中国多主体漂绿治理分析:一个随机进化博弈视角

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Weihua Qu , Haojie Wu , Guohua Qu , Jie Yin , Jianhua Cao
{"title":"中国多主体漂绿治理分析:一个随机进化博弈视角","authors":"Weihua Qu ,&nbsp;Haojie Wu ,&nbsp;Guohua Qu ,&nbsp;Jie Yin ,&nbsp;Jianhua Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The greenwashing behaviors (GWBs) in contemporary enterprises exhibit characteristics of widespread prevalence, low concentration, and skilled concealment, rendering traditional governance models gradually ineffective. This challenge is compounded when local governments, driven by economic pressures or political considerations, choose to ignore GWBs during the territorial supervision process. Accordingly, this study constructs a tripartite game model—considering both scenarios with and without central government regulation—based on the strategic interactions between local governments, enterprises, and the public. Findings indicate: (1) Public participation in supervision (PPS) is crucial for curbing GWBs, as high PPS levels can unravel collusion between local governments and enterprises; (2) Higher environmental political incentives tend to reduce local government supervision of GWBs; (3) The central government's adoption of an innovative punishment-reward mechanism combining static and dynamic elements, can help maintain the governance system in an ideally stable state; (4) The robustness of effective GWBs governance endures amid stochastic perturbations when establishing a rational multi-agent cooperative regulatory framework, with enterprises' strategic choices being less affected by such random disturbances. Our model, by incorporating real-world scenarios of public exposure to corporate GWBs, better adapts to the regulatory dilemma. It provides a low-cost and feasible solution to address greenwashing issues in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"492 ","pages":"Article 144729"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of multi-agent greenwashing governance in China: A stochastic evolutionary game perspective\",\"authors\":\"Weihua Qu ,&nbsp;Haojie Wu ,&nbsp;Guohua Qu ,&nbsp;Jie Yin ,&nbsp;Jianhua Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The greenwashing behaviors (GWBs) in contemporary enterprises exhibit characteristics of widespread prevalence, low concentration, and skilled concealment, rendering traditional governance models gradually ineffective. This challenge is compounded when local governments, driven by economic pressures or political considerations, choose to ignore GWBs during the territorial supervision process. Accordingly, this study constructs a tripartite game model—considering both scenarios with and without central government regulation—based on the strategic interactions between local governments, enterprises, and the public. Findings indicate: (1) Public participation in supervision (PPS) is crucial for curbing GWBs, as high PPS levels can unravel collusion between local governments and enterprises; (2) Higher environmental political incentives tend to reduce local government supervision of GWBs; (3) The central government's adoption of an innovative punishment-reward mechanism combining static and dynamic elements, can help maintain the governance system in an ideally stable state; (4) The robustness of effective GWBs governance endures amid stochastic perturbations when establishing a rational multi-agent cooperative regulatory framework, with enterprises' strategic choices being less affected by such random disturbances. Our model, by incorporating real-world scenarios of public exposure to corporate GWBs, better adapts to the regulatory dilemma. It provides a low-cost and feasible solution to address greenwashing issues in China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"492 \",\"pages\":\"Article 144729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625000794\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625000794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代企业的洗绿行为呈现出普遍存在、集中度低、隐蔽性强的特点,使得传统的治理模式逐渐失效。当地方政府在经济压力或政治考虑的驱使下,在领土监管过程中选择忽视gwb时,这一挑战变得更加复杂。因此,本研究基于地方政府、企业和公众之间的战略互动,构建了一个考虑中央政府监管和没有中央政府监管两种情况的三方博弈模型。研究结果表明:(1)公众监督参与对治理gwb至关重要,公众监督参与水平高可以揭示地方政府与企业之间的勾结;(2)较高的环境政治激励倾向于降低地方政府对gwb的监管;(3)中央政府采用创新的奖惩机制,将静态因素与动态因素相结合,有助于保持治理体系处于理想的稳定状态;(4)在建立合理的多主体合作监管框架时,有效的gwb治理在随机扰动下仍然具有鲁棒性,企业的战略选择受随机扰动的影响较小。我们的模型通过纳入公众对企业gwb敞口的真实场景,更好地适应了监管困境。它为解决中国的“漂绿”问题提供了一种低成本、可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of multi-agent greenwashing governance in China: A stochastic evolutionary game perspective
The greenwashing behaviors (GWBs) in contemporary enterprises exhibit characteristics of widespread prevalence, low concentration, and skilled concealment, rendering traditional governance models gradually ineffective. This challenge is compounded when local governments, driven by economic pressures or political considerations, choose to ignore GWBs during the territorial supervision process. Accordingly, this study constructs a tripartite game model—considering both scenarios with and without central government regulation—based on the strategic interactions between local governments, enterprises, and the public. Findings indicate: (1) Public participation in supervision (PPS) is crucial for curbing GWBs, as high PPS levels can unravel collusion between local governments and enterprises; (2) Higher environmental political incentives tend to reduce local government supervision of GWBs; (3) The central government's adoption of an innovative punishment-reward mechanism combining static and dynamic elements, can help maintain the governance system in an ideally stable state; (4) The robustness of effective GWBs governance endures amid stochastic perturbations when establishing a rational multi-agent cooperative regulatory framework, with enterprises' strategic choices being less affected by such random disturbances. Our model, by incorporating real-world scenarios of public exposure to corporate GWBs, better adapts to the regulatory dilemma. It provides a low-cost and feasible solution to address greenwashing issues in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信