Hamzeh Almashni, Era Kakar, Paolo Nava, Hom-Lay Wang, Muhammad H A Saleh
{"title":"类风湿关节炎对种植体周围疾病的影响:纵向回顾性临床和影像学评价。","authors":"Hamzeh Almashni, Era Kakar, Paolo Nava, Hom-Lay Wang, Muhammad H A Saleh","doi":"10.1002/JPER.24-0376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on the incidence of peri-implantitis (PI) and peri-implant mucositis (PIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiographic and clinical chart reviews were conducted to measure the probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss (MBL) around the implants to diagnose peri-implant diseases based on the 2017 workshop classification. Values were recorded at the baseline (T0) to the last available chart and radiograph (T1). Maintenance compliance was evaluated. Cases were followed longitudinally to detect the incidence of PI and PIM. Various potential confounders were controlled, including the total radiographic follow-up time, chart-based follow-up time, number of maintenance visits, implant dimensions, history of periodontitis, bone graft, restoration angle, emergence, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests evaluated categorical and continuous differences. Generalized estimating equations with a Tweedie distribution were applied. Binary logistic regression ascertained the odds ratio for binary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients (50 RA and 51 non-RA) with 124 implants were investigated. The mean follow-up period for the implants was 5.38 ± 2.22 years. Implant survival rate was high at 96%. The RA group demonstrated a significantly higher PI (p = 0.024), while the non-RA group showed a significantly higher PIM (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between both groups in implant survival and MBL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the non-RA group, RA patients demonstrated a similar incidence of MBL and implant survival rates and a significantly lower incidence of PIM; however, there was a significantly higher incidence of PI.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In this study, we investigated the condition of dental implants in 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to 51 healthy controls over 5 years. Assessments from initial treatment to the last follow-up visit included reviewing patient records and radiographs for signs of bleeding, probing depth, and bone loss. These measures helped diagnose peri-implantitis (PI) and peri-implant mucositis (PIM) based on the 2017 periodontal disease classification. The findings revealed a high implant survival rate in both groups (96%) with no significant difference in bone loss. However, the RA group showed a significantly higher incidence of PI than the healthy group that demonstrated PIM.</p>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of rheumatoid arthritis on peri-implant diseases: A longitudinal retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Hamzeh Almashni, Era Kakar, Paolo Nava, Hom-Lay Wang, Muhammad H A Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/JPER.24-0376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on the incidence of peri-implantitis (PI) and peri-implant mucositis (PIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiographic and clinical chart reviews were conducted to measure the probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss (MBL) around the implants to diagnose peri-implant diseases based on the 2017 workshop classification. Values were recorded at the baseline (T0) to the last available chart and radiograph (T1). Maintenance compliance was evaluated. Cases were followed longitudinally to detect the incidence of PI and PIM. Various potential confounders were controlled, including the total radiographic follow-up time, chart-based follow-up time, number of maintenance visits, implant dimensions, history of periodontitis, bone graft, restoration angle, emergence, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests evaluated categorical and continuous differences. Generalized estimating equations with a Tweedie distribution were applied. Binary logistic regression ascertained the odds ratio for binary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients (50 RA and 51 non-RA) with 124 implants were investigated. The mean follow-up period for the implants was 5.38 ± 2.22 years. Implant survival rate was high at 96%. The RA group demonstrated a significantly higher PI (p = 0.024), while the non-RA group showed a significantly higher PIM (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between both groups in implant survival and MBL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the non-RA group, RA patients demonstrated a similar incidence of MBL and implant survival rates and a significantly lower incidence of PIM; however, there was a significantly higher incidence of PI.