减少参与血浆置换捐献的阻碍:实验性传单的评估。

Antoine Beurel-Tréhan, Florence Terrade, Jean-Pierre Lebaudy, Bruno Danic
{"title":"减少参与血浆置换捐献的阻碍:实验性传单的评估。","authors":"Antoine Beurel-Tréhan, Florence Terrade, Jean-Pierre Lebaudy, Bruno Danic","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to measure the psychometrics qualities of an extended model of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) applied to plasma donation, and its relevance in the evaluation of interventions aiming at converting whole-blood donors (WBD) to plasma donation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two studies were conducted. The first (N = 433) compared the efficacy of two communication strategies (standard strategy centered on motivations to donate vs. experimental strategy centered on barriers to donate) for influencing specific determinants of the extended model of the TPB and for engaging WBD in plasma donation. The second study (N = 309) evaluated the gain of adding to the experimental strategy an implementation intentions protocol to facilitate the behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 showed the relevance of the extended model as a measurement tool of intention's determinants, and the efficacy of the experimental strategy compared to the standard approach to bolster intention, F(2,430) = 7.03, p < 0.001, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.032, and to increase the likelihood of commitments χ2(2, N = 433) = 11.904, p = 0.003, Cramer's V = 0.17. Study 2 replicated these results but did not demonstrate any effect of the implementation intentions protocol to strengthen the intervention, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, N = 188) = 1.341, p = 0.25.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These studies showed that addressing barriers to donation is an efficient communication and recruitment strategy. We encourage blood collection agencies to develop communication campaigns in this direction rather than focusing on donors motivations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94255,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing deterrents to engage in plasmapheresis donation: Evaluation of an experimental flyer.\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Beurel-Tréhan, Florence Terrade, Jean-Pierre Lebaudy, Bruno Danic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tracli.2025.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to measure the psychometrics qualities of an extended model of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) applied to plasma donation, and its relevance in the evaluation of interventions aiming at converting whole-blood donors (WBD) to plasma donation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two studies were conducted. The first (N = 433) compared the efficacy of two communication strategies (standard strategy centered on motivations to donate vs. experimental strategy centered on barriers to donate) for influencing specific determinants of the extended model of the TPB and for engaging WBD in plasma donation. The second study (N = 309) evaluated the gain of adding to the experimental strategy an implementation intentions protocol to facilitate the behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 showed the relevance of the extended model as a measurement tool of intention's determinants, and the efficacy of the experimental strategy compared to the standard approach to bolster intention, F(2,430) = 7.03, p < 0.001, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.032, and to increase the likelihood of commitments χ2(2, N = 433) = 11.904, p = 0.003, Cramer's V = 0.17. Study 2 replicated these results but did not demonstrate any effect of the implementation intentions protocol to strengthen the intervention, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, N = 188) = 1.341, p = 0.25.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These studies showed that addressing barriers to donation is an efficient communication and recruitment strategy. We encourage blood collection agencies to develop communication campaigns in this direction rather than focusing on donors motivations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2025.01.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2025.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在测量计划行为理论(TPB)应用于血浆捐献的扩展模型的心理测量学质量,及其在旨在将全血献血者(WBD)转化为血浆捐献的干预措施评估中的相关性。方法:进行两项研究。第一项研究(N= 433)比较了两种沟通策略(以捐赠动机为中心的标准策略与以捐赠障碍为中心的实验策略)在影响TPB扩展模型的特定决定因素和让WBD参与血浆捐赠方面的效果。第二项研究(N= 309)评估了在实验策略中加入实施意图协议以促进行为的收益。结果:研究1显示了扩展模型作为意向决定因素的测量工具的相关性,与标准方法相比,实验策略在增强意向方面的有效性,F(2,430)= 7.03, p< 0.001,偏η2= 0.032,并增加承诺可能性χ2(2, N= 433)= 11.904, p= 0.003, Cramer's V= 0.17。研究2重复了这些结果,但没有证明实施意图方案对加强干预有任何影响,χ2(1, N= 188)= 1.341, p= 0.25。结论:这些研究表明,解决捐赠障碍是一种有效的沟通和招募策略。我们鼓励采血机构在这方面开展宣传活动,而不是侧重于献血者的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing deterrents to engage in plasmapheresis donation: Evaluation of an experimental flyer.

Objectives: This study aimed to measure the psychometrics qualities of an extended model of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) applied to plasma donation, and its relevance in the evaluation of interventions aiming at converting whole-blood donors (WBD) to plasma donation.

Methods: Two studies were conducted. The first (N = 433) compared the efficacy of two communication strategies (standard strategy centered on motivations to donate vs. experimental strategy centered on barriers to donate) for influencing specific determinants of the extended model of the TPB and for engaging WBD in plasma donation. The second study (N = 309) evaluated the gain of adding to the experimental strategy an implementation intentions protocol to facilitate the behavior.

Results: Study 1 showed the relevance of the extended model as a measurement tool of intention's determinants, and the efficacy of the experimental strategy compared to the standard approach to bolster intention, F(2,430) = 7.03, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.032, and to increase the likelihood of commitments χ2(2, N = 433) = 11.904, p = 0.003, Cramer's V = 0.17. Study 2 replicated these results but did not demonstrate any effect of the implementation intentions protocol to strengthen the intervention, χ2(1, N = 188) = 1.341, p = 0.25.

Conclusions: These studies showed that addressing barriers to donation is an efficient communication and recruitment strategy. We encourage blood collection agencies to develop communication campaigns in this direction rather than focusing on donors motivations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信