Jake Immonen, David Weingaertner, Jittisa Ketkaew, Ravi Prasher, Kody M. Powell
{"title":"工业脱碳用电解氢绿钢装置工艺强化与比较","authors":"Jake Immonen, David Weingaertner, Jittisa Ketkaew, Ravi Prasher, Kody M. Powell","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing interest to produce steel by using a direct reduced iron shaft furnace that reduces iron ore using electrolytic produced hydrogen, followed by an electric arc furnace. This method, called the H<sub>2</sub>-DRI-EAF steel production pathway is currently being implemented at full-scale with several different designs available and can help play a major role in industrial decarbonization. In this work, three main designs are investigated: the SOE-R Design – a novel design that utilizes solid oxide electrolyzers (SOEs) and recycles steam to keep process temperatures high, the SOE-NR Design – a design that utilizes SOEs without recycling steam, and the PEM/AEL Design – a design that uses proton exchange membrane (PEM) or alkaline liquid electrolysis (AEL) electrolyzers. Also investigated is the use of electric arc furnace off-gases to be combusted to supply process heat prior to the direct reduction iron shaft furnace which is compared through the base (B) and off-gas utilization (OGU) sub-designs. Results show that the SOE-R-B Design can produce steel using 3.56 MWh/tonnes liquid steel, representing a 26.9% and 16.6% reduction of energy compared to the PEM/AEL-B Design and SOE-NR-B Design, respectively. Additionally, the SOE-R-B Design produces 1.20 tonnes CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonnes liquid steel using E.U. grid electricity, which is lower than current conventional steel pathways. If low carbon grid electricity is used, the SOE-R-OGU Design can produce steel emitting 0.48 tonnes CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonnes liquid steel. 83% or more of water can be reduced in the SOE-R Design compared to the SOE-NR and PEM/AEL Designs due to not using any water for cooling to condense steam. Lastly, 23.8% – 42.1% of the natural gas used for process heating in a process heating combustion furnace can be reduced when electric arc furnace off-gas is utilized. Overall, a detailed energy, carbon emissions, and water use comparison of three realistic, full-scale electrolytic hydrogen steel plants is presented.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Intensification and Comparison of Electrolytic Hydrogen Green Steel Plants for Industrial Decarbonization\",\"authors\":\"Jake Immonen, David Weingaertner, Jittisa Ketkaew, Ravi Prasher, Kody M. Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a growing interest to produce steel by using a direct reduced iron shaft furnace that reduces iron ore using electrolytic produced hydrogen, followed by an electric arc furnace. This method, called the H<sub>2</sub>-DRI-EAF steel production pathway is currently being implemented at full-scale with several different designs available and can help play a major role in industrial decarbonization. In this work, three main designs are investigated: the SOE-R Design – a novel design that utilizes solid oxide electrolyzers (SOEs) and recycles steam to keep process temperatures high, the SOE-NR Design – a design that utilizes SOEs without recycling steam, and the PEM/AEL Design – a design that uses proton exchange membrane (PEM) or alkaline liquid electrolysis (AEL) electrolyzers. Also investigated is the use of electric arc furnace off-gases to be combusted to supply process heat prior to the direct reduction iron shaft furnace which is compared through the base (B) and off-gas utilization (OGU) sub-designs. Results show that the SOE-R-B Design can produce steel using 3.56 MWh/tonnes liquid steel, representing a 26.9% and 16.6% reduction of energy compared to the PEM/AEL-B Design and SOE-NR-B Design, respectively. Additionally, the SOE-R-B Design produces 1.20 tonnes CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonnes liquid steel using E.U. grid electricity, which is lower than current conventional steel pathways. If low carbon grid electricity is used, the SOE-R-OGU Design can produce steel emitting 0.48 tonnes CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonnes liquid steel. 83% or more of water can be reduced in the SOE-R Design compared to the SOE-NR and PEM/AEL Designs due to not using any water for cooling to condense steam. Lastly, 23.8% – 42.1% of the natural gas used for process heating in a process heating combustion furnace can be reduced when electric arc furnace off-gas is utilized. Overall, a detailed energy, carbon emissions, and water use comparison of three realistic, full-scale electrolytic hydrogen steel plants is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144812\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144812","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Process Intensification and Comparison of Electrolytic Hydrogen Green Steel Plants for Industrial Decarbonization
There is a growing interest to produce steel by using a direct reduced iron shaft furnace that reduces iron ore using electrolytic produced hydrogen, followed by an electric arc furnace. This method, called the H2-DRI-EAF steel production pathway is currently being implemented at full-scale with several different designs available and can help play a major role in industrial decarbonization. In this work, three main designs are investigated: the SOE-R Design – a novel design that utilizes solid oxide electrolyzers (SOEs) and recycles steam to keep process temperatures high, the SOE-NR Design – a design that utilizes SOEs without recycling steam, and the PEM/AEL Design – a design that uses proton exchange membrane (PEM) or alkaline liquid electrolysis (AEL) electrolyzers. Also investigated is the use of electric arc furnace off-gases to be combusted to supply process heat prior to the direct reduction iron shaft furnace which is compared through the base (B) and off-gas utilization (OGU) sub-designs. Results show that the SOE-R-B Design can produce steel using 3.56 MWh/tonnes liquid steel, representing a 26.9% and 16.6% reduction of energy compared to the PEM/AEL-B Design and SOE-NR-B Design, respectively. Additionally, the SOE-R-B Design produces 1.20 tonnes CO2e/tonnes liquid steel using E.U. grid electricity, which is lower than current conventional steel pathways. If low carbon grid electricity is used, the SOE-R-OGU Design can produce steel emitting 0.48 tonnes CO2e/tonnes liquid steel. 83% or more of water can be reduced in the SOE-R Design compared to the SOE-NR and PEM/AEL Designs due to not using any water for cooling to condense steam. Lastly, 23.8% – 42.1% of the natural gas used for process heating in a process heating combustion furnace can be reduced when electric arc furnace off-gas is utilized. Overall, a detailed energy, carbon emissions, and water use comparison of three realistic, full-scale electrolytic hydrogen steel plants is presented.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.