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In this study, we investigated the condition of dental implants in 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to 51 healthy controls over 5 years. Assessments from initial treatment to the last follow-up visit included reviewing patient records and radiographs for signs of bleeding, probing depth, and bone loss. These measures helped diagnose peri-implantitis (PI) and peri-implant mucositis (PIM) based on the 2017 periodontal disease classification. The findings revealed a high implant survival rate in both groups (96%) with no significant difference in bone loss. However, the RA group showed a significantly higher incidence of PI than the healthy group that demonstrated PIM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.24-0376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.24-0376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:研究类风湿关节炎(RA)对种植体周围炎(PI)和种植体周围粘膜炎(PIM)发病率的影响:目的:研究类风湿性关节炎(RA)对种植体周围炎(PI)和种植体周围粘膜炎(PIM)发病率的影响:根据2017年研讨会的分类,对种植体周围的探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血量和边缘骨量(MBL)进行测量,以诊断种植体周围疾病。从基线值(T0)到最后一次可用的病历和X光片(T1)均有记录。对维护依从性进行评估。对病例进行纵向随访,以检测 PI 和 PIM 的发生率。对各种潜在的混杂因素进行了控制,包括总的影像学随访时间、基于图表的随访时间、维护次数、种植体尺寸、牙周炎病史、植骨、修复角度、出牙期、吸烟和糖尿病。卡方检验(Chi-square)和曼惠特尼检验(Mann-Whitney)对分类和连续性差异进行了评估。应用了特威迪分布的广义估计方程。二元逻辑回归确定了二元结果的几率比例:共调查了 101 名患者(50 名 RA 患者和 51 名非 RA 患者)的 124 例植入物。种植体的平均随访时间为 5.38 ± 2.22 年。种植体存活率高达 96%。RA 组的 PI 明显更高(P = 0.024),而非 RA 组的 PIM 明显更高(P = 0.024):与非 RA 组相比,RA 患者的 MBL 发生率和种植体存活率相似,PIM 发生率明显较低;但 PI 发生率明显较高。白话摘要:在这项研究中,我们调查了 50 名类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者与 51 名健康对照组患者 5 年来的牙科种植体状况。从初始治疗到最后一次随访的评估包括查看患者记录和X光片,以了解出血迹象、探查深度和骨质流失情况。根据2017年牙周病分类,这些措施有助于诊断种植体周围炎(PI)和种植体周围粘膜炎(PIM)。研究结果显示,两组患者的种植体存活率都很高(96%),骨质流失方面没有明显差异。不过,RA 组的 PI 发生率明显高于显示出 PIM 的健康组。
Influence of rheumatoid arthritis on peri-implant diseases: A longitudinal retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Background: To investigate the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on the incidence of peri-implantitis (PI) and peri-implant mucositis (PIM).
Methods: Radiographic and clinical chart reviews were conducted to measure the probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss (MBL) around the implants to diagnose peri-implant diseases based on the 2017 workshop classification. Values were recorded at the baseline (T0) to the last available chart and radiograph (T1). Maintenance compliance was evaluated. Cases were followed longitudinally to detect the incidence of PI and PIM. Various potential confounders were controlled, including the total radiographic follow-up time, chart-based follow-up time, number of maintenance visits, implant dimensions, history of periodontitis, bone graft, restoration angle, emergence, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests evaluated categorical and continuous differences. Generalized estimating equations with a Tweedie distribution were applied. Binary logistic regression ascertained the odds ratio for binary outcomes.
Results: A total of 101 patients (50 RA and 51 non-RA) with 124 implants were investigated. The mean follow-up period for the implants was 5.38 ± 2.22 years. Implant survival rate was high at 96%. The RA group demonstrated a significantly higher PI (p = 0.024), while the non-RA group showed a significantly higher PIM (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between both groups in implant survival and MBL.
Conclusion: Compared to the non-RA group, RA patients demonstrated a similar incidence of MBL and implant survival rates and a significantly lower incidence of PIM; however, there was a significantly higher incidence of PI.
Plain language summary: In this study, we investigated the condition of dental implants in 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to 51 healthy controls over 5 years. Assessments from initial treatment to the last follow-up visit included reviewing patient records and radiographs for signs of bleeding, probing depth, and bone loss. These measures helped diagnose peri-implantitis (PI) and peri-implant mucositis (PIM) based on the 2017 periodontal disease classification. The findings revealed a high implant survival rate in both groups (96%) with no significant difference in bone loss. However, the RA group showed a significantly higher incidence of PI than the healthy group that demonstrated PIM.