree monocultures of elm (Ulmus spp.) and ash (Fraxinus spp.) will result in changes to distributional justice. We examined street tree count and basal area distributions, applying the Gini Index and spatial autoregression to measure inequality and inequity, respectively, under current conditions and hypothetical pest-induced loss scenarios. Findings reveal that DED-related elm losses could improve distributional equality, likely due to the high density of elm in already greener areas, while EAB-related losses of ash could increase inequalities. Street tree losses to both DED and EAB dampen the magnitude of distributional inequities, but the inequities remain present in areas of high residential instability, economic dependency, and ethno-cultural composition. Our results indicate that pest-induced urban forest losses do not merely reduce canopy cover but may reshape distributional equality and equity in ways that align with socioeconomic disparities. This research highlights the need to incorporate principles of environmental justice in pest management approaches and replanting efforts, particularly prioritizing systemically marginalized communities. These findings underscore the critical role of diversity and strategic planning in urban forest resilience, advocating for practices that mitigate the social and ecological impacts of invasive pests and pathogens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信