24小时饮食或运动引起的能量供应操纵对底物利用和表现的影响

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Ella S Smith, Megan Kuikman, Jonathon Weakley, Nicolin Tee, Rachel McCormick, Kathryn E Ackerman, Kirsty J Elliott-Sale, Trent Stellingwerff, Rachel Harris, Alannah K A McKay, Louise M Burke
{"title":"24小时饮食或运动引起的能量供应操纵对底物利用和表现的影响","authors":"Ella S Smith, Megan Kuikman, Jonathon Weakley, Nicolin Tee, Rachel McCormick, Kathryn E Ackerman, Kirsty J Elliott-Sale, Trent Stellingwerff, Rachel Harris, Alannah K A McKay, Louise M Burke","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to examine sex-based differences in substrate oxidation, postprandial metabolism, and performance in response to 24-h manipulations in energy availability (EA), induced by manipulations to energy intake or exercise energy expenditure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a Latin Square design, 20 endurance athletes (10 females using monophasic oral contraceptives and 10 males) undertook five trials, each comprising three consecutive days. Day 1 was a standardized period of high EA; EA was then manipulated on day 2; postintervention testing occurred on day 3. Day 2 EA was low/high/higher EA (LEA/HEA/GEA) at 15/45/75 kcal·kg -1 FFM·d -1 , with conditions of LEA and HEA separately achieved by manipulations of either energy intake or exercise energy expenditure (LEA REST/EX vs HEA REST/EX ). On day 3, fasted peak fat oxidation during cycling and 2-h postprandial (high carbohydrate and energy meal) metabolism were assessed, alongside several performance tests: Wingate, countermovement jump, squat jump, isometric mid-thigh pull, and the Stroop color and word test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Highest peak fat oxidation occurred under LEA induced by exercise ( P < 0.01), with no difference between sexes. Postprandial glucose ( P < 0.01) and insulin ( P < 0.05) responses were highest across both sexes when LEA was induced by diet. Relative peak and mean power throughout the Wingate, alongside countermovement jump height did not differ between EA conditions ( P > 0.05), whereas squat jump height was lower during GEA than both LEA REST ( P = 0.045) and HEA EX ( P = 0.016). Isometric mid-thigh pull peak force and the Stroop effect did not change with altered EA ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute (24-h) exercise-induced LEA influenced fasted substrate oxidation more than diet-induced LEA, whereas 24 h of LEA did not impair strength/power, sprint capacity, or cognitive performance. Finally, the responses to EA manipulations did not differ between sexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"820-831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of 24-h Diet- or Exercise-Induced Energy Availability Manipulations on Substrate Utilization and Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Ella S Smith, Megan Kuikman, Jonathon Weakley, Nicolin Tee, Rachel McCormick, Kathryn E Ackerman, Kirsty J Elliott-Sale, Trent Stellingwerff, Rachel Harris, Alannah K A McKay, Louise M Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to examine sex-based differences in substrate oxidation, postprandial metabolism, and performance in response to 24-h manipulations in energy availability (EA), induced by manipulations to energy intake or exercise energy expenditure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a Latin Square design, 20 endurance athletes (10 females using monophasic oral contraceptives and 10 males) undertook five trials, each comprising three consecutive days. Day 1 was a standardized period of high EA; EA was then manipulated on day 2; postintervention testing occurred on day 3. Day 2 EA was low/high/higher EA (LEA/HEA/GEA) at 15/45/75 kcal·kg -1 FFM·d -1 , with conditions of LEA and HEA separately achieved by manipulations of either energy intake or exercise energy expenditure (LEA REST/EX vs HEA REST/EX ). On day 3, fasted peak fat oxidation during cycling and 2-h postprandial (high carbohydrate and energy meal) metabolism were assessed, alongside several performance tests: Wingate, countermovement jump, squat jump, isometric mid-thigh pull, and the Stroop color and word test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Highest peak fat oxidation occurred under LEA induced by exercise ( P < 0.01), with no difference between sexes. Postprandial glucose ( P < 0.01) and insulin ( P < 0.05) responses were highest across both sexes when LEA was induced by diet. Relative peak and mean power throughout the Wingate, alongside countermovement jump height did not differ between EA conditions ( P > 0.05), whereas squat jump height was lower during GEA than both LEA REST ( P = 0.045) and HEA EX ( P = 0.016). Isometric mid-thigh pull peak force and the Stroop effect did not change with altered EA ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute (24-h) exercise-induced LEA influenced fasted substrate oxidation more than diet-induced LEA, whereas 24 h of LEA did not impair strength/power, sprint capacity, or cognitive performance. Finally, the responses to EA manipulations did not differ between sexes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"820-831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003608\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究由能量摄入(EI)或运动能量消耗(EEE)引起的24小时能量可用性(EA)操纵引起的底物氧化、餐后代谢和性能的性别差异。方法:采用拉丁广场设计,20名耐力运动员(10名女性使用单相口服避孕药,10名男性)进行5次试验,每次试验连续3天。第一天是标准化的高EA时期;然后在第二天操纵EA;干预后测试在第三天进行。第2天的EA为低/高/高EA (LEA/HEA/GEA),分别为15/45/75 kcal·kg-1FFM·Day -1, LEA和HEA的条件分别通过EI或EEE (LEA REST/EX vs. HEAREST/EX)实现。在第三天,评估空腹循环期间的峰值脂肪氧化和餐后两小时(高碳水化合物和能量餐)代谢,以及几项性能测试:温盖特、反动作跳跃(CMJ)、深蹲跳跃(SJ)、等长大腿中拉(IMTP)和Stroop颜色和单词测试。结果:运动诱发LEA组脂肪氧化峰值最高(p < 0.01),性别差异无统计学意义。饲粮诱导LEA时,两性对餐后血糖(p < 0.01)和胰岛素(p < 0.05)的反应最高。整个Wingate的相对峰值和平均功率以及CMJ高度在EA条件下没有差异(p > 0.05),而GEA期间SJ高度低于LEAREST (p = 0.045)和HEAEX (p = 0.016)。IMTP峰值力和Stroop效应不随EA的改变而改变(p < 0.05)。结论:与饮食诱导的LEA相比,急性(24小时)运动诱导的LEA对空腹底物氧化的影响更大,而24小时的LEA不会损害力量/力量、冲刺能力或认知表现。最后,对EA操作的反应在性别之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of 24-h Diet- or Exercise-Induced Energy Availability Manipulations on Substrate Utilization and Performance.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to examine sex-based differences in substrate oxidation, postprandial metabolism, and performance in response to 24-h manipulations in energy availability (EA), induced by manipulations to energy intake or exercise energy expenditure.

