用于辐射剂量测定的环氧树脂和 PMMA 模型中的组织-空气比率评估:实验测量和蒙特卡罗模拟的结果。

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Hamza Sekkat, Abdellah Khallouqi, Omar El Rhazouani, Abdellah Halimi
{"title":"用于辐射剂量测定的环氧树脂和 PMMA 模型中的组织-空气比率评估:实验测量和蒙特卡罗模拟的结果。","authors":"Hamza Sekkat, Abdellah Khallouqi, Omar El Rhazouani, Abdellah Halimi","doi":"10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assesses radiation doses in multi-slice computed tomography (CT) using epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms, focusing on the relationship between TAR (tissue air ratio) and kilovoltage peak (kVp). The research was conducted using a Hitachi Supria 16-slice CT scanner. An epoxy resin phantom was fabricated from commercially available materials, to simulate human tissue. The phantom contained four peripheral inserts and one central insert for dose measurement, with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters positioned at various depths (2 to 10 cm). Monte Carlo simulations were executed using the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission toolkit (GATE) to model photon transport, with the x-ray spectrum generated using SpekPy software. A non-linear fitting model was developed to describe the TAR-kVp relationship across different depths for epoxy resin and PMMA. Results indicated that TAR values were higher at low depths (2 cm) and decreased with increasing depth, reflecting the x-ray beam's attenuation. For instance, at 80 kVp and 2 cm depth, the experimental TAR for PMMA was 1.102 ± 0.011, closely matching the MC simulation value of 1.110 ± 0.036, resulting in a small difference of 0.7%. At a depth of 10 cm, the experimental TAR for PMMA decreased to 0.245 ± 0.006, while the MC TAR was 0.248 ± 0.016, with a relative difference of 1.2%. Similar trends were observed for epoxy resin, where the experimental TAR ranged from 1.070 ± 0.014 at 2 cm to 0.235 ± 0.009 at 10 cm, while MC simulation values ranged from 1.080 ± 0.038 to 0.238 ± 0.017. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed these results, with mean differences of 0.008 for PMMA and 0.006 for epoxy resin, indicating high agreement between the experimental and simulated TAR values. This study highlights the importance of phantom material selection in dose assessment and the implications of TAR in dose correction within the context of diagnostic radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":21002,"journal":{"name":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of tissue-air ratios in epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms for radiation dosimetry: findings from experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.\",\"authors\":\"Hamza Sekkat, Abdellah Khallouqi, Omar El Rhazouani, Abdellah Halimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assesses radiation doses in multi-slice computed tomography (CT) using epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms, focusing on the relationship between TAR (tissue air ratio) and kilovoltage peak (kVp). The research was conducted using a Hitachi Supria 16-slice CT scanner. An epoxy resin phantom was fabricated from commercially available materials, to simulate human tissue. The phantom contained four peripheral inserts and one central insert for dose measurement, with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters positioned at various depths (2 to 10 cm). Monte Carlo simulations were executed using the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission toolkit (GATE) to model photon transport, with the x-ray spectrum generated using SpekPy software. A non-linear fitting model was developed to describe the TAR-kVp relationship across different depths for epoxy resin and PMMA. Results indicated that TAR values were higher at low depths (2 cm) and decreased with increasing depth, reflecting the x-ray beam's attenuation. For instance, at 80 kVp and 2 cm depth, the experimental TAR for PMMA was 1.102 ± 0.011, closely matching the MC simulation value of 1.110 ± 0.036, resulting in a small difference of 0.7%. At a depth of 10 cm, the experimental TAR for PMMA decreased to 0.245 ± 0.006, while the MC TAR was 0.248 ± 0.016, with a relative difference of 1.2%. Similar trends were observed for epoxy resin, where the experimental TAR ranged from 1.070 ± 0.014 at 2 cm to 0.235 ± 0.009 at 10 cm, while MC simulation values ranged from 1.080 ± 0.038 to 0.238 ± 0.017. