Jorge Lima-Pérez, César Gálvez, Roberto Montesinos-Matías, Nohemi Garcia-Ortiz, Marco Antonio Mellin-Rosas, Cynthia Coccet Castaneda-Casasola, Jorge Antonio Sánchez-González
{"title":"快速电导率试验为苏云金芽孢杆菌产品的质量评价提供了一种可行的方法","authors":"Jorge Lima-Pérez, César Gálvez, Roberto Montesinos-Matías, Nohemi Garcia-Ortiz, Marco Antonio Mellin-Rosas, Cynthia Coccet Castaneda-Casasola, Jorge Antonio Sánchez-González","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faster and less expensive quality tests are essential for measuring the quality of microbial pesticides formulations for users. In this work, the conductivity of the suspensions of six commercial <ce:italic>Bacillus thuringiensis</ce:italic> products was compared with the International Units of Potency (IU) in labels, the concentration of the pesticide protein, the presence of Cry-type, virulence in the larvae of <ce:italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>Helicoverpa zea</ce:italic>, spore and total viability, the presence of bacterial contaminants, pH, and humidity to establish relationships. The results showed that XenTari® had more viable spores (>4.5 × 10<ce:sup loc=\"post\">10</ce:sup> spores • mL<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>), and Agree® had the most total viable cells. Dipel®, Agree®, and XenTari® had the most pesticide protein (>40,000 μg mL<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>). The Cry-type 1 pesticide protein was present in Agree®, XenTari®, Turinsil®, and BtKrone®, and only Dipel® contained Cry-type 1 and type 2. Regarding virulence, a survival lower than 2.6% was obtained with Agree®, BtKrone®, DiPel®, and XenTari® products when <ce:italic>S</ce:italic>. <ce:italic>frugiperda</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>H</ce:italic>. <ce:italic>zea</ce:italic> larvae were used in the bioassay. Interestingly, while Bacimín® had the highest IU label claim, the pesticide protein and mortality of <ce:italic>S</ce:italic>. <ce:italic>frugiperda</ce:italic> larvae were not observed. However, viable cells and spores were detected at the lowest concentration (<2 × 10<ce:sup loc=\"post\">7</ce:sup> spores • g<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>). These results were useful for classifying products into null, medium, and high quality categories and establishing relationships with conductivity. An important relationship was found between conductivity and protein concentration (R<ce:sup loc=\"post\">2</ce:sup> > 0.85) or survival (R<ce:sup loc=\"post\">2</ce:sup> > 0.81). Our findings showed that conductivity predicts the quality and performance of commercial <ce:italic>B. thuringiensis</ce:italic> products, suggesting that this method is a faster and more reliable quality test that can be easily used by farmers.","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A rapid conductivity test offers a viable method to assess the quality of Bacillus thuringiensis products\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Lima-Pérez, César Gálvez, Roberto Montesinos-Matías, Nohemi Garcia-Ortiz, Marco Antonio Mellin-Rosas, Cynthia Coccet Castaneda-Casasola, Jorge Antonio Sánchez-González\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Faster and less expensive quality tests are essential for measuring the quality of microbial pesticides formulations for users. In this work, the conductivity of the suspensions of six commercial <ce:italic>Bacillus thuringiensis</ce:italic> products was compared with the International Units of Potency (IU) in labels, the concentration of the pesticide protein, the presence of Cry-type, virulence in the larvae of <ce:italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>Helicoverpa zea</ce:italic>, spore and total viability, the presence of bacterial contaminants, pH, and humidity to establish relationships. The results showed that XenTari® had more viable spores (>4.5 × 10<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">10</ce:sup> spores • mL<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">−1</ce:sup>), and Agree® had the most total viable cells. Dipel®, Agree®, and XenTari® had the most pesticide protein (>40,000 μg mL<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">−1</ce:sup>). The Cry-type 1 pesticide protein was present in Agree®, XenTari®, Turinsil®, and BtKrone®, and only Dipel® contained Cry-type 1 and type 2. Regarding virulence, a survival lower than 2.6% was obtained with Agree®, BtKrone®, DiPel®, and XenTari® products when <ce:italic>S</ce:italic>. <ce:italic>frugiperda</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>H</ce:italic>. <ce:italic>zea</ce:italic> larvae were used in the bioassay. Interestingly, while Bacimín® had the highest IU label claim, the pesticide protein and mortality of <ce:italic>S</ce:italic>. <ce:italic>frugiperda</ce:italic> larvae were not observed. However, viable cells and spores were detected at the lowest concentration (<2 × 10<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">7</ce:sup> spores • g<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">−1</ce:sup>). These results were useful for classifying products into null, medium, and high quality categories and establishing relationships with conductivity. An important relationship was found between conductivity and protein concentration (R<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:sup> > 0.85) or survival (R<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:sup> > 0.81). Our findings showed that conductivity predicts the quality and performance of commercial <ce:italic>B. thuringiensis</ce:italic> products, suggesting that this method is a faster and more reliable quality test that can be easily used by farmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107109\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A rapid conductivity test offers a viable method to assess the quality of Bacillus thuringiensis products
Faster and less expensive quality tests are essential for measuring the quality of microbial pesticides formulations for users. In this work, the conductivity of the suspensions of six commercial Bacillus thuringiensis products was compared with the International Units of Potency (IU) in labels, the concentration of the pesticide protein, the presence of Cry-type, virulence in the larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda and Helicoverpa zea, spore and total viability, the presence of bacterial contaminants, pH, and humidity to establish relationships. The results showed that XenTari® had more viable spores (>4.5 × 1010 spores • mL−1), and Agree® had the most total viable cells. Dipel®, Agree®, and XenTari® had the most pesticide protein (>40,000 μg mL−1). The Cry-type 1 pesticide protein was present in Agree®, XenTari®, Turinsil®, and BtKrone®, and only Dipel® contained Cry-type 1 and type 2. Regarding virulence, a survival lower than 2.6% was obtained with Agree®, BtKrone®, DiPel®, and XenTari® products when S. frugiperda and H. zea larvae were used in the bioassay. Interestingly, while Bacimín® had the highest IU label claim, the pesticide protein and mortality of S. frugiperda larvae were not observed. However, viable cells and spores were detected at the lowest concentration (<2 × 107 spores • g−1). These results were useful for classifying products into null, medium, and high quality categories and establishing relationships with conductivity. An important relationship was found between conductivity and protein concentration (R2 > 0.85) or survival (R2 > 0.81). Our findings showed that conductivity predicts the quality and performance of commercial B. thuringiensis products, suggesting that this method is a faster and more reliable quality test that can be easily used by farmers.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.