Dana Loudovici-Krug, Louise André, Heiner Paul Blumensaat, Marion Granger, Laetitia Stefani, Josephine Kühnemund, Christina Lemhöfer, Claire Falandry
{"title":"复杂内科手术干预前老年癌症患者的身体康复:综述","authors":"Dana Loudovici-Krug, Louise André, Heiner Paul Blumensaat, Marion Granger, Laetitia Stefani, Josephine Kühnemund, Christina Lemhöfer, Claire Falandry","doi":"10.14336/AD.2024.0957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prehabilitation has become a field of increasing interest over recent decades. However, few studies specifically investigated prehabilitation for older patients with cancer. The objective of this umbrella review was to summarize evidence on prehabilitation programs to identify the physical interventions that may be applied with benefit to older cancer patients who will undergo complex medical-surgical procedures. The protocol was registered in Prospero. Major databases, namely PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Prospero, were searched until summer 2020 and a second search was performed until November 2023. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, dealing with the major topic of prehabilitation for older patients with cancer diagnosis. Among 1425 records (633 until 2020, 792 until November 2023), 14 reviews were selected for inclusion. According to the AMSTAR-2 checklist, the median quality score was 11 (range: 5-12). Total duration of prehabilitation ranged from 1 to 5 weeks, session duration from 20 to 50 minutes, session frequency from 3 to 6 per week. Reported program modes were aerobic and resistance exercises. Concerning the outcome measures, the functional as well as the respiratory status was significantly affected. Quality of life did not benefit significantly, but showed a positive trend. The length of hospital stay was not significantly improved in the majority of the studies. In contrast, most systematic reviews reported significantly lower numbers of total postoperative complications. Functional recovery was enhanced in half of the found reviews. Prehabilitation is a growing field, notably also in reviews focussing on oncological care for elderly patients included in this umbrella review. Aerobic and resistance exercises are the core of the majority of the programs evaluated but their characteristics (total duration, frequency) are partly heterogeneous. Prehabilitation for older patients may also include other modalities of geriatric interventions like nutritional or psychological optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7434,"journal":{"name":"Aging and Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Prehabilitation for Older Patients with Cancer before Complex Medical-Surgical Interventions: An Umbrella Review.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Loudovici-Krug, Louise André, Heiner Paul Blumensaat, Marion Granger, Laetitia Stefani, Josephine Kühnemund, Christina Lemhöfer, Claire Falandry\",\"doi\":\"10.14336/AD.2024.0957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prehabilitation has become a field of increasing interest over recent decades. However, few studies specifically investigated prehabilitation for older patients with cancer. The objective of this umbrella review was to summarize evidence on prehabilitation programs to identify the physical interventions that may be applied with benefit to older cancer patients who will undergo complex medical-surgical procedures. The protocol was registered in Prospero. Major databases, namely PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Prospero, were searched until summer 2020 and a second search was performed until November 2023. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, dealing with the major topic of prehabilitation for older patients with cancer diagnosis. Among 1425 records (633 until 2020, 792 until November 2023), 14 reviews were selected for inclusion. According to the AMSTAR-2 checklist, the median quality score was 11 (range: 5-12). Total duration of prehabilitation ranged from 1 to 5 weeks, session duration from 20 to 50 minutes, session frequency from 3 to 6 per week. Reported program modes were aerobic and resistance exercises. Concerning the outcome measures, the functional as well as the respiratory status was significantly affected. Quality of life did not benefit significantly, but showed a positive trend. The length of hospital stay was not significantly improved in the majority of the studies. In contrast, most systematic reviews reported significantly lower numbers of total postoperative complications. Functional recovery was enhanced in half of the found reviews. Prehabilitation is a growing field, notably also in reviews focussing on oncological care for elderly patients included in this umbrella review. Aerobic and resistance exercises are the core of the majority of the programs evaluated but their characteristics (total duration, frequency) are partly heterogeneous. Prehabilitation for older patients may also include other modalities of geriatric interventions like nutritional or psychological optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging and Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2024.0957\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2024.0957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近几十年来,康复已经成为一个越来越受关注的领域。然而,很少有研究专门调查老年癌症患者的康复。本综述的目的是总结有关康复计划的证据,以确定物理干预可能对将接受复杂内科手术的老年癌症患者有益。协议是在普洛斯彼罗注册的。主要数据库,即PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science和Prospero被检索到2020年夏季,第二次检索到2023年11月。所有的系统综述和荟萃分析都包括在内,涉及癌症诊断的老年患者的康复这一主要主题。在1425个记录中(截止2020年633个,截止2023年11月792个),有14个评价入选。根据AMSTAR-2检查表,质量得分中位数为11分(范围:5-12)。预适应总持续时间为1至5周,每次持续时间为20至50分钟,每次频率为每周3至6次。报告的项目模式为有氧运动和阻力运动。在结局指标方面,功能和呼吸状态受到显著影响。生活质量没有明显的改善,但呈现出积极的趋势。在大多数研究中,住院时间没有显著改善。相比之下,大多数系统评价报告的术后并发症总数明显较低。在发现的评论中,有一半的功能恢复得到了增强。康复是一个不断发展的领域,特别是在本综述中关于老年患者肿瘤护理的综述中。有氧运动和阻力运动是大多数评估项目的核心,但它们的特征(总持续时间、频率)在一定程度上是不同的。老年患者的康复也可能包括其他形式的老年干预,如营养或心理优化。
Physical Prehabilitation for Older Patients with Cancer before Complex Medical-Surgical Interventions: An Umbrella Review.
Prehabilitation has become a field of increasing interest over recent decades. However, few studies specifically investigated prehabilitation for older patients with cancer. The objective of this umbrella review was to summarize evidence on prehabilitation programs to identify the physical interventions that may be applied with benefit to older cancer patients who will undergo complex medical-surgical procedures. The protocol was registered in Prospero. Major databases, namely PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Prospero, were searched until summer 2020 and a second search was performed until November 2023. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, dealing with the major topic of prehabilitation for older patients with cancer diagnosis. Among 1425 records (633 until 2020, 792 until November 2023), 14 reviews were selected for inclusion. According to the AMSTAR-2 checklist, the median quality score was 11 (range: 5-12). Total duration of prehabilitation ranged from 1 to 5 weeks, session duration from 20 to 50 minutes, session frequency from 3 to 6 per week. Reported program modes were aerobic and resistance exercises. Concerning the outcome measures, the functional as well as the respiratory status was significantly affected. Quality of life did not benefit significantly, but showed a positive trend. The length of hospital stay was not significantly improved in the majority of the studies. In contrast, most systematic reviews reported significantly lower numbers of total postoperative complications. Functional recovery was enhanced in half of the found reviews. Prehabilitation is a growing field, notably also in reviews focussing on oncological care for elderly patients included in this umbrella review. Aerobic and resistance exercises are the core of the majority of the programs evaluated but their characteristics (total duration, frequency) are partly heterogeneous. Prehabilitation for older patients may also include other modalities of geriatric interventions like nutritional or psychological optimization.
期刊介绍:
Aging & Disease (A&D) is an open-access online journal dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research on the biology of aging, the pathophysiology of age-related diseases, and innovative therapies for conditions affecting the elderly. The scope encompasses various diseases such as Stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson’s disease, Epilepsy, Dementia, Depression, Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, Arthritis, Cataract, Osteoporosis, Diabetes, and Hypertension. The journal welcomes studies involving animal models as well as human tissues or cells.