荟萃分析:单独肠内营养治疗溃疡性结肠炎

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Matthew K. W. Chu, Alice S. Day, Lani Broad, Samuel P. Costello, Suzanne Edwards, Robert V. Bryant
{"title":"荟萃分析:单独肠内营养治疗溃疡性结肠炎","authors":"Matthew K. W. Chu,&nbsp;Alice S. Day,&nbsp;Lani Broad,&nbsp;Samuel P. Costello,&nbsp;Suzanne Edwards,&nbsp;Robert V. Bryant","doi":"10.1111/apt.18495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an established dietary therapy for Crohn's disease but its role in ulcerative colitis remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the efficacy of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis and compare variations in treatment protocols, safety, tolerability and adherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Emcare, CINAHL, Web of Science and trial registries for articles published from inception until July 21, 2024. We included all experimental and observational studies that described the use of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022319584).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 3273 articles screened, we included 10 studies (334 adults). Overall, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for ulcerative colitis remission induction (median follow-up 14 days, risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.85; 2 studies). In acute severe ulcerative colitis, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for corticosteroid failure (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48–1.20; 2 studies) or risk of colectomy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51, <i>n</i> = 2 studies) during index admission. The pooled discontinuation rate was 3% (95% CI 0–10; 9 studies). There was heterogeneity in trial design, methodology and assessment of outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>EEN was well tolerated with low therapy discontinuation in adults with active ulcerative colitis. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of EEN as an adjunctive therapy to standard of care. Further, well-designed studies with reproducible methodology and endpoints are necessary to evaluate its effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Registry Number for Systematic Review</h3>\n \n <p>PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022319584.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 5","pages":"756-775"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis\",\"authors\":\"Matthew K. W. Chu,&nbsp;Alice S. Day,&nbsp;Lani Broad,&nbsp;Samuel P. Costello,&nbsp;Suzanne Edwards,&nbsp;Robert V. Bryant\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.18495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an established dietary therapy for Crohn's disease but its role in ulcerative colitis remains unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the efficacy of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis and compare variations in treatment protocols, safety, tolerability and adherence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Emcare, CINAHL, Web of Science and trial registries for articles published from inception until July 21, 2024. We included all experimental and observational studies that described the use of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022319584).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 3273 articles screened, we included 10 studies (334 adults). Overall, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for ulcerative colitis remission induction (median follow-up 14 days, risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.85; 2 studies). In acute severe ulcerative colitis, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for corticosteroid failure (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48–1.20; 2 studies) or risk of colectomy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51, <i>n</i> = 2 studies) during index admission. The pooled discontinuation rate was 3% (95% CI 0–10; 9 studies). There was heterogeneity in trial design, methodology and assessment of outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>EEN was well tolerated with low therapy discontinuation in adults with active ulcerative colitis. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of EEN as an adjunctive therapy to standard of care. Further, well-designed studies with reproducible methodology and endpoints are necessary to evaluate its effectiveness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Registry Number for Systematic Review</h3>\\n \\n <p>PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022319584.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"61 5\",\"pages\":\"756-775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18495\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18495\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纯肠内营养(EEN)是一种治疗克罗恩病的成熟饮食疗法,但它在溃疡性结肠炎中的作用仍不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Meta-Analysis: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis

Meta-Analysis: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis

Meta-Analysis: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an established dietary therapy for Crohn's disease but its role in ulcerative colitis remains unclear.

Aims

To investigate the efficacy of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis and compare variations in treatment protocols, safety, tolerability and adherence.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Emcare, CINAHL, Web of Science and trial registries for articles published from inception until July 21, 2024. We included all experimental and observational studies that described the use of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022319584).

Results

Of 3273 articles screened, we included 10 studies (334 adults). Overall, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for ulcerative colitis remission induction (median follow-up 14 days, risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.85; 2 studies). In acute severe ulcerative colitis, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for corticosteroid failure (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48–1.20; 2 studies) or risk of colectomy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51, n = 2 studies) during index admission. The pooled discontinuation rate was 3% (95% CI 0–10; 9 studies). There was heterogeneity in trial design, methodology and assessment of outcomes.

Conclusion

EEN was well tolerated with low therapy discontinuation in adults with active ulcerative colitis. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of EEN as an adjunctive therapy to standard of care. Further, well-designed studies with reproducible methodology and endpoints are necessary to evaluate its effectiveness.

Registry Number for Systematic Review

PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022319584.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信