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed these results, with mean differences of 0.008 for PMMA and 0.006 for epoxy resin, indicating high agreement between the experimental and simulated TAR values. This study highlights the importance of phantom material selection in dose assessment and the implications of TAR in dose correction within the context of diagnostic radiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用环氧树脂和PMMA模型评估多层计算机断层扫描(CT)的辐射剂量,重点研究了组织空气比(TAR)和千伏电压峰值(kVp)之间的关系。研究使用日立Supria 16层CT扫描仪进行。用市售材料制造了一个环氧树脂模型来模拟人体组织。幻影包含四个外围插入和一个中心插入,用于剂量测量,光学刺激的发光剂量计位于不同深度(2至10厘米)。使用Geant4应用程序层析发射工具包(GATE)进行蒙特卡罗模拟以模拟光子传输,使用SpekPy软件生成x射线光谱。建立了一个非线性拟合模型来描述环氧树脂和PMMA在不同深度上的TAR-kVp关系。结果表明,TAR值在低深度(2 cm)处较高,随深度增加而降低,反映了x射线束的衰减。例如,在80 kVp和2 cm深度下,PMMA的实验TAR为1.102±0.011,与MC模拟值1.110±0.036非常接近,相差只有0.7%。在10 cm深度,PMMA的实验TAR为0.245±0.006,MC的实验TAR为0.248±0.016,相对差异为1.2%。环氧树脂的实验TAR值在2 cm处为1.070±0.014至10 cm处为0.235±0.009,而MC模拟值在1.080±0.038至0.238±0.017之间。Bland-Altman分析证实了这些结果,PMMA的平均差异为0.008,环氧树脂的平均差异为0.006,表明实验和模拟的TAR值高度一致。本研究强调了剂量评估中幻影材料选择的重要性,以及放射诊断学背景下TAR在剂量校正中的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of tissue-air ratios in epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms for radiation dosimetry: findings from experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.

This study assesses radiation doses in multi-slice computed tomography (CT) using epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms, focusing on the relationship between TAR (tissue air ratio) and kilovoltage peak (kVp). The research was conducted using a Hitachi Supria 16-slice CT scanner. An epoxy resin phantom was fabricated from commercially available materials, to simulate human tissue. The phantom contained four peripheral inserts and one central insert for dose measurement, with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters positioned at various depths (2 to 10 cm). Monte Carlo simulations were executed using the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission toolkit (GATE) to model photon transport, with the x-ray spectrum generated using SpekPy software. A non-linear fitting model was developed to describe the TAR-kVp relationship across different depths for epoxy resin and PMMA. Results indicated that TAR values were higher at low depths (2 cm) and decreased with increasing depth, reflecting the x-ray beam's attenuation. For instance, at 80 kVp and 2 cm depth, the experimental TAR for PMMA was 1.102 ± 0.011, closely matching the MC simulation value of 1.110 ± 0.036, resulting in a small difference of 0.7%. At a depth of 10 cm, the experimental TAR for PMMA decreased to 0.245 ± 0.006, while the MC TAR was 0.248 ± 0.016, with a relative difference of 1.2%. Similar trends were observed for epoxy resin, where the experimental TAR ranged from 1.070 ± 0.014 at 2 cm to 0.235 ± 0.009 at 10 cm, while MC simulation values ranged from 1.080 ± 0.038 to 0.238 ± 0.017. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed these results, with mean differences of 0.008 for PMMA and 0.006 for epoxy resin, indicating high agreement between the experimental and simulated TAR values. This study highlights the importance of phantom material selection in dose assessment and the implications of TAR in dose correction within the context of diagnostic radiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to fundamental and applied issues in radiation research and biophysics. The topics may include: Biophysics of ionizing radiation: radiation physics and chemistry, radiation dosimetry, radiobiology, radioecology, biophysical foundations of medical applications of radiation, and radiation protection. Biological effects of radiation: experimental or theoretical work on molecular or cellular effects; relevance of biological effects for risk assessment; biological effects of medical applications of radiation; relevance of radiation for biosphere and in space; modelling of ecosystems; modelling of transport processes of substances in biotic systems. Risk assessment: epidemiological studies of cancer and non-cancer effects; quantification of risk including exposures to radiation and confounding factors Contributions to these topics may include theoretical-mathematical and experimental material, as well as description of new techniques relevant for the study of these issues. They can range from complex radiobiological phenomena to issues in health physics and environmental protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信