利用深度学习模型预测特发性视网膜前膜手术术后视力结果。

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
HSIN-LE LIN , PO-CHEN TSENG , MIN-HUEI HSU , SYU-JYUN PENG
{"title":"利用深度学习模型预测特发性视网膜前膜手术术后视力结果。","authors":"HSIN-LE LIN ,&nbsp;PO-CHEN TSENG ,&nbsp;MIN-HUEI HSU ,&nbsp;SYU-JYUN PENG","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study assessed the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the postoperative outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery based on preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Validation of algorithms to predict the outcomes of ERM surgery based on OCT data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Internal training and validation were performed using 1,392 OCT images from 696 eyes. External testing was performed using 152 OCT images from 76 eyes. This study assessed three deep learning models, including Inception-v3, ResNet-101, and VGG-19. Grad-CAM was employed for hotspot analysis. The dataset was split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subjects presenting an improvement of ≥2 lines on the Snellen chart at 1-year postsurgery were classified as <em>pronounced visual improvement</em>, whereas those presenting an improvement of &lt;2 lines were classified as <em>limited visual improvement</em>. Using an external test dataset, we compared assessments by seven ophthalmologists with the prediction of deep learning model. The main outcome measures were recall, specificity, precision, F1 score, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ResNet-101 achieved the best overall performance, as evidenced by the following metrics: recall (0.90), specificity (0.90), precision (0.91), F1-score (0.90), accuracy (0.90), and AUROC (0.97). In Grad-CAM heatmap analysis, the logic of ResNet-101 closely resembled that of clinical physicians. Overall, the performance of this deep learning model was significantly better than that of general ophthalmologists and non-retina specialists and was slightly superior to that of retina specialists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning based on preoperative OCT images proved highly effective in predicting the outcomes of ERM surgery and elucidating the structural mechanisms underlying the phenomena observed in OCT images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"272 ","pages":"Pages 67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a Deep Learning Model to Predict Postoperative Visual Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery\",\"authors\":\"HSIN-LE LIN ,&nbsp;PO-CHEN TSENG ,&nbsp;MIN-HUEI HSU ,&nbsp;SYU-JYUN PENG\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study assessed the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the postoperative outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery based on preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Validation of algorithms to predict the outcomes of ERM surgery based on OCT data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Internal training and validation were performed using 1,392 OCT images from 696 eyes. External testing was performed using 152 OCT images from 76 eyes. This study assessed three deep learning models, including Inception-v3, ResNet-101, and VGG-19. Grad-CAM was employed for hotspot analysis. The dataset was split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subjects presenting an improvement of ≥2 lines on the Snellen chart at 1-year postsurgery were classified as <em>pronounced visual improvement</em>, whereas those presenting an improvement of &lt;2 lines were classified as <em>limited visual improvement</em>. Using an external test dataset, we compared assessments by seven ophthalmologists with the prediction of deep learning model. The main outcome measures were recall, specificity, precision, F1 score, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ResNet-101 achieved the best overall performance, as evidenced by the following metrics: recall (0.90), specificity (0.90), precision (0.91), F1-score (0.90), accuracy (0.90), and AUROC (0.97). In Grad-CAM heatmap analysis, the logic of ResNet-101 closely resembled that of clinical physicians. Overall, the performance of this deep learning model was significantly better than that of general ophthalmologists and non-retina specialists and was slightly superior to that of retina specialists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning based on preoperative OCT images proved highly effective in predicting the outcomes of ERM surgery and elucidating the structural mechanisms underlying the phenomena observed in OCT images.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"272 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 67-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425000224\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425000224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了基于术前光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像的各种深度学习模型在预测特发性视网膜前膜(ERM)手术预后方面的性能。设计验证基于OCT数据预测ERM手术结果的算法。方法使用696只眼的1392张OCT图像进行内部训练和验证。外部测试使用76只眼睛的152张OCT图像。本研究评估了三种深度学习模型,包括Inception-v3、ResNet-101和VGG-19。采用Grad-CAM进行热点分析。数据集被分成训练集(80%)和验证集(20%)。术后1年Snellen图上改善≥2条线的受试者被归类为明显的视力改善,而改善<2条线的受试者被归类为视力改善有限。使用外部测试数据集,我们将7位眼科医生的评估与深度学习模型的预测进行了比较。主要结局指标为召回率、特异性、精密度、F1评分、准确度和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。结果resnet -101在召回率(0.90)、特异性(0.90)、精密度(0.91)、f1评分(0.90)、准确度(0.90)和AUROC(0.97)方面取得了最佳的综合性能。在Grad-CAM热图分析中,ResNet-101的逻辑与临床医生的逻辑非常相似。总体而言,该深度学习模型的性能明显优于普通眼科医生和非视网膜专家,略优于视网膜专家。结论基于术前OCT图像的深度学习在预测ERM手术结果和阐明OCT图像现象背后的结构机制方面是非常有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a Deep Learning Model to Predict Postoperative Visual Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery

Purpose

This study assessed the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the postoperative outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery based on preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

Design

Validation of algorithms to predict the outcomes of ERM surgery based on OCT data.

Methods

Internal training and validation were performed using 1,392 OCT images from 696 eyes. External testing was performed using 152 OCT images from 76 eyes. This study assessed three deep learning models, including Inception-v3, ResNet-101, and VGG-19. Grad-CAM was employed for hotspot analysis. The dataset was split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subjects presenting an improvement of ≥2 lines on the Snellen chart at 1-year postsurgery were classified as pronounced visual improvement, whereas those presenting an improvement of <2 lines were classified as limited visual improvement. Using an external test dataset, we compared assessments by seven ophthalmologists with the prediction of deep learning model. The main outcome measures were recall, specificity, precision, F1 score, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results

ResNet-101 achieved the best overall performance, as evidenced by the following metrics: recall (0.90), specificity (0.90), precision (0.91), F1-score (0.90), accuracy (0.90), and AUROC (0.97). In Grad-CAM heatmap analysis, the logic of ResNet-101 closely resembled that of clinical physicians. Overall, the performance of this deep learning model was significantly better than that of general ophthalmologists and non-retina specialists and was slightly superior to that of retina specialists.

Conclusions

Deep learning based on preoperative OCT images proved highly effective in predicting the outcomes of ERM surgery and elucidating the structural mechanisms underlying the phenomena observed in OCT images.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信