Pamela Suellen Salvador Dutra, Yi Huang, Tiago De Paula Lelis, Romina Gazis, Jonathan H. Crane, Shouan Zhang
{"title":"人工合成杀菌剂和植物基杀菌剂对龙果溃疡病的体外敏感性和田间药效比较","authors":"Pamela Suellen Salvador Dutra, Yi Huang, Tiago De Paula Lelis, Romina Gazis, Jonathan H. Crane, Shouan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dragon Fruit Canker (DFC), caused by <ce:italic>Neoscytalidium dimidiatum</ce:italic>, threatens the profitability of the dragon fruit industry worldwide. In the U.S., the number of fungicides registered for this crop is limited, challenging the effective control of DFC, particularly in South Florida, where frequent outbreaks occur. This study evaluated the <ce:italic>in vitro</ce:italic> sensitivity of <ce:italic>N. dimidiatum</ce:italic> isolates to 13 synthetic and four plant-based fungicides and assessed the efficacy of the most promising candidates on detached fruit and in field trials. The synthetic fungicides fluazinam, fludioxonil, difenoconazole, propiconazole, tebuconazole, and azoxystrobin had the lowest effective concentration values (EC<ce:inf loc=\"post\">50</ce:inf>), ranging from 0.01 μg/ml to 1.48 μg/ml, indicating strong inhibition of mycelial growth <ce:italic>in vitro</ce:italic> at minimal concentrations. In contrast, the plant-based fungicides thyme oil and garlic oil demonstrated higher EC<ce:inf loc=\"post\">50</ce:inf> values (35.38 μg/ml and 37.10 μg/ml, respectively) and proved ineffective in preventing DFC symptoms in detached fruit assays. Tebuconazole was one of the most effective chemicals in detached fruit assays, with over 95% efficacy in controlling DFC, but its effectiveness decreased to 50% in the field. Field trials revealed that fluazinam was the most effective fungicide tested, reducing DFC severity in fruits by 93%. Fungicide effectiveness was lower on stems than fruits, with none exceeding 65% efficacy in the field. This is the first study to investigate the sensitivity of <ce:italic>N. dimidiatum</ce:italic> isolates to multiple fungicides in the U.S. Given its superior performance in field trials, fluazinam is a promising candidate for DFC control and should be considered further for registration in the country.","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro sensitivity and field effectiveness of synthetic and plant-based fungicides against dragon fruit canker caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Suellen Salvador Dutra, Yi Huang, Tiago De Paula Lelis, Romina Gazis, Jonathan H. Crane, Shouan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dragon Fruit Canker (DFC), caused by <ce:italic>Neoscytalidium dimidiatum</ce:italic>, threatens the profitability of the dragon fruit industry worldwide. In the U.S., the number of fungicides registered for this crop is limited, challenging the effective control of DFC, particularly in South Florida, where frequent outbreaks occur. This study evaluated the <ce:italic>in vitro</ce:italic> sensitivity of <ce:italic>N. dimidiatum</ce:italic> isolates to 13 synthetic and four plant-based fungicides and assessed the efficacy of the most promising candidates on detached fruit and in field trials. The synthetic fungicides fluazinam, fludioxonil, difenoconazole, propiconazole, tebuconazole, and azoxystrobin had the lowest effective concentration values (EC<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">50</ce:inf>), ranging from 0.01 μg/ml to 1.48 μg/ml, indicating strong inhibition of mycelial growth <ce:italic>in vitro</ce:italic> at minimal concentrations. In contrast, the plant-based fungicides thyme oil and garlic oil demonstrated higher EC<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">50</ce:inf> values (35.38 μg/ml and 37.10 μg/ml, respectively) and proved ineffective in preventing DFC symptoms in detached fruit assays. Tebuconazole was one of the most effective chemicals in detached fruit assays, with over 95% efficacy in controlling DFC, but its effectiveness decreased to 50% in the field. Field trials revealed that fluazinam was the most effective fungicide tested, reducing DFC severity in fruits by 93%. Fungicide effectiveness was lower on stems than fruits, with none exceeding 65% efficacy in the field. This is the first study to investigate the sensitivity of <ce:italic>N. dimidiatum</ce:italic> isolates to multiple fungicides in the U.S. Given its superior performance in field trials, fluazinam is a promising candidate for DFC control and should be considered further for registration in the country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
In vitro sensitivity and field effectiveness of synthetic and plant-based fungicides against dragon fruit canker caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum
Dragon Fruit Canker (DFC), caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, threatens the profitability of the dragon fruit industry worldwide. In the U.S., the number of fungicides registered for this crop is limited, challenging the effective control of DFC, particularly in South Florida, where frequent outbreaks occur. This study evaluated the in vitro sensitivity of N. dimidiatum isolates to 13 synthetic and four plant-based fungicides and assessed the efficacy of the most promising candidates on detached fruit and in field trials. The synthetic fungicides fluazinam, fludioxonil, difenoconazole, propiconazole, tebuconazole, and azoxystrobin had the lowest effective concentration values (EC50), ranging from 0.01 μg/ml to 1.48 μg/ml, indicating strong inhibition of mycelial growth in vitro at minimal concentrations. In contrast, the plant-based fungicides thyme oil and garlic oil demonstrated higher EC50 values (35.38 μg/ml and 37.10 μg/ml, respectively) and proved ineffective in preventing DFC symptoms in detached fruit assays. Tebuconazole was one of the most effective chemicals in detached fruit assays, with over 95% efficacy in controlling DFC, but its effectiveness decreased to 50% in the field. Field trials revealed that fluazinam was the most effective fungicide tested, reducing DFC severity in fruits by 93%. Fungicide effectiveness was lower on stems than fruits, with none exceeding 65% efficacy in the field. This is the first study to investigate the sensitivity of N. dimidiatum isolates to multiple fungicides in the U.S. Given its superior performance in field trials, fluazinam is a promising candidate for DFC control and should be considered further for registration in the country.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.