头孢克肟和益生菌对功能性腹胀的影响:一项初步研究。

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.5114/pg.2024.142141
Rasha I Salama, Salwa Tawfik, Mohamed H Emara, Abeer H Abdelkader
{"title":"头孢克肟和益生菌对功能性腹胀的影响:一项初步研究。","authors":"Rasha I Salama, Salwa Tawfik, Mohamed H Emara, Abeer H Abdelkader","doi":"10.5114/pg.2024.142141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abdominal bloating is a prevalent condition that affects up to 30% of the population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate the impact of cefixime and probiotics on the bloating sensation among patients with functional abdominal bloating (FAB).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Out of 763 patients with bloating, 122 patients were diagnosed with FAB. Group I (<i>n</i> = 40) were treated with a combination of non-activated herbal charcoal and silicone dioxide with dimethylpolysiloxane (conventional treatment group); group II (<i>n</i> = 41) were treated by the same lines as in group I with the addition of cefixime 400 mg once daily for 6 days; and group III (<i>n</i> = 41) were treated by the same lines given to group I with the addition of a probiotic formulation harbouring the probiotic strain <i>Lactobacillus helveticus candisis</i> for 2 weeks. All patients were evaluated by history taking, clinical examination, laboratory assessment, relevant imaging, and symptom questionnaire before and by the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of FAB was 15.9% (122/763). The majority were females (58.1%). Patients treated with probiotics and cefixime reported significant improvement in the sense of bloating and the visible abdominal distension in comparison to conventional treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.008 and < 0.001, respectively). Abdominal pain, belching, bowel habit change, and nausea improved and were comparable among the 3 groups by the end of treatment. No adverse events related to the used medications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cefixime and probiotics exert significant improvement in the subjective sensation of bloating and objective abdominal distension among patients with FAB in comparison to conventional anti-flatulence therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20719,"journal":{"name":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","volume":"16 4","pages":"408-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of cefixime and probiotics on functional abdominal bloating: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Rasha I Salama, Salwa Tawfik, Mohamed H Emara, Abeer H Abdelkader\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pg.2024.142141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abdominal bloating is a prevalent condition that affects up to 30% of the population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate the impact of cefixime and probiotics on the bloating sensation among patients with functional abdominal bloating (FAB).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Out of 763 patients with bloating, 122 patients were diagnosed with FAB. Group I (<i>n</i> = 40) were treated with a combination of non-activated herbal charcoal and silicone dioxide with dimethylpolysiloxane (conventional treatment group); group II (<i>n</i> = 41) were treated by the same lines as in group I with the addition of cefixime 400 mg once daily for 6 days; and group III (<i>n</i> = 41) were treated by the same lines given to group I with the addition of a probiotic formulation harbouring the probiotic strain <i>Lactobacillus helveticus candisis</i> for 2 weeks. All patients were evaluated by history taking, clinical examination, laboratory assessment, relevant imaging, and symptom questionnaire before and by the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of FAB was 15.9% (122/763). The majority were females (58.1%). Patients treated with probiotics and cefixime reported significant improvement in the sense of bloating and the visible abdominal distension in comparison to conventional treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.008 and < 0.001, respectively). Abdominal pain, belching, bowel habit change, and nausea improved and were comparable among the 3 groups by the end of treatment. No adverse events related to the used medications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cefixime and probiotics exert significant improvement in the subjective sensation of bloating and objective abdominal distension among patients with FAB in comparison to conventional anti-flatulence therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"408-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2024.142141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2024.142141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介目的:研究头孢克肟和益生菌对功能性腹胀(FAB)患者腹胀感觉的影响:在763名腹胀患者中,122名患者被诊断为功能性腹胀。第一组(n = 40)采用非活性草炭和二氧化硅与二甲基聚硅氧烷的组合疗法(常规治疗组);第二组(n = 41)采用与第一组相同的疗法,同时添加头孢克肟 400 毫克,每日一次,连续 6 天;第三组(n = 41)采用与第一组相同的疗法,同时添加含有益生菌株 helveticus Lactobacillus candis 的益生菌配方,连续 2 周。所有患者在治疗前和治疗结束后都接受了病史采集、临床检查、实验室评估、相关影像学检查和症状问卷调查:结果:FAB的发病率为15.9%(122/763)。大多数患者为女性(58.1%)。与常规治疗相比,使用益生菌和头孢克肟治疗的患者腹胀感和明显腹胀症状均有明显改善(p = 0.008 和 < 0.001)。治疗结束时,腹痛、嗳气、排便习惯改变和恶心症状均有所改善,三组患者的改善程度相当。没有观察到与所用药物相关的不良反应:结论:与传统的消胀疗法相比,头孢克肟和益生菌能显著改善 FAB 患者的主观腹胀感和客观腹胀感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of cefixime and probiotics on functional abdominal bloating: a pilot study.

Introduction: Abdominal bloating is a prevalent condition that affects up to 30% of the population.

Aim: Investigate the impact of cefixime and probiotics on the bloating sensation among patients with functional abdominal bloating (FAB).

Material and methods: Out of 763 patients with bloating, 122 patients were diagnosed with FAB. Group I (n = 40) were treated with a combination of non-activated herbal charcoal and silicone dioxide with dimethylpolysiloxane (conventional treatment group); group II (n = 41) were treated by the same lines as in group I with the addition of cefixime 400 mg once daily for 6 days; and group III (n = 41) were treated by the same lines given to group I with the addition of a probiotic formulation harbouring the probiotic strain Lactobacillus helveticus candisis for 2 weeks. All patients were evaluated by history taking, clinical examination, laboratory assessment, relevant imaging, and symptom questionnaire before and by the end of treatment.

Results: The prevalence of FAB was 15.9% (122/763). The majority were females (58.1%). Patients treated with probiotics and cefixime reported significant improvement in the sense of bloating and the visible abdominal distension in comparison to conventional treatment (p = 0.008 and < 0.001, respectively). Abdominal pain, belching, bowel habit change, and nausea improved and were comparable among the 3 groups by the end of treatment. No adverse events related to the used medications were observed.

Conclusions: Cefixime and probiotics exert significant improvement in the subjective sensation of bloating and objective abdominal distension among patients with FAB in comparison to conventional anti-flatulence therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Review is a journal published each 2 months, aimed at gastroenterologists and general practitioners. Published under the patronage of Consultant in Gastroenterology and Polish Pancreatic Club.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信