可解释的机器学习与氨基酸PET成像的临床影响:在侵袭性胶质瘤诊断中的应用

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shamimeh Ahrari, Timothée Zaragori, Adeline Zinsz, Gabriela Hossu, Julien Oster, Bastien Allard, Laure Al Mansour, Darejan Bessac, Sami Boumedine, Caroline Bund, Nicolas De Leiris, Anthime Flaus, Eric Guedj, Aurélie Kas, Nathalie Keromnes, Kevin Kiraz, Fiene Marie Kuijper, Valentine Maitre, Solène Querellou, Guilhem Stien, Olivier Humbert, Laetitia Imbert, Antoine Verger
{"title":"可解释的机器学习与氨基酸PET成像的临床影响:在侵袭性胶质瘤诊断中的应用","authors":"Shamimeh Ahrari, Timothée Zaragori, Adeline Zinsz, Gabriela Hossu, Julien Oster, Bastien Allard, Laure Al Mansour, Darejan Bessac, Sami Boumedine, Caroline Bund, Nicolas De Leiris, Anthime Flaus, Eric Guedj, Aurélie Kas, Nathalie Keromnes, Kevin Kiraz, Fiene Marie Kuijper, Valentine Maitre, Solène Querellou, Guilhem Stien, Olivier Humbert, Laetitia Imbert, Antoine Verger","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-07053-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models of amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) images have shown efficiency in glioma prediction tasks. However, their clinical impact on physician interpretation remains limited. This study investigated whether an explainable radiomics model modifies nuclear physicians’ assessment of glioma aggressiveness at diagnosis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients underwent dynamic 6-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-L-DOPA PET acquisition. With a 75%/25% split for training (<i>n</i> = 63) and test sets (<i>n</i> = 22), an ensemble ML model was trained using radiomics features extracted from static/dynamic parametric PET images to classify lesion aggressiveness. Three explainable ML methods—Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Anchor, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)—generated patient-specific explanations. Eighteen physicians from eight institutions evaluated the test samples. During the first phase, physicians analyzed the 22 cases exclusively through magnetic resonance and static/dynamic PET images, acquired within a maximum interval of 30 days. In the second phase, the same physicians reevaluated the same cases (<i>n</i> = 22), using all available data, including the radiomics model predictions and explanations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Eighty-five patients (54[39–62] years old, 41 women) were selected. In the second phase, physicians demonstrated a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy compared to the first phase (0.775 [0.750–0.802] vs. 0.717 [0.694–0.737], <i>p</i> = 0.007). The explainable radiomics model augmented physician agreement, with a 22.72% increase in Fleiss’s kappa, and significantly enhanced physician confidence (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Among all physicians, Anchor and SHAP showed efficacy in 75% and 72% of cases, respectively, outperforming LIME (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our results highlight the potential of an explainable radiomics model using amino acid PET scans as a diagnostic support to assist physicians in identifying glioma aggressiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of an explainable machine learning with amino acid PET imaging: application to the diagnosis of aggressive glioma\",\"authors\":\"Shamimeh Ahrari, Timothée Zaragori, Adeline Zinsz, Gabriela Hossu, Julien Oster, Bastien Allard, Laure Al Mansour, Darejan Bessac, Sami Boumedine, Caroline Bund, Nicolas De Leiris, Anthime Flaus, Eric Guedj, Aurélie Kas, Nathalie Keromnes, Kevin Kiraz, Fiene Marie Kuijper, Valentine Maitre, Solène Querellou, Guilhem Stien, Olivier Humbert, Laetitia Imbert, Antoine Verger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-024-07053-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models of amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) images have shown efficiency in glioma prediction tasks. However, their clinical impact on physician interpretation remains limited. This study investigated whether an explainable radiomics model modifies nuclear physicians’ assessment of glioma aggressiveness at diagnosis.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Patients underwent dynamic 6-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-L-DOPA PET acquisition. With a 75%/25% split for training (<i>n</i> = 63) and test sets (<i>n</i> = 22), an ensemble ML model was trained using radiomics features extracted from static/dynamic parametric PET images to classify lesion aggressiveness. Three explainable ML methods—Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Anchor, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)—generated patient-specific explanations. Eighteen physicians from eight institutions evaluated the test samples. During the first phase, physicians analyzed the 22 cases exclusively through magnetic resonance and static/dynamic PET images, acquired within a maximum interval of 30 days. In the second phase, the same physicians reevaluated the same cases (<i>n</i> = 22), using all available data, including the radiomics model predictions and explanations.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Eighty-five patients (54[39–62] years old, 41 women) were selected. In the second phase, physicians demonstrated a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy compared to the first phase (0.775 [0.750–0.802] vs. 0.717 [0.694–0.737], <i>p</i> = 0.007). The explainable radiomics model augmented physician agreement, with a 22.72% increase in Fleiss’s kappa, and significantly enhanced physician confidence (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Among all physicians, Anchor and SHAP showed efficacy in 75% and 72% of cases, respectively, outperforming LIME (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our results highlight the potential of an explainable radiomics model using amino acid PET scans as a diagnostic support to assist physicians in identifying glioma aggressiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-07053-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-07053-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于放射组学的氨基酸正电子发射断层扫描(PET)图像的机器学习(ML)模型在胶质瘤预测任务中显示出效率。然而,它们对医生解释的临床影响仍然有限。这项研究调查了一个可解释的放射组学模型是否改变了核医生在诊断时对胶质瘤侵袭性的评估。方法对患者进行动态6-[18F]氟-左旋多巴PET采集。训练集(n = 63)和测试集(n = 22)的分割率为75%/25%,使用从静态/动态参数PET图像中提取的放射组学特征训练集成ML模型,对病变侵袭性进行分类。三种可解释的ML方法——局部可解释模型不可知论解释(LIME)、锚点解释(Anchor)和SHapley加性解释(SHAP)——生成针对患者的解释。来自8个机构的18名医生对测试样本进行了评估。在第一阶段,医生通过磁共振和静态/动态PET图像分析了22例病例,这些图像在30天内获得。在第二阶段,相同的医生重新评估相同的病例(n = 22),使用所有可用的数据,包括放射组学模型的预测和解释。结果入选患者85例,年龄54[39-62],女性41例。在第二阶段,与第一阶段相比,医生表现出诊断准确性的显著提高(0.775[0.750-0.802]对0.717 [0.694-0.737],p = 0.007)。可解释的放射组学模型增强了医生的一致性,Fleiss kappa增加了22.72%,并显著增强了医生的信心(p < 0.001)。在所有医生中,Anchor和SHAP分别在75%和72%的病例中显示疗效,优于LIME (p≤0.001)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了一种可解释的放射组学模型的潜力,该模型使用氨基酸PET扫描作为诊断支持,帮助医生识别胶质瘤的侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical impact of an explainable machine learning with amino acid PET imaging: application to the diagnosis of aggressive glioma

