不能以激进主义的名义为犯罪行为开脱

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r88

Hud Shaker

{"title":"不能以激进主义的名义为犯罪行为开脱","authors":"Hud Shaker","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wilkinson and colleagues1 and Simpson2 argue that the General Medical Council should overlook criminal behaviour when it aligns with their personal beliefs. Wilkinson and colleagues question the fairness of suspending a doctor involved in unlawful protests, while Simpson advocates sabotaging infrastructure. Both letters downplay the importance of professional accountability and public trust, …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminal behaviour cannot be excused in the name of activism\",\"authors\":\"Hud Shaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj.r88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wilkinson and colleagues1 and Simpson2 argue that the General Medical Council should overlook criminal behaviour when it aligns with their personal beliefs. Wilkinson and colleagues question the fairness of suspending a doctor involved in unlawful protests, while Simpson advocates sabotaging infrastructure. Both letters downplay the importance of professional accountability and public trust, …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

威尔金森及其同事和辛普森认为，当犯罪行为符合他们的个人信仰时，总医学委员会应该忽视犯罪行为。威尔金森及其同事质疑暂停参与非法抗议的医生的公平，而辛普森则主张破坏基础设施。两封信都淡化了专业问责制和公众信任的重要性……

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Criminal behaviour cannot be excused in the name of activism

Wilkinson and colleagues1 and Simpson2 argue that the General Medical Council should overlook criminal behaviour when it aligns with their personal beliefs. Wilkinson and colleagues question the fairness of suspending a doctor involved in unlawful protests, while Simpson advocates sabotaging infrastructure. Both letters downplay the importance of professional accountability and public trust, …

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The BMJ

自引率

0.00%

发文量