北方森林恢复力对森林损益的不对称敏感性

IF 13.9 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Xiaoye Liu, Dashan Wang, Anping Chen, Zhenzhong Zeng
{"title":"北方森林恢复力对森林损益的不对称敏感性","authors":"Xiaoye Liu, Dashan Wang, Anping Chen, Zhenzhong Zeng","doi":"10.1038/s41559-024-02631-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest gains and losses may have unequal effects on forest resilience, particularly given their distinct temporal dynamics. Here, we quantify the sensitivities of boreal forest resilience to forest cover gain and loss using a resilience indicator derived from the temporal autocorrelation (TAC) of the kernel normalized difference vegetation index from 2000 to 2020. Our findings unveil pronounced asymmetric sensitivities, with stronger sensitivity to forest loss (−4.26 ± 0.14 × 10<sup>−3</sup>; TAC increase per 1% forest cover loss) than to forest gain (−1.65 ± 0.12 × 10<sup>−3</sup>; TAC decrease per 1% forest cover gain). Locally, ~73% of the boreal forest exhibits negative sensitivity, indicating enhanced resilience with forest cover gain and vice versa, especially in intact forests compared to managed ones. This sensitivity is affected by various trajectories in forest cover change, stemming primarily from temporal asynchrony in the recovery rates of various ecosystem functions. The observed asymmetry underscores the importance of prioritizing forest conservation over reactive management strategies following losses, ultimately contributing to more sustainable forest management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":18835,"journal":{"name":"Nature ecology & evolution","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetric sensitivity of boreal forest resilience to forest gain and loss\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoye Liu, Dashan Wang, Anping Chen, Zhenzhong Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41559-024-02631-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Forest gains and losses may have unequal effects on forest resilience, particularly given their distinct temporal dynamics. Here, we quantify the sensitivities of boreal forest resilience to forest cover gain and loss using a resilience indicator derived from the temporal autocorrelation (TAC) of the kernel normalized difference vegetation index from 2000 to 2020. Our findings unveil pronounced asymmetric sensitivities, with stronger sensitivity to forest loss (−4.26 ± 0.14 × 10<sup>−3</sup>; TAC increase per 1% forest cover loss) than to forest gain (−1.65 ± 0.12 × 10<sup>−3</sup>; TAC decrease per 1% forest cover gain). Locally, ~73% of the boreal forest exhibits negative sensitivity, indicating enhanced resilience with forest cover gain and vice versa, especially in intact forests compared to managed ones. This sensitivity is affected by various trajectories in forest cover change, stemming primarily from temporal asynchrony in the recovery rates of various ecosystem functions. The observed asymmetry underscores the importance of prioritizing forest conservation over reactive management strategies following losses, ultimately contributing to more sustainable forest management practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature ecology & evolution\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature ecology & evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02631-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature ecology & evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02631-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林的收益和损失可能对森林恢复力产生不平等的影响,特别是考虑到它们不同的时间动态。本文利用2000 - 2020年核归一化植被指数的时间自相关(TAC)得出的恢复力指标,量化了北方森林恢复力对森林覆盖增减的敏感性。我们的研究结果揭示了明显的不对称敏感性,对森林损失的敏感性更强(- 4.26±0.14 × 10−3;每1%森林覆盖损失的TAC增幅大于森林收益(- 1.65±0.12 × 10 - 3;每增加1%森林覆盖面积,TAC就会减少)。在局部,约73%的北方针叶林表现出负敏感性,表明恢复力随着森林覆盖的增加而增强,反之亦然,特别是在完整的森林中,与管理的森林相比。这种敏感性受到森林覆盖变化的各种轨迹的影响,主要源于各种生态系统功能恢复速度的时间非同步性。观察到的不对称强调了在损失后优先考虑森林保护而不是被动管理战略的重要性,最终有助于更可持续的森林管理做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Asymmetric sensitivity of boreal forest resilience to forest gain and loss

Asymmetric sensitivity of boreal forest resilience to forest gain and loss

Forest gains and losses may have unequal effects on forest resilience, particularly given their distinct temporal dynamics. Here, we quantify the sensitivities of boreal forest resilience to forest cover gain and loss using a resilience indicator derived from the temporal autocorrelation (TAC) of the kernel normalized difference vegetation index from 2000 to 2020. Our findings unveil pronounced asymmetric sensitivities, with stronger sensitivity to forest loss (−4.26 ± 0.14 × 10−3; TAC increase per 1% forest cover loss) than to forest gain (−1.65 ± 0.12 × 10−3; TAC decrease per 1% forest cover gain). Locally, ~73% of the boreal forest exhibits negative sensitivity, indicating enhanced resilience with forest cover gain and vice versa, especially in intact forests compared to managed ones. This sensitivity is affected by various trajectories in forest cover change, stemming primarily from temporal asynchrony in the recovery rates of various ecosystem functions. The observed asymmetry underscores the importance of prioritizing forest conservation over reactive management strategies following losses, ultimately contributing to more sustainable forest management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature ecology & evolution
Nature ecology & evolution Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
22.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Nature Ecology & Evolution is interested in the full spectrum of ecological and evolutionary biology, encompassing approaches at the molecular, organismal, population, community and ecosystem levels, as well as relevant parts of the social sciences. Nature Ecology & Evolution provides a place where all researchers and policymakers interested in all aspects of life's diversity can come together to learn about the most accomplished and significant advances in the field and to discuss topical issues. An online-only monthly journal, our broad scope ensures that the research published reaches the widest possible audience of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信