Ana Carolina Medina Jimenez , Igor Lucas Rodrigues Dias , Terezinha de Fatima Cardoso , João Luíz Nunes Carvalho , Tassia Lopes Junqueira , Nathalia Meschiatti Magioli , Mateus Ferreira Chagas , Adriano Pinto Mariano , Marcelo Pereira da Cunha , Antonio Bonomi
{"title":"巴西使用和管理甘蔗酒渣的不同方法:技术、经济和环境分析","authors":"Ana Carolina Medina Jimenez , Igor Lucas Rodrigues Dias , Terezinha de Fatima Cardoso , João Luíz Nunes Carvalho , Tassia Lopes Junqueira , Nathalia Meschiatti Magioli , Mateus Ferreira Chagas , Adriano Pinto Mariano , Marcelo Pereira da Cunha , Antonio Bonomi","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sugarcane ethanol production generates various residues, with vinasse being the most voluminous. Due to its high organic matter, potassium, and sulfate content, improper disposal of vinasse can cause significant environmental impacts. Anaerobic biodigestion and vinasse concentration are promising technologies for managing vinasse effectively and harnessing its properties. This study compares three vinasse management approaches: in natura application, vinasse biodigestion with different biogas uses, and vinasse concentration. To enhance environmental accuracy, methane (CH₄) emissions from in natura vinasse transportation channels and fugitive emissions from the biodigestion process–two often overlooked or underestimated emission sources–were considered. Environmental assessments revealed that while most scenarios performed slightly better than the in natura approach, biodigestion scenarios were expected to deliver greater benefits. However, fugitive CH₄ emissions significantly influenced the results, highlighting the need to monitor and mitigate these losses to advance the technology economically and environmentally. The vinasse concentration process emerged as a viable alternative, ranking second in cost-effectiveness, just below biodigestion with diesel substitution scenario. These findings emphasize the potential of this approach to balance economic and environmental benefits, explaining its increasing adoption as a large-scale strategy. The economic analysis revealed that the biodigestion with diesel substitution scenario achieved a slightly higher internal rate of return of 15 % compared to the other scenarios. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis showed that carbon credits sales could further enhance economic performance, contributing approximately 6 % to total revenue. Overall, the study demonstrates the promising potential of vinasse concentration and biodigestion as integrated strategies for sustainable sugarcane ethanol production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 107603"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different approaches to sugarcane vinasse use and management in Brazil: A technical, economic, and environmental analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ana Carolina Medina Jimenez , Igor Lucas Rodrigues Dias , Terezinha de Fatima Cardoso , João Luíz Nunes Carvalho , Tassia Lopes Junqueira , Nathalia Meschiatti Magioli , Mateus Ferreira Chagas , Adriano Pinto Mariano , Marcelo Pereira da Cunha , Antonio Bonomi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sugarcane ethanol production generates various residues, with vinasse being the most voluminous. Due to its high organic matter, potassium, and sulfate content, improper disposal of vinasse can cause significant environmental impacts. Anaerobic biodigestion and vinasse concentration are promising technologies for managing vinasse effectively and harnessing its properties. This study compares three vinasse management approaches: in natura application, vinasse biodigestion with different biogas uses, and vinasse concentration. To enhance environmental accuracy, methane (CH₄) emissions from in natura vinasse transportation channels and fugitive emissions from the biodigestion process–two often overlooked or underestimated emission sources–were considered. Environmental assessments revealed that while most scenarios performed slightly better than the in natura approach, biodigestion scenarios were expected to deliver greater benefits. However, fugitive CH₄ emissions significantly influenced the results, highlighting the need to monitor and mitigate these losses to advance the technology economically and environmentally. The vinasse concentration process emerged as a viable alternative, ranking second in cost-effectiveness, just below biodigestion with diesel substitution scenario. These findings emphasize the potential of this approach to balance economic and environmental benefits, explaining its increasing adoption as a large-scale strategy. The economic analysis revealed that the biodigestion with diesel substitution scenario achieved a slightly higher internal rate of return of 15 % compared to the other scenarios. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis showed that carbon credits sales could further enhance economic performance, contributing approximately 6 % to total revenue. Overall, the study demonstrates the promising potential of vinasse concentration and biodigestion as integrated strategies for sustainable sugarcane ethanol production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425000145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425000145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different approaches to sugarcane vinasse use and management in Brazil: A technical, economic, and environmental analysis
Sugarcane ethanol production generates various residues, with vinasse being the most voluminous. Due to its high organic matter, potassium, and sulfate content, improper disposal of vinasse can cause significant environmental impacts. Anaerobic biodigestion and vinasse concentration are promising technologies for managing vinasse effectively and harnessing its properties. This study compares three vinasse management approaches: in natura application, vinasse biodigestion with different biogas uses, and vinasse concentration. To enhance environmental accuracy, methane (CH₄) emissions from in natura vinasse transportation channels and fugitive emissions from the biodigestion process–two often overlooked or underestimated emission sources–were considered. Environmental assessments revealed that while most scenarios performed slightly better than the in natura approach, biodigestion scenarios were expected to deliver greater benefits. However, fugitive CH₄ emissions significantly influenced the results, highlighting the need to monitor and mitigate these losses to advance the technology economically and environmentally. The vinasse concentration process emerged as a viable alternative, ranking second in cost-effectiveness, just below biodigestion with diesel substitution scenario. These findings emphasize the potential of this approach to balance economic and environmental benefits, explaining its increasing adoption as a large-scale strategy. The economic analysis revealed that the biodigestion with diesel substitution scenario achieved a slightly higher internal rate of return of 15 % compared to the other scenarios. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis showed that carbon credits sales could further enhance economic performance, contributing approximately 6 % to total revenue. Overall, the study demonstrates the promising potential of vinasse concentration and biodigestion as integrated strategies for sustainable sugarcane ethanol production.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.