Methods: In a Latin Square design, 20 endurance athletes (10 females using monophasic oral contraceptives and 10 males) undertook five trials, each comprising three consecutive days. Day 1 was a standardized period of high EA; EA was then manipulated on day 2; postintervention testing occurred on day 3. Day 2 EA was low/high/higher EA (LEA/HEA/GEA) at 15/45/75 kcal·kg -1 FFM·d -1 , with conditions of LEA and HEA separately achieved by manipulations of either energy intake or exercise energy expenditure (LEA REST/EX vs HEA REST/EX ). On day 3, fasted peak fat oxidation during cycling and 2-h postprandial (high carbohydrate and energy meal) metabolism were assessed, alongside several performance tests: Wingate, countermovement jump, squat jump, isometric mid-thigh pull, and the Stroop color and word test.

Results: Highest peak fat oxidation occurred under LEA induced by exercise ( P < 0.01), with no difference between sexes. Postprandial glucose ( P < 0.01) and insulin ( P < 0.05) responses were highest across both sexes when LEA was induced by diet. Relative peak and mean power throughout the Wingate, alongside countermovement jump height did not differ between EA conditions ( P > 0.05), whereas squat jump height was lower during GEA than both LEA REST ( P = 0.045) and HEA EX ( P = 0.016). Isometric mid-thigh pull peak force and the Stroop effect did not change with altered EA ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Acute (24-h) exercise-induced LEA influenced fasted substrate oxidation more than diet-induced LEA, whereas 24 h of LEA did not impair strength/power, sprint capacity, or cognitive performance. Finally, the responses to EA manipulations did not differ between sexes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信