Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert Reinauer
{"title":"接受阿伐伐他汀Pegol疗法治疗地理萎缩时出现黄斑新生血管的受试者的一年疗效。","authors":"Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert Reinauer","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S498985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the 12-month outcomes in subjects developing macular neovascularization (MNV) during intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was conducted as a case-controlled, retrospective study of AMD subjects undergoing IVA treatment for GA from two private practice institutions. Subjects were divided into 1) a Study Group of patients who developed MNV and then underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy during the study period, and 2) a Control Group of patients who were complication-free during the study period. Both cohorts had a baseline Snellen visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a baseline GA total area of ≥ 1 mm<sup>2</sup>and ≤ 17.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 12 months of follow-up after initiation of IVA for GA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 56 patients analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline features between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.22 logMAR (-0.27 to -0.17) versus -0.06 logMAR (-0.12 to 0.00); p=<0.0001], and greater GA total lesion growth [1.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (1.53-2.03) versus 0.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (0.54-1.02); p=<0.0001] during the 12-month study period compared to the Control Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients developing MNV while undergoing IVA treatment for GA secondary to AMD have worse clinical outcomes despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy compared to patients who were complication-free at 12-months. This highlights the seriousness of MNV in this patient population and may help specialists counsel patients when considering treatment for GA secondary to AMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Year Outcomes in Subjects Developing Macular Neovascularization While Undergoing Avacincaptad Pegol Therapy for Geographic Atrophy.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert Reinauer\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S498985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the 12-month outcomes in subjects developing macular neovascularization (MNV) during intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was conducted as a case-controlled, retrospective study of AMD subjects undergoing IVA treatment for GA from two private practice institutions. Subjects were divided into 1) a Study Group of patients who developed MNV and then underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy during the study period, and 2) a Control Group of patients who were complication-free during the study period. Both cohorts had a baseline Snellen visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a baseline GA total area of ≥ 1 mm<sup>2</sup>and ≤ 17.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 12 months of follow-up after initiation of IVA for GA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 56 patients analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline features between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.22 logMAR (-0.27 to -0.17) versus -0.06 logMAR (-0.12 to 0.00); p=<0.0001], and greater GA total lesion growth [1.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (1.53-2.03) versus 0.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (0.54-1.02); p=<0.0001] during the 12-month study period compared to the Control Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients developing MNV while undergoing IVA treatment for GA secondary to AMD have worse clinical outcomes despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy compared to patients who were complication-free at 12-months. This highlights the seriousness of MNV in this patient population and may help specialists counsel patients when considering treatment for GA secondary to AMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"111-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727320/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S498985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S498985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)继发地理性萎缩(GA)患者在玻璃体静脉注射avacincaptad pegol (IVA)治疗期间发生黄斑新生血管(MNV)的12个月结果。方法:本研究是一项病例对照的回顾性研究,来自两家私人执业机构的AMD患者因GA接受IVA治疗。研究对象分为两组:1)研究组为研究期间发生MNV并接受抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗的患者;2)对照组为研究期间无并发症的患者。两个队列的基线Snellen视力≥20/200,基线GA总面积≥1 mm2和≤17.5 mm2, GA IVA开始后随访12个月。结果:共分析56例患者。各组间基线特征无显著差异。研究组的视力下降幅度更大[-0.22 logMAR(-0.27至-0.17)相比-0.06 logMAR(-0.12至0.00);P =2 (1.53-2.03) vs 0.78 mm2 (0.54-1.02);p=结论:与12个月无并发症的患者相比,尽管接受了抗vegf治疗,但在接受IVA治疗时发生MNV的患者的临床结果更差。这突出了MNV在这一患者群体中的严重性,可能有助于专家在考虑治疗继发于AMD的GA时为患者提供建议。
One-Year Outcomes in Subjects Developing Macular Neovascularization While Undergoing Avacincaptad Pegol Therapy for Geographic Atrophy.
Purpose: To assess the 12-month outcomes in subjects developing macular neovascularization (MNV) during intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Methods: This research was conducted as a case-controlled, retrospective study of AMD subjects undergoing IVA treatment for GA from two private practice institutions. Subjects were divided into 1) a Study Group of patients who developed MNV and then underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy during the study period, and 2) a Control Group of patients who were complication-free during the study period. Both cohorts had a baseline Snellen visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a baseline GA total area of ≥ 1 mm2and ≤ 17.5 mm2, and 12 months of follow-up after initiation of IVA for GA.
Results: There were 56 patients analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline features between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.22 logMAR (-0.27 to -0.17) versus -0.06 logMAR (-0.12 to 0.00); p=<0.0001], and greater GA total lesion growth [1.78 mm2 (1.53-2.03) versus 0.78 mm2 (0.54-1.02); p=<0.0001] during the 12-month study period compared to the Control Group.
Conclusion: Patients developing MNV while undergoing IVA treatment for GA secondary to AMD have worse clinical outcomes despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy compared to patients who were complication-free at 12-months. This highlights the seriousness of MNV in this patient population and may help specialists counsel patients when considering treatment for GA secondary to AMD.