2022年2月3日至4日的星链风暴期间和前后的热层都很难预测

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. O. Reznychenko, D. V. Kotov, P. G. Richards, O. V. Bogomaz, A. I. Reznychenko, L. P. Goncharenko, T. G. Zhivolup, I. F. Domnin
{"title":"2022年2月3日至4日的星链风暴期间和前后的热层都很难预测","authors":"M. O. Reznychenko,&nbsp;D. V. Kotov,&nbsp;P. G. Richards,&nbsp;O. V. Bogomaz,&nbsp;A. I. Reznychenko,&nbsp;L. P. Goncharenko,&nbsp;T. G. Zhivolup,&nbsp;I. F. Domnin","doi":"10.1029/2024GL112620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Observation-based simulations of the ionosphere were performed with the NRLMSISE-00 model for six locations around the globe during 1–9 February 2022, which includes the so-called Starlink Storm. Unlike other studies, we focused on the magnetically quiet days around the storm. Unexpectedly, the observed values of the F2-layer peak density were ∼50% larger than the simulated values. We show that this implies that the daytime O density in the thermosphere was systematically ∼30% larger than the NRLMSISE-00 predicts. Further investigation shows that this discrepancy is not an exclusive feature of the period around the Starlink Storm and a similar problem happens for some periods for different years. It is unclear if the reason is an actual increase of the O density or its underestimation by the model. Resolving this problem is critical for providing accurate predictions of the atmosphere to avoid the degradation of normal operation or even loss of space assets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL112620","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Thermosphere Was Poorly Predictable Not Only During but Also Before and After the Starlink Storm on 3–4 February 2022\",\"authors\":\"M. O. Reznychenko,&nbsp;D. V. Kotov,&nbsp;P. G. Richards,&nbsp;O. V. Bogomaz,&nbsp;A. I. Reznychenko,&nbsp;L. P. Goncharenko,&nbsp;T. G. Zhivolup,&nbsp;I. F. Domnin\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GL112620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Observation-based simulations of the ionosphere were performed with the NRLMSISE-00 model for six locations around the globe during 1–9 February 2022, which includes the so-called Starlink Storm. Unlike other studies, we focused on the magnetically quiet days around the storm. Unexpectedly, the observed values of the F2-layer peak density were ∼50% larger than the simulated values. We show that this implies that the daytime O density in the thermosphere was systematically ∼30% larger than the NRLMSISE-00 predicts. Further investigation shows that this discrepancy is not an exclusive feature of the period around the Starlink Storm and a similar problem happens for some periods for different years. It is unclear if the reason is an actual increase of the O density or its underestimation by the model. Resolving this problem is critical for providing accurate predictions of the atmosphere to avoid the degradation of normal operation or even loss of space assets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL112620\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL112620\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL112620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2022年2月1日至9日期间,使用NRLMSISE-00模型对全球六个地点的电离层进行了基于观测的模拟,其中包括所谓的星链风暴。与其他研究不同的是,我们关注的是风暴周围磁场平静的日子。出乎意料的是,f2层峰值密度的观测值比模拟值大50%。我们表明,这意味着白天热层中的O密度比NRLMSISE-00预测的要大30%。进一步的调查表明,这种差异并不是星链风暴周围时期的独有特征,在不同年份的某些时期也会发生类似的问题。目前尚不清楚其原因是O密度的实际增加还是模型对其的低估。解决这一问题对于提供准确的大气预测以避免正常运行的退化甚至空间资产的损失至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Thermosphere Was Poorly Predictable Not Only During but Also Before and After the Starlink Storm on 3–4 February 2022

The Thermosphere Was Poorly Predictable Not Only During but Also Before and After the Starlink Storm on 3–4 February 2022

Observation-based simulations of the ionosphere were performed with the NRLMSISE-00 model for six locations around the globe during 1–9 February 2022, which includes the so-called Starlink Storm. Unlike other studies, we focused on the magnetically quiet days around the storm. Unexpectedly, the observed values of the F2-layer peak density were ∼50% larger than the simulated values. We show that this implies that the daytime O density in the thermosphere was systematically ∼30% larger than the NRLMSISE-00 predicts. Further investigation shows that this discrepancy is not an exclusive feature of the period around the Starlink Storm and a similar problem happens for some periods for different years. It is unclear if the reason is an actual increase of the O density or its underestimation by the model. Resolving this problem is critical for providing accurate predictions of the atmosphere to avoid the degradation of normal operation or even loss of space assets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Research Letters
Geophysical Research Letters 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
1588
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信