安大略省多伦多市新型社区城市流动卫生诊所的实施和评价。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Meghan O'Neill, Robert J Redelmeier, Camilla Michalski, Raymond Macaraeg, Maureen Gans, Alice Schoffel, Lori M Diemert, Luwam Ogbaselassie, Laura C Rosella, Andrew Boozary
{"title":"安大略省多伦多市新型社区城市流动卫生诊所的实施和评价。","authors":"Meghan O'Neill, Robert J Redelmeier, Camilla Michalski, Raymond Macaraeg, Maureen Gans, Alice Schoffel, Lori M Diemert, Luwam Ogbaselassie, Laura C Rosella, Andrew Boozary","doi":"10.17269/s41997-024-00962-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Setting: </strong>Despite Canada's single-payer health system, marginalized populations often experience poor health outcomes and barriers to healthcare access. In response, mobile health clinics (MHCs) have been deployed in several cities across Canada. MHCs are well established in the United States; however, little is known about their role and impact in a country with universal healthcare. We describe the implementation of an urban MHC and early learnings from a mixed methods process and outcome-oriented evaluation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In February 2021, Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre, TELUS Health for Good, and University Health Network's Gattuso Centre for Social Medicine partnered to launch a nurse practitioner‒led, community-based MHC in Toronto, Ontario. The MHC provides low-barrier primary healthcare, harm reduction, and mental health services at five convenient locations.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Through an intercept survey (n = 49) and semi-structured interviews (n = 10), we sought to understand the sociodemographic characteristics of clients, their experiences at the MHC, and barriers and facilitators to the MHC in comparison to traditional healthcare settings. Most clients surveyed reported being homeless (61%). Without the MHC, 37% of clients would have accessed care at an emergency department and 18% would not have sought care. Thematic analysis revealed two structural and two relational factors that improved care experiences and care access.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>We demonstrate that in a single-payer health system, MHCs alleviate major barriers to care access for marginalized populations. Learnings provide context to the most salient factors influencing clients' decisions to seek care at MHCs and can inform how these outreach models are designed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and evaluation of a novel community-based urban mobile health clinic in Toronto, Ontario.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan O'Neill, Robert J Redelmeier, Camilla Michalski, Raymond Macaraeg, Maureen Gans, Alice Schoffel, Lori M Diemert, Luwam Ogbaselassie, Laura C Rosella, Andrew Boozary\",\"doi\":\"10.17269/s41997-024-00962-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Setting: </strong>Despite Canada's single-payer health system, marginalized populations often experience poor health outcomes and barriers to healthcare access. In response, mobile health clinics (MHCs) have been deployed in several cities across Canada. MHCs are well established in the United States; however, little is known about their role and impact in a country with universal healthcare. We describe the implementation of an urban MHC and early learnings from a mixed methods process and outcome-oriented evaluation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In February 2021, Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre, TELUS Health for Good, and University Health Network's Gattuso Centre for Social Medicine partnered to launch a nurse practitioner‒led, community-based MHC in Toronto, Ontario. The MHC provides low-barrier primary healthcare, harm reduction, and mental health services at five convenient locations.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Through an intercept survey (n = 49) and semi-structured interviews (n = 10), we sought to understand the sociodemographic characteristics of clients, their experiences at the MHC, and barriers and facilitators to the MHC in comparison to traditional healthcare settings. Most clients surveyed reported being homeless (61%). Without the MHC, 37% of clients would have accessed care at an emergency department and 18% would not have sought care. Thematic analysis revealed two structural and two relational factors that improved care experiences and care access.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>We demonstrate that in a single-payer health system, MHCs alleviate major barriers to care access for marginalized populations. Learnings provide context to the most salient factors influencing clients' decisions to seek care at MHCs and can inform how these outreach models are designed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-024-00962-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-024-00962-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境:尽管加拿大实行单一付款人医疗体系,但边缘化人群的健康状况往往不佳,在获得医疗服务方面存在障碍。为此,在加拿大的几个城市部署了流动保健诊所。mhc在美国已经很成熟;然而,人们对它们在一个拥有全民医疗保健的国家中的作用和影响知之甚少。我们描述了城市MHC的实施,以及从混合方法、过程和结果导向评估中获得的早期经验。干预措施:2021年2月,Parkdale Queen West社区卫生中心、TELUS Health for Good和大学健康网络的Gattuso社会医学中心合作,在安大略省多伦多市推出了一个以护士为主导、以社区为基础的MHC。卫生保健中心在五个便利的地点提供低障碍初级卫生保健、减少伤害和精神卫生服务。结果:通过拦截调查(n = 49)和半结构化访谈(n = 10),我们试图了解客户的社会人口学特征,他们在MHC的经历,以及与传统医疗机构相比,MHC的障碍和促进因素。大多数被调查的客户(61%)报告说自己无家可归。如果没有MHC, 37%的患者会在急诊室接受治疗,18%的患者不会寻求治疗。专题分析揭示了改善护理体验和护理可及性的两个结构性因素和两个相关因素。含义:我们证明,在单一付款人卫生系统中,mhc减轻了边缘化人群获得医疗服务的主要障碍。学习为影响客户决定在mhc寻求护理的最突出因素提供了背景,并可以告知如何设计这些外展模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and evaluation of a novel community-based urban mobile health clinic in Toronto, Ontario.

Setting: Despite Canada's single-payer health system, marginalized populations often experience poor health outcomes and barriers to healthcare access. In response, mobile health clinics (MHCs) have been deployed in several cities across Canada. MHCs are well established in the United States; however, little is known about their role and impact in a country with universal healthcare. We describe the implementation of an urban MHC and early learnings from a mixed methods process and outcome-oriented evaluation.

Intervention: In February 2021, Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre, TELUS Health for Good, and University Health Network's Gattuso Centre for Social Medicine partnered to launch a nurse practitioner‒led, community-based MHC in Toronto, Ontario. The MHC provides low-barrier primary healthcare, harm reduction, and mental health services at five convenient locations.

Outcomes: Through an intercept survey (n = 49) and semi-structured interviews (n = 10), we sought to understand the sociodemographic characteristics of clients, their experiences at the MHC, and barriers and facilitators to the MHC in comparison to traditional healthcare settings. Most clients surveyed reported being homeless (61%). Without the MHC, 37% of clients would have accessed care at an emergency department and 18% would not have sought care. Thematic analysis revealed two structural and two relational factors that improved care experiences and care access.

Implications: We demonstrate that in a single-payer health system, MHCs alleviate major barriers to care access for marginalized populations. Learnings provide context to the most salient factors influencing clients' decisions to seek care at MHCs and can inform how these outreach models are designed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities. CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health. CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.   Énoncé de mission La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé. La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations. La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信