{"title":"利用深度学习模型预测特发性视网膜前膜手术术后视力结果。","authors":"HSIN-LE LIN , PO-CHEN TSENG , MIN-HUEI HSU , SYU-JYUN PENG","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study assessed the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the postoperative outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery based on preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Validation of algorithms to predict the outcomes of ERM surgery based on OCT data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Internal training and validation were performed using 1,392 OCT images from 696 eyes. External testing was performed using 152 OCT images from 76 eyes. This study assessed three deep learning models, including Inception-v3, ResNet-101, and VGG-19. Grad-CAM was employed for hotspot analysis. The dataset was split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subjects presenting an improvement of ≥2 lines on the Snellen chart at 1-year postsurgery were classified as <em>pronounced visual improvement</em>, whereas those presenting an improvement of <2 lines were classified as <em>limited visual improvement</em>. Using an external test dataset, we compared assessments by seven ophthalmologists with the prediction of deep learning model. The main outcome measures were recall, specificity, precision, F1 score, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ResNet-101 achieved the best overall performance, as evidenced by the following metrics: recall (0.90), specificity (0.90), precision (0.91), F1-score (0.90), accuracy (0.90), and AUROC (0.97). In Grad-CAM heatmap analysis, the logic of ResNet-101 closely resembled that of clinical physicians. Overall, the performance of this deep learning model was significantly better than that of general ophthalmologists and non-retina specialists and was slightly superior to that of retina specialists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning based on preoperative OCT images proved highly effective in predicting the outcomes of ERM surgery and elucidating the structural mechanisms underlying the phenomena observed in OCT images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"272 ","pages":"Pages 67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a Deep Learning Model to Predict Postoperative Visual Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery\",\"authors\":\"HSIN-LE LIN , PO-CHEN TSENG , MIN-HUEI HSU , SYU-JYUN PENG\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study assessed the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the postoperative outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery based on preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Validation of algorithms to predict the outcomes of ERM surgery based on OCT data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Internal training and validation were performed using 1,392 OCT images from 696 eyes. External testing was performed using 152 OCT images from 76 eyes. This study assessed three deep learning models, including Inception-v3, ResNet-101, and VGG-19. Grad-CAM was employed for hotspot analysis. The dataset was split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subjects presenting an improvement of ≥2 lines on the Snellen chart at 1-year postsurgery were classified as <em>pronounced visual improvement</em>, whereas those presenting an improvement of <2 lines were classified as <em>limited visual improvement</em>. Using an external test dataset, we compared assessments by seven ophthalmologists with the prediction of deep learning model. The main outcome measures were recall, specificity, precision, F1 score, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ResNet-101 achieved the best overall performance, as evidenced by the following metrics: recall (0.90), specificity (0.90), precision (0.91), F1-score (0.90), accuracy (0.90), and AUROC (0.97). In Grad-CAM heatmap analysis, the logic of ResNet-101 closely resembled that of clinical physicians. Overall, the performance of this deep learning model was significantly better than that of general ophthalmologists and non-retina specialists and was slightly superior to that of retina specialists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Deep learning based on preoperative OCT images proved highly effective in predicting the outcomes of ERM surgery and elucidating the structural mechanisms underlying the phenomena observed in OCT images.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"272 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 67-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425000224\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425000224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using a Deep Learning Model to Predict Postoperative Visual Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery
Purpose
This study assessed the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the postoperative outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery based on preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.
Design
Validation of algorithms to predict the outcomes of ERM surgery based on OCT data.
Methods
Internal training and validation were performed using 1,392 OCT images from 696 eyes. External testing was performed using 152 OCT images from 76 eyes. This study assessed three deep learning models, including Inception-v3, ResNet-101, and VGG-19. Grad-CAM was employed for hotspot analysis. The dataset was split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subjects presenting an improvement of ≥2 lines on the Snellen chart at 1-year postsurgery were classified as pronounced visual improvement, whereas those presenting an improvement of <2 lines were classified as limited visual improvement. Using an external test dataset, we compared assessments by seven ophthalmologists with the prediction of deep learning model. The main outcome measures were recall, specificity, precision, F1 score, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results
ResNet-101 achieved the best overall performance, as evidenced by the following metrics: recall (0.90), specificity (0.90), precision (0.91), F1-score (0.90), accuracy (0.90), and AUROC (0.97). In Grad-CAM heatmap analysis, the logic of ResNet-101 closely resembled that of clinical physicians. Overall, the performance of this deep learning model was significantly better than that of general ophthalmologists and non-retina specialists and was slightly superior to that of retina specialists.
Conclusions
Deep learning based on preoperative OCT images proved highly effective in predicting the outcomes of ERM surgery and elucidating the structural mechanisms underlying the phenomena observed in OCT images.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.