通过电子病历探索住院和急诊患者心力衰竭的死亡率和预后因素:一种机器学习方法。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S488159
Cheng-Sheng Yu, Jenny L Wu, Chun-Ming Shih, Kuan-Lin Chiu, Yu-Da Chen, Tzu-Hao Chang
{"title":"通过电子病历探索住院和急诊患者心力衰竭的死亡率和预后因素:一种机器学习方法。","authors":"Cheng-Sheng Yu, Jenny L Wu, Chun-Ming Shih, Kuan-Lin Chiu, Yu-Da Chen, Tzu-Hao Chang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S488159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As HF progresses into advanced HF, patients experience a poor quality of life, distressing symptoms, intensive care use, social distress, and eventual hospital death. We aimed to investigate the relationship between morality and potential prognostic factors among in-patient and emergency patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A case series study: Data are collected from in-hospital and emergency care patients from 2014 to 2021, including their international classification of disease at admission, and laboratory data such as blood count, liver and renal functions, lipid profile, and other biochemistry from the hospital's electrical medical records. After a series of data pre-processing in the electronic medical record system, several machine learning models were used to evaluate predictions of HF mortality. The outcomes of those potential risk factors were visualized by different statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3871 hF patients were enrolled. Logistic regression showed that intensive care unit (ICU) history within 1 week (OR: 9.765, 95% CI: 6.65, 14.34; p-value < 0.001) and prothrombin time (OR: 1.193, 95% CI: 1.098, 1.296; <0.001) were associated with mortality. Similar results were obtained when we analyzed the data using Cox regression instead of logistic regression. Random forest, support vector machine (SVM), Adaboost, and logistic regression had better overall performances with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of >0.87. Naïve Bayes was the best in terms of both specificity and precision. With ensemble learning, age, ICU history within 1 week, and respiratory rate (BF) were the top three compelling risk factors affecting mortality due to HF. To improve the explainability of the AI models, Shapley Additive Explanations methods were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exploring HF mortality and its patterns related to clinical risk factors by machine learning models can help physicians make appropriate decisions when monitoring HF patients' health quality in the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"77-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Mortality and Prognostic Factors of Heart Failure with In-Hospital and Emergency Patients by Electronic Medical Records: A Machine Learning Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Sheng Yu, Jenny L Wu, Chun-Ming Shih, Kuan-Lin Chiu, Yu-Da Chen, Tzu-Hao Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S488159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As HF progresses into advanced HF, patients experience a poor quality of life, distressing symptoms, intensive care use, social distress, and eventual hospital death. We aimed to investigate the relationship between morality and potential prognostic factors among in-patient and emergency patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A case series study: Data are collected from in-hospital and emergency care patients from 2014 to 2021, including their international classification of disease at admission, and laboratory data such as blood count, liver and renal functions, lipid profile, and other biochemistry from the hospital's electrical medical records. After a series of data pre-processing in the electronic medical record system, several machine learning models were used to evaluate predictions of HF mortality. The outcomes of those potential risk factors were visualized by different statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3871 hF patients were enrolled. Logistic regression showed that intensive care unit (ICU) history within 1 week (OR: 9.765, 95% CI: 6.65, 14.34; p-value < 0.001) and prothrombin time (OR: 1.193, 95% CI: 1.098, 1.296; <0.001) were associated with mortality. Similar results were obtained when we analyzed the data using Cox regression instead of logistic regression. Random forest, support vector machine (SVM), Adaboost, and logistic regression had better overall performances with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of >0.87. Naïve Bayes was the best in terms of both specificity and precision. With ensemble learning, age, ICU history within 1 week, and respiratory rate (BF) were the top three compelling risk factors affecting mortality due to HF. To improve the explainability of the AI models, Shapley Additive Explanations methods were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exploring HF mortality and its patterns related to clinical risk factors by machine learning models can help physicians make appropriate decisions when monitoring HF patients' health quality in the hospital.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"77-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727332/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S488159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S488159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着高血压发展为晚期高血压,患者的生活质量会下降,出现令人痛苦的症状,需要接受重症监护,承受社会压力,并最终在医院死亡。我们旨在调查高血压住院病人和急诊病人的道德与潜在预后因素之间的关系:病例系列研究:收集2014年至2021年住院和急诊患者的数据,包括入院时的国际疾病分类,以及医院电子病历中的血细胞计数、肝肾功能、血脂谱和其他生化指标等实验室数据。在电子病历系统中进行一系列数据预处理后,几个机器学习模型被用来评估对高血压死亡率的预测。这些潜在风险因素的结果通过不同的统计分析得以直观呈现:共有 3871 名高频患者入选。逻辑回归结果显示,1周内有重症监护室(ICU)病史(OR:9.765,95% CI:6.65,14.34;P值<0.001)和凝血酶原时间(OR:1.193,95% CI:1.098,1.296;0.87,P值<0.001)是最佳预测因素。Naïve Bayes 在特异性和精确性方面都是最好的。通过集合学习,年龄、1 周内的 ICU 病史和呼吸频率 (BF) 是影响心房颤动死亡率的前三位重要风险因素。为了提高人工智能模型的可解释性,还采用了夏普利加法解释方法:结论:通过机器学习模型探索心房颤动死亡率及其与临床风险因素相关的模式,有助于医生在医院监测心房颤动患者的健康质量时做出适当的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Mortality and Prognostic Factors of Heart Failure with In-Hospital and Emergency Patients by Electronic Medical Records: A Machine Learning Approach.

Purpose: As HF progresses into advanced HF, patients experience a poor quality of life, distressing symptoms, intensive care use, social distress, and eventual hospital death. We aimed to investigate the relationship between morality and potential prognostic factors among in-patient and emergency patients with HF.

Patients and methods: A case series study: Data are collected from in-hospital and emergency care patients from 2014 to 2021, including their international classification of disease at admission, and laboratory data such as blood count, liver and renal functions, lipid profile, and other biochemistry from the hospital's electrical medical records. After a series of data pre-processing in the electronic medical record system, several machine learning models were used to evaluate predictions of HF mortality. The outcomes of those potential risk factors were visualized by different statistical analyses.

Results: In total, 3871 hF patients were enrolled. Logistic regression showed that intensive care unit (ICU) history within 1 week (OR: 9.765, 95% CI: 6.65, 14.34; p-value < 0.001) and prothrombin time (OR: 1.193, 95% CI: 1.098, 1.296; <0.001) were associated with mortality. Similar results were obtained when we analyzed the data using Cox regression instead of logistic regression. Random forest, support vector machine (SVM), Adaboost, and logistic regression had better overall performances with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of >0.87. Naïve Bayes was the best in terms of both specificity and precision. With ensemble learning, age, ICU history within 1 week, and respiratory rate (BF) were the top three compelling risk factors affecting mortality due to HF. To improve the explainability of the AI models, Shapley Additive Explanations methods were also conducted.

Conclusion: Exploring HF mortality and its patterns related to clinical risk factors by machine learning models can help physicians make appropriate decisions when monitoring HF patients' health quality in the hospital.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信