多发性硬化症自动病灶分割软件的横断面验证:与放射科医生评估的比较。

Maria Vittoria Spampinato, Heather R Collins, Hannah Wells, William Dennis, Jordan H Chamberlin, Emily Ye, Justin A Chetta, Maria Gisele Matheus, Seth T Stalcup, Donna R Roberts
{"title":"多发性硬化症自动病灶分割软件的横断面验证:与放射科医生评估的比较。","authors":"Maria Vittoria Spampinato, Heather R Collins, Hannah Wells, William Dennis, Jordan H Chamberlin, Emily Ye, Justin A Chetta, Maria Gisele Matheus, Seth T Stalcup, Donna R Roberts","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>MRI is widely used to assess disease burden in MS. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available k-nearest neighbors (kNN) network software in quantifying white matter lesion (WML) burden in MS. We compared the software's WML quantification to expert radiologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed brain MRI examinations of adult patients with MS and of adult patients without MS and with a normal brain MRI referred from the neurology clinic. MR images were processed by using an AI-powered, cloud-based kNN software, which generated a DICOM lesion distribution map and a report of WML count and volume in 4 brain regions (periventricular, deep, juxtacortical, and infratentorial white matter). Two blinded radiologists performed semiquantitative assessments of WM lesion load and lesion segmentation accuracy. Additionally, 4 blinded neuroradiologists independently reviewed the data to determine if MRI findings supported an MS diagnosis. The associations between radiologist-rated WML load and kNN model WML volume and count were evaluated with Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (rho) because these variables were not normally distributed. Results were considered significant when <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 32 patients with MS (35.4 years ±9.1) and 19 patients without MS (33.5 years ±12.1). The kNN software demonstrated 94.1% and 84.3% accuracy in differentiating MS from non-MS subjects based respectively on WML count and WML volume, compared with radiologists' accuracy of 90.2% to 94.1%. Lesion segmentation was more accurate for the deep WM and infratentorial regions than for the juxtacortical region (both <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>kNN-derived WML volume and WML count provide valuable quantitative metrics of disease burden in MS. AI-powered postprocessing software may enhance the interpretation of brain MRIs in MS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1510-1516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Sectional Validation of an Automated Lesion Segmentation Software in Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Radiologist Assessments.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Vittoria Spampinato, Heather R Collins, Hannah Wells, William Dennis, Jordan H Chamberlin, Emily Ye, Justin A Chetta, Maria Gisele Matheus, Seth T Stalcup, Donna R Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>MRI is widely used to assess disease burden in MS. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available k-nearest neighbors (kNN) network software in quantifying white matter lesion (WML) burden in MS. We compared the software's WML quantification to expert radiologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed brain MRI examinations of adult patients with MS and of adult patients without MS and with a normal brain MRI referred from the neurology clinic. MR images were processed by using an AI-powered, cloud-based kNN software, which generated a DICOM lesion distribution map and a report of WML count and volume in 4 brain regions (periventricular, deep, juxtacortical, and infratentorial white matter). Two blinded radiologists performed semiquantitative assessments of WM lesion load and lesion segmentation accuracy. Additionally, 4 blinded neuroradiologists independently reviewed the data to determine if MRI findings supported an MS diagnosis. The associations between radiologist-rated WML load and kNN model WML volume and count were evaluated with Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (rho) because these variables were not normally distributed. Results were considered significant when <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 32 patients with MS (35.4 years ±9.1) and 19 patients without MS (33.5 years ±12.1). The kNN software demonstrated 94.1% and 84.3% accuracy in differentiating MS from non-MS subjects based respectively on WML count and WML volume, compared with radiologists' accuracy of 90.2% to 94.1%. Lesion segmentation was more accurate for the deep WM and infratentorial regions than for the juxtacortical region (both <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>kNN-derived WML volume and WML count provide valuable quantitative metrics of disease burden in MS. AI-powered postprocessing software may enhance the interpretation of brain MRIs in MS patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1510-1516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:磁共振成像被广泛用于评估多发性硬化症(MS)的疾病负担。本研究旨在评估市售k-近邻(k-NN)软件量化ms白质病变(WML)负担的有效性。我们将该软件的WML量化与放射科专家的评估进行了比较。材料和方法:我们回顾性地回顾了从神经病学诊所转来的成年MS患者、非MS和正常脑MRI的成年患者的脑MRI检查。MRI图像使用基于人工智能的基于云的k-NN软件进行处理,生成DICOM病变分布图和四个脑区域(脑室周围、深部、皮质旁和幕下白质)的WML计数和体积报告。两名盲法放射科医生对WM病变负荷和病变分割准确性进行了半定量评估。此外,四名盲法神经放射学家独立审查了数据,以确定MRI结果是否支持MS诊断。当p < 0.05时认为结果显著。结果:纳入MS患者32例(35.4年±9.1岁),非MS患者19例(33.5年±12.1岁)。基于WML计数和WML体积,k-NN软件区分MS和非MS受试者的准确率分别为94.1%和84.3%,而放射科医生的准确率为90.2%和94.1%。结论:k- nn衍生的WML体积和WML计数为MS患者的疾病负担提供了有价值的定量指标。ai支持的后处理软件可以增强对MS患者脑部mri的解释。事例=再邻居;WML=白质病变;磁化制备快速采集梯度回波;空间=使用不同翻转角度进化的应用优化对比的采样完美;扩展残疾状态量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Sectional Validation of an Automated Lesion Segmentation Software in Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Radiologist Assessments.

Background and purpose: MRI is widely used to assess disease burden in MS. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available k-nearest neighbors (kNN) network software in quantifying white matter lesion (WML) burden in MS. We compared the software's WML quantification to expert radiologists' assessments.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed brain MRI examinations of adult patients with MS and of adult patients without MS and with a normal brain MRI referred from the neurology clinic. MR images were processed by using an AI-powered, cloud-based kNN software, which generated a DICOM lesion distribution map and a report of WML count and volume in 4 brain regions (periventricular, deep, juxtacortical, and infratentorial white matter). Two blinded radiologists performed semiquantitative assessments of WM lesion load and lesion segmentation accuracy. Additionally, 4 blinded neuroradiologists independently reviewed the data to determine if MRI findings supported an MS diagnosis. The associations between radiologist-rated WML load and kNN model WML volume and count were evaluated with Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (rho) because these variables were not normally distributed. Results were considered significant when P < .05.

Results: The study included 32 patients with MS (35.4 years ±9.1) and 19 patients without MS (33.5 years ±12.1). The kNN software demonstrated 94.1% and 84.3% accuracy in differentiating MS from non-MS subjects based respectively on WML count and WML volume, compared with radiologists' accuracy of 90.2% to 94.1%. Lesion segmentation was more accurate for the deep WM and infratentorial regions than for the juxtacortical region (both P < .001).

Conclusions: kNN-derived WML volume and WML count provide valuable quantitative metrics of disease burden in MS. AI-powered postprocessing software may enhance the interpretation of brain MRIs in MS patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信