银屑病关节炎患者疾病状态感知与最小疾病活动度(MDA)标准不同组成部分之间的关系

Sarah M Yazji,Philip S Helliwell,Andra Balanescu,Emmanuelle Dernis,Uta Kiltz,Umut Kalyoncu,Ying Ying Leung,Ana-Maria Orbai,Josef S Smolen,Maarten de Wit,Laure Gossec,Laura C Coates
{"title":"银屑病关节炎患者疾病状态感知与最小疾病活动度(MDA)标准不同组成部分之间的关系","authors":"Sarah M Yazji,Philip S Helliwell,Andra Balanescu,Emmanuelle Dernis,Uta Kiltz,Umut Kalyoncu,Ying Ying Leung,Ana-Maria Orbai,Josef S Smolen,Maarten de Wit,Laure Gossec,Laura C Coates","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThe aim of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between the criteria met of the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) score for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and patient-perceived disease status.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe analysed data from the ReFlaP study (NCT03119805), a cross-sectional international study of adult patients with PsA. Patients self-reported if they felt their PsA was in remission (REM), low disease activity (LDA) or neither. The relationship between patient-reported status and MDA domains met was analysed using point biserial correlation, chi-square test (Χ2), odds ratio, and specificity.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n88.4% of study patients who met MDA reported good disease status (REM/LDA). Pain was the most commonly missed domain for these patients. A moderate to strong correlation was found between meeting more MDA domains and patient-reported good status irrespective of domain missed. On individual domain testing, MDA state and patient-reported REM/LDA were significantly associated irrespective of domain missed with the exception of enthesitis. Specificity of the MDA score irrespective of domain missed was above 90%. The odds of MDA patients reporting poor disease status was significant only for when pain < 1 was the unmet domain. This significance was not supported by sensitivity analysis.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis study suggests strong agreement between MDA status and patient-reported good status irrespective of domain missed. Pain < 1 or 2 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale was the hardest domain to meet. The high specificity regardless of the unmet domain suggests patients who feel their disease is active are minimally misclassified by the score.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between patient perception of disease status and different components of the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) criteria in psoriatic arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M Yazji,Philip S Helliwell,Andra Balanescu,Emmanuelle Dernis,Uta Kiltz,Umut Kalyoncu,Ying Ying Leung,Ana-Maria Orbai,Josef S Smolen,Maarten de Wit,Laure Gossec,Laura C Coates\",\"doi\":\"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThe aim of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between the criteria met of the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) score for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and patient-perceived disease status.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe analysed data from the ReFlaP study (NCT03119805), a cross-sectional international study of adult patients with PsA. Patients self-reported if they felt their PsA was in remission (REM), low disease activity (LDA) or neither. The relationship between patient-reported status and MDA domains met was analysed using point biserial correlation, chi-square test (Χ2), odds ratio, and specificity.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\n88.4% of study patients who met MDA reported good disease status (REM/LDA). Pain was the most commonly missed domain for these patients. A moderate to strong correlation was found between meeting more MDA domains and patient-reported good status irrespective of domain missed. On individual domain testing, MDA state and patient-reported REM/LDA were significantly associated irrespective of domain missed with the exception of enthesitis. Specificity of the MDA score irrespective of domain missed was above 90%. The odds of MDA patients reporting poor disease status was significant only for when pain < 1 was the unmet domain. This significance was not supported by sensitivity analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThis study suggests strong agreement between MDA status and patient-reported good status irrespective of domain missed. Pain < 1 or 2 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale was the hardest domain to meet. The high specificity regardless of the unmet domain suggests patients who feel their disease is active are minimally misclassified by the score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本分析的目的是评估银屑病关节炎(PsA)最小疾病活动度(MDA)评分满足标准与患者感知疾病状态之间的关系。方法:我们分析了来自ReFlaP研究(NCT03119805)的数据,这是一项针对成年PsA患者的横断面国际研究。患者自我报告他们是否觉得自己的PsA处于缓解(REM)、低疾病活动性(LDA)或两者都没有。采用点双列相关、卡方检验(Χ2)、优势比和特异性分析患者报告状态与MDA结构域满足的关系。结果88.4%符合MDA的患者报告良好的疾病状态(REM/LDA)。疼痛是这些患者最常遗漏的领域。在满足更多的MDA结构域和患者报告的良好状态之间发现了中等到强的相关性,而不管缺失的结构域。在个体结构域测试中,MDA状态和患者报告的REM/LDA显著相关,而不考虑结构域的缺失。无论是否缺失结构域,MDA评分的特异性均在90%以上。MDA患者报告不良疾病状态的几率仅在疼痛< 1为未满足域时才显著。敏感性分析不支持这种显著性。结论:本研究表明,MDA状态与患者报告的良好状态之间存在很强的一致性,而与缺失的结构域无关。在0-10的数值评定量表中,疼痛< 1或2是最难达到的。无论未满足域如何,高特异性表明,感觉自己的疾病处于活动性的患者被评分错误分类的可能性最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between patient perception of disease status and different components of the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) criteria in psoriatic arthritis.
OBJECTIVE The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between the criteria met of the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) score for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and patient-perceived disease status. METHODS We analysed data from the ReFlaP study (NCT03119805), a cross-sectional international study of adult patients with PsA. Patients self-reported if they felt their PsA was in remission (REM), low disease activity (LDA) or neither. The relationship between patient-reported status and MDA domains met was analysed using point biserial correlation, chi-square test (Χ2), odds ratio, and specificity. RESULTS 88.4% of study patients who met MDA reported good disease status (REM/LDA). Pain was the most commonly missed domain for these patients. A moderate to strong correlation was found between meeting more MDA domains and patient-reported good status irrespective of domain missed. On individual domain testing, MDA state and patient-reported REM/LDA were significantly associated irrespective of domain missed with the exception of enthesitis. Specificity of the MDA score irrespective of domain missed was above 90%. The odds of MDA patients reporting poor disease status was significant only for when pain < 1 was the unmet domain. This significance was not supported by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION This study suggests strong agreement between MDA status and patient-reported good status irrespective of domain missed. Pain < 1 or 2 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale was the hardest domain to meet. The high specificity regardless of the unmet domain suggests patients who feel their disease is active are minimally misclassified by the score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信