F Cardinali, S Carzaniga, L Martini, M T Loiudice, Fabrizio Carinci
{"title":"持续监测以人为本的医院护理的框架:参与式服务改进核对表的验证。","authors":"F Cardinali, S Carzaniga, L Martini, M T Loiudice, Fabrizio Carinci","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, a nationwide survey carried out in 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions, allowed defining an extended checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items for continuous use across the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Factor analysis was used to validate the construct of the checklist. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues > 1 was used to optimize factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation > 0.30 and factor loadings > 0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient > 0.70 were submitted to expert opinion for final decision. Overall internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 out of 243 items in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. A subgroup of 67 items was retained in 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \"Person-oriented organizational and care processes\", 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \"Physical accessibility, liveability and comfort of the facilities\", 15 items in 3 sub-areas of \"Access to information, streamlining and transparency\", and 20 items in 4 sub-areas of \"Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens\". Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77 and 0.90, showing high consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated a \"core\" checklist that can be routinely used to monitor the implementation of person-centred care in Italian hospitals. The tool can be applied more widely by multiple stakeholders as a measurement instrument for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for the continuous monitoring of person-centred hospital care: validation of a checklist for participatory service improvement.\",\"authors\":\"F Cardinali, S Carzaniga, L Martini, M T Loiudice, Fabrizio Carinci\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, a nationwide survey carried out in 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions, allowed defining an extended checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items for continuous use across the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Factor analysis was used to validate the construct of the checklist. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues > 1 was used to optimize factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation > 0.30 and factor loadings > 0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient > 0.70 were submitted to expert opinion for final decision. Overall internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 out of 243 items in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. A subgroup of 67 items was retained in 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \\\"Person-oriented organizational and care processes\\\", 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \\\"Physical accessibility, liveability and comfort of the facilities\\\", 15 items in 3 sub-areas of \\\"Access to information, streamlining and transparency\\\", and 20 items in 4 sub-areas of \\\"Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens\\\". Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77 and 0.90, showing high consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated a \\\"core\\\" checklist that can be routinely used to monitor the implementation of person-centred care in Italian hospitals. The tool can be applied more widely by multiple stakeholders as a measurement instrument for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A framework for the continuous monitoring of person-centred hospital care: validation of a checklist for participatory service improvement.
Background: In 2018, a nationwide survey carried out in 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions, allowed defining an extended checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items for continuous use across the country.
Methods: Factor analysis was used to validate the construct of the checklist. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues > 1 was used to optimize factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation > 0.30 and factor loadings > 0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient > 0.70 were submitted to expert opinion for final decision. Overall internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.
Results: A total of 183 out of 243 items in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. A subgroup of 67 items was retained in 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas of "Person-oriented organizational and care processes", 16 items in 4 sub-areas of "Physical accessibility, liveability and comfort of the facilities", 15 items in 3 sub-areas of "Access to information, streamlining and transparency", and 20 items in 4 sub-areas of "Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens". Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77 and 0.90, showing high consistency.
Conclusions: This study validated a "core" checklist that can be routinely used to monitor the implementation of person-centred care in Italian hospitals. The tool can be applied more widely by multiple stakeholders as a measurement instrument for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness.
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.