重症监护脑电图监测的依从性和疗效:一项前瞻性多中心研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Flavio Bellante, Susana Ferrao Santos, Ludovic Gérard, Luc-Marie Jacquet, Michaël Piagnerelli, Fabio Taccone, Aurélie Thooft, Xavier Wittebole, Benjamin Legros, Nicolas Gaspard
{"title":"重症监护脑电图监测的依从性和疗效:一项前瞻性多中心研究。","authors":"Flavio Bellante, Susana Ferrao Santos, Ludovic Gérard, Luc-Marie Jacquet, Michaël Piagnerelli, Fabio Taccone, Aurélie Thooft, Xavier Wittebole, Benjamin Legros, Nicolas Gaspard","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has provided a set of recommendations on the use of critical care EEG monitoring (CEEG). However, these recommendations have not been prospectively validated. We aimed to assess the adherence to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations for obtaining CEEG for different indications and the yield of obtained CEEG according to these different indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter prospective observational study of critically ill adult patients between April 01, 2022, and June 22, 2022, in two academic medical centers and a large teaching hospital. Indications for CEEG, according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations, were determined based on clinical data at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit. The use of CEEG and detection of electrographic seizures were retrieved from the EEG databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 600 patients were enrolled in this study. The primary admission diagnoses were medical (49%), surgical (30%), or neurologic/neurosurgical (21%). Approximately 60% of patients had an altered mental status. A few (6%) patients had a preceding clinical seizure, and 1% had generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Indications were identified in 226 admissions. Of these patients, 88 (39%) underwent CEEG. In addition, 12 patients underwent CEEG without clear indications. Of the 100 patients, 33 (33%) had electrographic seizures. Adherence to recommendations and yields was highest for refractory status epilepticus, altered mental status after any clinical seizure, and acute brain injury. Adherence and yield varied the most and were inversely correlated in the group of patients without acute brain injury, suggesting that additional clinical factors may have contributed to patient selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients meeting American Clinical Neurophysiology Society indications and receiving CEEG had a high seizure risk. Emerging CEEG programs should focus on epilepsy-related and neurologic diagnosis. Although recommendations effectively identify groups of patients with a high seizure risk, additional clinical factors might further help select candidates in the low-risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to Recommendations and Yield of Critical Care EEG Monitoring: A Prospective Multicentric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Flavio Bellante, Susana Ferrao Santos, Ludovic Gérard, Luc-Marie Jacquet, Michaël Piagnerelli, Fabio Taccone, Aurélie Thooft, Xavier Wittebole, Benjamin Legros, Nicolas Gaspard\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has provided a set of recommendations on the use of critical care EEG monitoring (CEEG). However, these recommendations have not been prospectively validated. We aimed to assess the adherence to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations for obtaining CEEG for different indications and the yield of obtained CEEG according to these different indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter prospective observational study of critically ill adult patients between April 01, 2022, and June 22, 2022, in two academic medical centers and a large teaching hospital. Indications for CEEG, according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations, were determined based on clinical data at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit. The use of CEEG and detection of electrographic seizures were retrieved from the EEG databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 600 patients were enrolled in this study. The primary admission diagnoses were medical (49%), surgical (30%), or neurologic/neurosurgical (21%). Approximately 60% of patients had an altered mental status. A few (6%) patients had a preceding clinical seizure, and 1% had generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Indications were identified in 226 admissions. Of these patients, 88 (39%) underwent CEEG. In addition, 12 patients underwent CEEG without clear indications. Of the 100 patients, 33 (33%) had electrographic seizures. Adherence to recommendations and yields was highest for refractory status epilepticus, altered mental status after any clinical seizure, and acute brain injury. Adherence and yield varied the most and were inversely correlated in the group of patients without acute brain injury, suggesting that additional clinical factors may have contributed to patient selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients meeting American Clinical Neurophysiology Society indications and receiving CEEG had a high seizure risk. Emerging CEEG programs should focus on epilepsy-related and neurologic diagnosis. Although recommendations effectively identify groups of patients with a high seizure risk, additional clinical factors might further help select candidates in the low-risk group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001143\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国临床神经生理学会(American Clinical Neurophysiology Society)提供了一套关于使用重症监护脑电图监测(CEEG)的建议。然而,这些建议尚未经过前瞻性验证。我们的目的是评估在不同适应症下获取 CEEG 时对美国临床神经生理学会建议的遵守情况,以及根据这些不同适应症获取 CEEG 的收益率:这是一项多中心前瞻性观察研究,对象是2022年4月1日至2022年6月22日期间在两所学术医疗中心和一所大型教学医院就诊的成年重症患者。根据美国临床神经生理学会(American Clinical Neurophysiology Society)的建议,CEEG 的适应症是根据重症监护室出院时的临床数据确定的。从脑电图数据库中检索了 CEEG 的使用情况和电图癫痫发作的检测情况:共有 600 名患者参与了这项研究。主要入院诊断为内科(49%)、外科(30%)或神经/神经外科(21%)。约 60% 的患者有精神状态改变。少数患者(6%)曾有临床癫痫发作,1%的患者有全身抽搐性癫痫状态。在 226 名入院患者中确定了适应症。其中 88 名患者(39%)接受了 CEEG 检查。此外,12 名患者在没有明确适应症的情况下接受了 CEEG 检查。在 100 名患者中,33 人(33%)出现电图癫痫发作。难治性癫痫状态、任何临床发作后的精神状态改变和急性脑损伤患者对建议的依从性和有效率最高。在无急性脑损伤的患者组中,依从性和收益率的差异最大,且呈反比关系,这表明在选择患者时可能还存在其他临床因素:结论:符合美国临床神经生理学会适应症并接受 CEEG 检查的患者具有较高的癫痫发作风险。新兴的 CEEG 项目应关注癫痫相关和神经系统诊断。虽然建议有效地确定了癫痫发作风险较高的患者群体,但其他临床因素可能会进一步帮助选择低风险群体中的候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adherence to Recommendations and Yield of Critical Care EEG Monitoring: A Prospective Multicentric Study.

Purpose: The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has provided a set of recommendations on the use of critical care EEG monitoring (CEEG). However, these recommendations have not been prospectively validated. We aimed to assess the adherence to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations for obtaining CEEG for different indications and the yield of obtained CEEG according to these different indications.

Methods: This was a multicenter prospective observational study of critically ill adult patients between April 01, 2022, and June 22, 2022, in two academic medical centers and a large teaching hospital. Indications for CEEG, according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations, were determined based on clinical data at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit. The use of CEEG and detection of electrographic seizures were retrieved from the EEG databases.

Results: A total of 600 patients were enrolled in this study. The primary admission diagnoses were medical (49%), surgical (30%), or neurologic/neurosurgical (21%). Approximately 60% of patients had an altered mental status. A few (6%) patients had a preceding clinical seizure, and 1% had generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Indications were identified in 226 admissions. Of these patients, 88 (39%) underwent CEEG. In addition, 12 patients underwent CEEG without clear indications. Of the 100 patients, 33 (33%) had electrographic seizures. Adherence to recommendations and yields was highest for refractory status epilepticus, altered mental status after any clinical seizure, and acute brain injury. Adherence and yield varied the most and were inversely correlated in the group of patients without acute brain injury, suggesting that additional clinical factors may have contributed to patient selection.

Conclusions: Patients meeting American Clinical Neurophysiology Society indications and receiving CEEG had a high seizure risk. Emerging CEEG programs should focus on epilepsy-related and neurologic diagnosis. Although recommendations effectively identify groups of patients with a high seizure risk, additional clinical factors might further help select candidates in the low-risk group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信