自制与工业制造:不同食品的营养成分和潜在有害化合物的含量。

IF 6.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Current Research in Food Science Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100958
Beatrice Pellegrini, Lin Xin Strootman, Christos Fryganas, Daniela Martini, Vincenzo Fogliano
{"title":"自制与工业制造:不同食品的营养成分和潜在有害化合物的含量。","authors":"Beatrice Pellegrini, Lin Xin Strootman, Christos Fryganas, Daniela Martini, Vincenzo Fogliano","doi":"10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many consumers perceive industrially processed foods as lower in quality and potentially harmful to health, with concerns about poor nutrition, additives, and harmful compounds formed during processing. Epidemiological studies have highlighted risks associated with \"ultra-processed foods,\" but empirical comparisons between industrial (IND) and home-made (HM) foods are scarce. This study aimed to compare nutritional values and harmful compounds in IND vs. HM versions of four common foods: plumcake, fish sticks, tomato sauce, and cereal bars. The HM foods were prepared using similar recipes to their industrial counterparts, avoiding technologies and ingredients not available at home. The analysis revealed identical nutritional compositions between the IND and HM versions. Acrylamide (AA) and Maillard reaction (MR) products, considered potentially harmful, showed comparable levels across the food pairs, though HM versions showed slightly higher levels in some cases. AA was undetectable in IND plumcake and HM cereal bars, while HM fish sticks had higher AA content than the industrial version. These findings indicate that homemade foods do not necessarily offer superior nutritional quality or lower levels of harmful compounds compared to industrial products. The classification of food products quality based on processing or industrial ingredients alone is not a reliable indicator of their healthiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10939,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Food Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"100958"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-made vs industry-made: Nutrient composition and content of potentially harmful compounds of different food products.\",\"authors\":\"Beatrice Pellegrini, Lin Xin Strootman, Christos Fryganas, Daniela Martini, Vincenzo Fogliano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many consumers perceive industrially processed foods as lower in quality and potentially harmful to health, with concerns about poor nutrition, additives, and harmful compounds formed during processing. Epidemiological studies have highlighted risks associated with \\\"ultra-processed foods,\\\" but empirical comparisons between industrial (IND) and home-made (HM) foods are scarce. This study aimed to compare nutritional values and harmful compounds in IND vs. HM versions of four common foods: plumcake, fish sticks, tomato sauce, and cereal bars. The HM foods were prepared using similar recipes to their industrial counterparts, avoiding technologies and ingredients not available at home. The analysis revealed identical nutritional compositions between the IND and HM versions. Acrylamide (AA) and Maillard reaction (MR) products, considered potentially harmful, showed comparable levels across the food pairs, though HM versions showed slightly higher levels in some cases. AA was undetectable in IND plumcake and HM cereal bars, while HM fish sticks had higher AA content than the industrial version. These findings indicate that homemade foods do not necessarily offer superior nutritional quality or lower levels of harmful compounds compared to industrial products. The classification of food products quality based on processing or industrial ingredients alone is not a reliable indicator of their healthiness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Food Science\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"100958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730957/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100958\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多消费者认为工业加工食品质量较低,可能对健康有害,他们担心加工过程中营养不良、添加剂和有害化合物的形成。流行病学研究强调了与“超加工食品”相关的风险,但工业食品(IND)和自制食品(HM)之间的实证比较很少。这项研究旨在比较四种常见食物的营养价值和有害化合物:葡萄干饼、鱼条、番茄酱和谷物棒。HM食品是用与工业食品相似的食谱制作的,避免了国内没有的技术和成分。分析结果显示,IND和HM版本之间的营养成分相同。被认为有潜在危害的丙烯酰胺(AA)和美拉德反应(MR)产品在两种食品中含量相当,但HM版本在某些情况下含量略高。在IND葡萄干饼和HM谷物棒中未检测到AA,而HM鱼棒的AA含量高于工业版。这些发现表明,与工业产品相比,自制食品不一定具有更高的营养质量或更低的有害化合物含量。仅根据加工或工业成分对食品质量进行分类并不是衡量其健康状况的可靠指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home-made vs industry-made: Nutrient composition and content of potentially harmful compounds of different food products.

Many consumers perceive industrially processed foods as lower in quality and potentially harmful to health, with concerns about poor nutrition, additives, and harmful compounds formed during processing. Epidemiological studies have highlighted risks associated with "ultra-processed foods," but empirical comparisons between industrial (IND) and home-made (HM) foods are scarce. This study aimed to compare nutritional values and harmful compounds in IND vs. HM versions of four common foods: plumcake, fish sticks, tomato sauce, and cereal bars. The HM foods were prepared using similar recipes to their industrial counterparts, avoiding technologies and ingredients not available at home. The analysis revealed identical nutritional compositions between the IND and HM versions. Acrylamide (AA) and Maillard reaction (MR) products, considered potentially harmful, showed comparable levels across the food pairs, though HM versions showed slightly higher levels in some cases. AA was undetectable in IND plumcake and HM cereal bars, while HM fish sticks had higher AA content than the industrial version. These findings indicate that homemade foods do not necessarily offer superior nutritional quality or lower levels of harmful compounds compared to industrial products. The classification of food products quality based on processing or industrial ingredients alone is not a reliable indicator of their healthiness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Food Science
Current Research in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
232
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Current Research in Food Science is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the breadth of knowledge in the field of food science. It serves as a platform for publishing original research articles and short communications that encompass a wide array of topics, including food chemistry, physics, microbiology, nutrition, nutraceuticals, process and package engineering, materials science, food sustainability, and food security. By covering these diverse areas, the journal aims to provide a comprehensive source of the latest scientific findings and technological advancements that are shaping the future of the food industry. The journal's scope is designed to address the multidisciplinary nature of food science, reflecting its commitment to promoting innovation and ensuring the safety and quality of the food supply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信