Kate Alfeld,Murray L Barclay,Richard McNeill,Chris Frampton,Matt Doogue,Lisa K Stamp
{"title":"痛风的住院治疗:我们仍然失败。","authors":"Kate Alfeld,Murray L Barclay,Richard McNeill,Chris Frampton,Matt Doogue,Lisa K Stamp","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nDespite effective treatment, gout is poorly managed. The aim of this study was to determine rates of serum urate (SU) testing and allopurinol dose adjustment in patients on allopurinol admitted to Christchurch based hospitals.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe hospital electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system was used to identify patients on allopurinol during hospital admissions from March 2016-March 2023. Demographics, SU, renal function and changes to allopurinol therapy were recorded for each admission. Results were stratified by target SU and renal function.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 18,081 admissions taking allopurinol, SU was measured in 2,950 (16.32%). The mean SU was 0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L, with 1,270 (43.05%) above target SU (0.36 mmol/L). Admissions with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 were more likely to have SU above target than CKD1-2 (78.7% vs 21.3% (p<0.001). Of those with SU above target allopurinol was ceased in 148 (11.7%), dose reduced in 44 (3.5%), increased in 92 (7.2%), and unchanged in 986 (77.6%) during the admission. Those above target SU with CKD stage 3-5 were more likely to stop/decrease allopurinol dose compared to those with CKD stage 1-2 (16.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.01).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nMore than 80% of hospital admissions did not have SU measured despite the patient receiving allopurinol. Most admissions, acknowledging limitations, had suboptimal management of the allopurinol dose in the context of their SU. These results reflect a missed opportunity to review and optimise gout management.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient management of gout: we are still failing.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Alfeld,Murray L Barclay,Richard McNeill,Chris Frampton,Matt Doogue,Lisa K Stamp\",\"doi\":\"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nDespite effective treatment, gout is poorly managed. The aim of this study was to determine rates of serum urate (SU) testing and allopurinol dose adjustment in patients on allopurinol admitted to Christchurch based hospitals.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe hospital electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system was used to identify patients on allopurinol during hospital admissions from March 2016-March 2023. Demographics, SU, renal function and changes to allopurinol therapy were recorded for each admission. Results were stratified by target SU and renal function.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 18,081 admissions taking allopurinol, SU was measured in 2,950 (16.32%). The mean SU was 0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L, with 1,270 (43.05%) above target SU (0.36 mmol/L). Admissions with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 were more likely to have SU above target than CKD1-2 (78.7% vs 21.3% (p<0.001). Of those with SU above target allopurinol was ceased in 148 (11.7%), dose reduced in 44 (3.5%), increased in 92 (7.2%), and unchanged in 986 (77.6%) during the admission. Those above target SU with CKD stage 3-5 were more likely to stop/decrease allopurinol dose compared to those with CKD stage 1-2 (16.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.01).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nMore than 80% of hospital admissions did not have SU measured despite the patient receiving allopurinol. Most admissions, acknowledging limitations, had suboptimal management of the allopurinol dose in the context of their SU. These results reflect a missed opportunity to review and optimise gout management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管治疗有效,但痛风的管理不善。本研究的目的是确定在基督城医院接受别嘌呤醇治疗的患者的血清尿酸(SU)检测率和别嘌呤醇剂量调整率。方法采用医院电子处方管理系统(ePA)对2016年3月至2023年3月住院期间使用别嘌呤醇的患者进行鉴定。记录每次入院患者的人口统计学、SU、肾功能和别嘌呤醇治疗的变化。结果按目标SU和肾功能分层。结果18081例服用别嘌呤醇的住院患者中,有2950例(16.32%)检测到SU。平均SU为0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L,高于目标SU (0.36 mmol/L) 1,270(43.05%)。入院的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD) 3-5期患者SU高于目标的可能性高于CKD1-2期患者(78.7% vs 21.3%) (p<0.001)。在SU高于目标的患者中,148人(11.7%)停止使用别嘌呤醇,44人(3.5%)减少剂量,92人(7.2%)增加剂量,986人(77.6%)在入院期间保持不变。高于目标SU的CKD 3-5期患者比CKD 1-2期患者更有可能停止/减少别嘌呤醇剂量(16.4% vs 10.4%;p = 0.01)。结论:超过80%的住院患者尽管接受了别嘌呤醇治疗,但仍未进行SU测量。大多数入院患者承认局限性,在他们的SU背景下,别嘌呤醇剂量管理不理想。这些结果反映了错过了审查和优化痛风管理的机会。
Inpatient management of gout: we are still failing.
OBJECTIVE
Despite effective treatment, gout is poorly managed. The aim of this study was to determine rates of serum urate (SU) testing and allopurinol dose adjustment in patients on allopurinol admitted to Christchurch based hospitals.
METHODS
The hospital electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system was used to identify patients on allopurinol during hospital admissions from March 2016-March 2023. Demographics, SU, renal function and changes to allopurinol therapy were recorded for each admission. Results were stratified by target SU and renal function.
RESULTS
Of 18,081 admissions taking allopurinol, SU was measured in 2,950 (16.32%). The mean SU was 0.37 (SD 0.12) mmol/L, with 1,270 (43.05%) above target SU (0.36 mmol/L). Admissions with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 were more likely to have SU above target than CKD1-2 (78.7% vs 21.3% (p<0.001). Of those with SU above target allopurinol was ceased in 148 (11.7%), dose reduced in 44 (3.5%), increased in 92 (7.2%), and unchanged in 986 (77.6%) during the admission. Those above target SU with CKD stage 3-5 were more likely to stop/decrease allopurinol dose compared to those with CKD stage 1-2 (16.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.01).
CONCLUSION
More than 80% of hospital admissions did not have SU measured despite the patient receiving allopurinol. Most admissions, acknowledging limitations, had suboptimal management of the allopurinol dose in the context of their SU. These results reflect a missed opportunity to review and optimise gout management.