Purpose

Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models of amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) images have shown efficiency in glioma prediction tasks. However, their clinical impact on physician interpretation remains limited. This study investigated whether an explainable radiomics model modifies nuclear physicians’ assessment of glioma aggressiveness at diagnosis.

Methods

Patients underwent dynamic 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA PET acquisition. With a 75%/25% split for training (n = 63) and test sets (n = 22), an ensemble ML model was trained using radiomics features extracted from static/dynamic parametric PET images to classify lesion aggressiveness. Three explainable ML methods—Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Anchor, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)—generated patient-specific explanations. Eighteen physicians from eight institutions evaluated the test samples. During the first phase, physicians analyzed the 22 cases exclusively through magnetic resonance and static/dynamic PET images, acquired within a maximum interval of 30 days. In the second phase, the same physicians reevaluated the same cases (n = 22), using all available data, including the radiomics model predictions and explanations.

Results

Eighty-five patients (54[39–62] years old, 41 women) were selected. In the second phase, physicians demonstrated a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy compared to the first phase (0.775 [0.750–0.802] vs. 0.717 [0.694–0.737], p = 0.007). The explainable radiomics model augmented physician agreement, with a 22.72% increase in Fleiss’s kappa, and significantly enhanced physician confidence (p < 0.001). Among all physicians, Anchor and SHAP showed efficacy in 75% and 72% of cases, respectively, outperforming LIME (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results highlight the potential of an explainable radiomics model using amino acid PET scans as a diagnostic support to assist physicians in identifying glioma aggressiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信