{"title":"携带不同分子状态和表型的WNT10A突变患者的牙种植康复:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jiaqi Dou, Qinggang Dai, Xinbo Yu, Yining He, Yuwei Dai, Feng Wang, Yiqun Wu","doi":"10.1111/clr.14402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives<jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations are associated with tooth agenesis. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients carrying <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations with different molecular statuses and phenotypes over a long‐term follow‐up period.Materials and MethodsPatients with tooth agenesis were screened by whole‐exome sequencing (WES) from January 2010 to September 2023. Carriers of pathogenic <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations who underwent subsequent dental implant therapy were evaluated.ResultsWES identified 66 patients with tooth agenesis carrying <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations. Of these, 27 patients (11 males/16 females; mean age 19.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. Homozygotes had significantly more missing teeth (24.4 ± 3.8) than heterozygotes (10.9 ± 5.1, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.0001) and compound heterozygotes (13.8 ± 3.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001). A total of 160 conventional implants were placed. Seven implants were lost in four patients before final prosthesis placement, resulting in overall failure rates of 14.8% at the subject level and 4.4% at the implant level. The 5‐year cumulative survival rate (range: 0.23–12.74 years) was 85.2% and 95.6% at the subject and implant levels, respectively. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 0.80 mm (95% CI: 0.59–1.02). Subgroup analysis revealed higher MBL in homozygotes (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), sites requiring extensive bone augmentation (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.016), anterior regions (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.031), and full‐arch bridge cases (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction and OHIP‐C49 scores were favorable.ConclusionsImplant rehabilitation is predictable for patients with <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations. However, increased MBL observed in homozygotes with severe tooth agenesis and in cases requiring extensive alveolar bone augmentation highlights the importance of genetic diagnosis prior to implant therapy in patients with severe tooth agenesis.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental Implant Rehabilitation in Patients Carrying WNT10A Mutations With Different Molecular Statuses and Phenotypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Dou, Qinggang Dai, Xinbo Yu, Yining He, Yuwei Dai, Feng Wang, Yiqun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives<jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations are associated with tooth agenesis. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients carrying <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations with different molecular statuses and phenotypes over a long‐term follow‐up period.Materials and MethodsPatients with tooth agenesis were screened by whole‐exome sequencing (WES) from January 2010 to September 2023. Carriers of pathogenic <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations who underwent subsequent dental implant therapy were evaluated.ResultsWES identified 66 patients with tooth agenesis carrying <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations. Of these, 27 patients (11 males/16 females; mean age 19.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. Homozygotes had significantly more missing teeth (24.4 ± 3.8) than heterozygotes (10.9 ± 5.1, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.0001) and compound heterozygotes (13.8 ± 3.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001). A total of 160 conventional implants were placed. Seven implants were lost in four patients before final prosthesis placement, resulting in overall failure rates of 14.8% at the subject level and 4.4% at the implant level. The 5‐year cumulative survival rate (range: 0.23–12.74 years) was 85.2% and 95.6% at the subject and implant levels, respectively. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 0.80 mm (95% CI: 0.59–1.02). Subgroup analysis revealed higher MBL in homozygotes (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), sites requiring extensive bone augmentation (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.016), anterior regions (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.031), and full‐arch bridge cases (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction and OHIP‐C49 scores were favorable.ConclusionsImplant rehabilitation is predictable for patients with <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations. However, increased MBL observed in homozygotes with severe tooth agenesis and in cases requiring extensive alveolar bone augmentation highlights the importance of genetic diagnosis prior to implant therapy in patients with severe tooth agenesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14402\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dental Implant Rehabilitation in Patients Carrying WNT10A Mutations With Different Molecular Statuses and Phenotypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study
ObjectivesWNT10A mutations are associated with tooth agenesis. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients carrying WNT10A mutations with different molecular statuses and phenotypes over a long‐term follow‐up period.Materials and MethodsPatients with tooth agenesis were screened by whole‐exome sequencing (WES) from January 2010 to September 2023. Carriers of pathogenic WNT10A mutations who underwent subsequent dental implant therapy were evaluated.ResultsWES identified 66 patients with tooth agenesis carrying WNT10A mutations. Of these, 27 patients (11 males/16 females; mean age 19.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. Homozygotes had significantly more missing teeth (24.4 ± 3.8) than heterozygotes (10.9 ± 5.1, p < 0.0001) and compound heterozygotes (13.8 ± 3.5, p = 0.001). A total of 160 conventional implants were placed. Seven implants were lost in four patients before final prosthesis placement, resulting in overall failure rates of 14.8% at the subject level and 4.4% at the implant level. The 5‐year cumulative survival rate (range: 0.23–12.74 years) was 85.2% and 95.6% at the subject and implant levels, respectively. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 0.80 mm (95% CI: 0.59–1.02). Subgroup analysis revealed higher MBL in homozygotes (p = 0.002), sites requiring extensive bone augmentation (p = 0.016), anterior regions (p = 0.031), and full‐arch bridge cases (p < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction and OHIP‐C49 scores were favorable.ConclusionsImplant rehabilitation is predictable for patients with WNT10A mutations. However, increased MBL observed in homozygotes with severe tooth agenesis and in cases requiring extensive alveolar bone augmentation highlights the importance of genetic diagnosis prior to implant therapy in patients with severe tooth agenesis.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.