Francisco Soldado, Diego Gonzalez-Morgado, Pablo Romero-Larrauri, Trong-Quynh Nguyen, Antonio Carlos da Costa, Jorge Knorr
{"title":"带血管的骨膜移植用于儿童骨愈合:系统综述。","authors":"Francisco Soldado, Diego Gonzalez-Morgado, Pablo Romero-Larrauri, Trong-Quynh Nguyen, Antonio Carlos da Costa, Jorge Knorr","doi":"10.1002/micr.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The periosteum is the main organ responsible for bone regeneration. Vascularized Periosteal Grafts (VPG) have demonstrated exceptional efficacy and speed in facilitating bone union among children with challenging bone healing conditions. Despite their promising results, the overall impact of these interventions has yet to be comprehensively evaluated through systematic review. This systematic review aimed to provide comprehensive insights into bone union outcomes and complications related to the use of VPG in children.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to September 2023 and screened for relevant studies. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, disease, treatment, anatomical location, graft used, donor and receptor vessels, skin paddle monitoring, follow-up duration, time to union, consolidation, and complications. The correlation between age and bone union was assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, as appropriate. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies Criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies involving 135 patients were included. All the studies were classified as Level 4 evidence. The mean MINORS score was 5.1 ± 1. The aim of the VPG was nonunion treatment in 90 patients (67%), nonunion prevention in 35 patients (26%), and bone union acceleration in 10 patients (7%). The origin of the bone union problem was traumatic in 59 cases (44%), congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia or fibula in 48 patients (35%), oncologic in 23 patients (17%), and infectious in 5 patients (4%). Nine different sources of periosteal flaps were used to enhance bone union. Bone union rate was 96% with a mean time of 4.2 months (range 1-18 months). Spearman test showed a non-statistically significant negative correlation between age and bone union time (r = -0.3, p = 0.759).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VPGs are a safe and reliable treatment for promoting bone union, especially in the context of complex pediatric bone-healing challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"e70021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascularized Periosteal Grafts for Bone Union in Children: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Soldado, Diego Gonzalez-Morgado, Pablo Romero-Larrauri, Trong-Quynh Nguyen, Antonio Carlos da Costa, Jorge Knorr\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The periosteum is the main organ responsible for bone regeneration. Vascularized Periosteal Grafts (VPG) have demonstrated exceptional efficacy and speed in facilitating bone union among children with challenging bone healing conditions. Despite their promising results, the overall impact of these interventions has yet to be comprehensively evaluated through systematic review. This systematic review aimed to provide comprehensive insights into bone union outcomes and complications related to the use of VPG in children.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to September 2023 and screened for relevant studies. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, disease, treatment, anatomical location, graft used, donor and receptor vessels, skin paddle monitoring, follow-up duration, time to union, consolidation, and complications. The correlation between age and bone union was assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, as appropriate. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies Criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies involving 135 patients were included. All the studies were classified as Level 4 evidence. The mean MINORS score was 5.1 ± 1. The aim of the VPG was nonunion treatment in 90 patients (67%), nonunion prevention in 35 patients (26%), and bone union acceleration in 10 patients (7%). The origin of the bone union problem was traumatic in 59 cases (44%), congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia or fibula in 48 patients (35%), oncologic in 23 patients (17%), and infectious in 5 patients (4%). Nine different sources of periosteal flaps were used to enhance bone union. Bone union rate was 96% with a mean time of 4.2 months (range 1-18 months). Spearman test showed a non-statistically significant negative correlation between age and bone union time (r = -0.3, p = 0.759).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VPGs are a safe and reliable treatment for promoting bone union, especially in the context of complex pediatric bone-healing challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"e70021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.70021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:骨膜是骨再生的主要器官。血管化骨膜移植物(VPG)在促进具有挑战性骨愈合条件的儿童骨愈合方面表现出卓越的疗效和速度。尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但这些干预措施的总体影响尚未通过系统审查进行全面评估。本系统综述旨在提供与儿童使用VPG相关的骨愈合结果和并发症的全面见解。材料和方法:检索MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Clinicaltrials.gov和Cochrane Library,检索自数据库建立至2023年9月的相关研究。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学、疾病、治疗、解剖位置、使用的移植物、供体和受体血管、皮肤叶片监测、随访时间、愈合时间、巩固时间和并发症。使用Pearson和Spearman相关系数评估年龄与骨愈合之间的相关性。采用非随机研究标准方法学指数评估研究质量。结果:共纳入15项研究,共纳入135例患者。所有的研究都被归类为4级证据。平均评分为5.1±1分。VPG的目的是治疗90例(67%)骨不连,预防35例(26%)骨不连,加速10例(7%)骨不连。骨愈合问题的来源为外伤性59例(44%),先天性胫骨或腓骨假关节48例(35%),肿瘤23例(17%),感染性5例(4%)。九种不同来源的骨膜瓣用于增强骨愈合。骨愈合率96%,平均时间4.2个月(1 ~ 18个月)。Spearman检验显示年龄与骨愈合时间呈无统计学意义的负相关(r = -0.3, p = 0.759)。结论:VPGs是一种安全可靠的促进骨愈合的治疗方法,特别是在复杂的儿童骨愈合挑战的背景下。
Vascularized Periosteal Grafts for Bone Union in Children: A Systematic Review.
Background: The periosteum is the main organ responsible for bone regeneration. Vascularized Periosteal Grafts (VPG) have demonstrated exceptional efficacy and speed in facilitating bone union among children with challenging bone healing conditions. Despite their promising results, the overall impact of these interventions has yet to be comprehensively evaluated through systematic review. This systematic review aimed to provide comprehensive insights into bone union outcomes and complications related to the use of VPG in children.
Materials and methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to September 2023 and screened for relevant studies. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, disease, treatment, anatomical location, graft used, donor and receptor vessels, skin paddle monitoring, follow-up duration, time to union, consolidation, and complications. The correlation between age and bone union was assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, as appropriate. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies Criteria.
Results: A total of 15 studies involving 135 patients were included. All the studies were classified as Level 4 evidence. The mean MINORS score was 5.1 ± 1. The aim of the VPG was nonunion treatment in 90 patients (67%), nonunion prevention in 35 patients (26%), and bone union acceleration in 10 patients (7%). The origin of the bone union problem was traumatic in 59 cases (44%), congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia or fibula in 48 patients (35%), oncologic in 23 patients (17%), and infectious in 5 patients (4%). Nine different sources of periosteal flaps were used to enhance bone union. Bone union rate was 96% with a mean time of 4.2 months (range 1-18 months). Spearman test showed a non-statistically significant negative correlation between age and bone union time (r = -0.3, p = 0.759).
Conclusions: VPGs are a safe and reliable treatment for promoting bone union, especially in the context of complex pediatric bone-healing challenges.
期刊介绍:
Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.