持续监测以人为本的医院护理的框架:参与式服务改进核对表的验证。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
F Cardinali, S Carzaniga, L Martini, M T Loiudice, Fabrizio Carinci
{"title":"持续监测以人为本的医院护理的框架:参与式服务改进核对表的验证。","authors":"F Cardinali, S Carzaniga, L Martini, M T Loiudice, Fabrizio Carinci","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, a nationwide survey carried out in 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions, allowed defining an extended checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items for continuous use across the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Factor analysis was used to validate the construct of the checklist. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues > 1 was used to optimize factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation > 0.30 and factor loadings > 0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient > 0.70 were submitted to expert opinion for final decision. Overall internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 out of 243 items in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. A subgroup of 67 items was retained in 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \"Person-oriented organizational and care processes\", 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \"Physical accessibility, liveability and comfort of the facilities\", 15 items in 3 sub-areas of \"Access to information, streamlining and transparency\", and 20 items in 4 sub-areas of \"Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens\". Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77 and 0.90, showing high consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated a \"core\" checklist that can be routinely used to monitor the implementation of person-centred care in Italian hospitals. The tool can be applied more widely by multiple stakeholders as a measurement instrument for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for the continuous monitoring of person-centred hospital care: validation of a checklist for participatory service improvement.\",\"authors\":\"F Cardinali, S Carzaniga, L Martini, M T Loiudice, Fabrizio Carinci\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, a nationwide survey carried out in 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions, allowed defining an extended checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items for continuous use across the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Factor analysis was used to validate the construct of the checklist. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues > 1 was used to optimize factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation > 0.30 and factor loadings > 0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient > 0.70 were submitted to expert opinion for final decision. Overall internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 out of 243 items in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. A subgroup of 67 items was retained in 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \\\"Person-oriented organizational and care processes\\\", 16 items in 4 sub-areas of \\\"Physical accessibility, liveability and comfort of the facilities\\\", 15 items in 3 sub-areas of \\\"Access to information, streamlining and transparency\\\", and 20 items in 4 sub-areas of \\\"Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens\\\". Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77 and 0.90, showing high consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated a \\\"core\\\" checklist that can be routinely used to monitor the implementation of person-centred care in Italian hospitals. The tool can be applied more widely by multiple stakeholders as a measurement instrument for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01410-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2018年,在意大利21个地区中的16个地区的387家急症护理医院进行了一项全国性调查,允许定义一份扩展清单,用于参与性评估医院护理中的以人为本。我们的目标是验证一套减少的核心项目,以便在全国范围内持续使用。方法:采用因子分析法对量表的编制进行验证。采用特征值> 1的变大旋转对因子结构进行优化。项目-总相关> .30和因子负荷> .4归因于个体因素。项目间相关系数> 0.70的项目提交专家意见进行最终决策。整体内部一致性通过Cronbach’s alpha进行评估。结果:原检查表的243个项目中,共有183个项目被提交因子分析。在4个主要领域保留了67个项目,分配如下:“以人为本的组织和护理过程”4个子领域16个项目,“设施的物理可达性、宜居性和舒适性”4个子领域16个项目,“获取信息、精简和透明度”3个子领域15个项目,以及“照顾与患者和公民的关系”4个子领域20个项目。Cronbach’s alpha的总体值在0.77 ~ 0.90之间,一致性较高。结论:本研究验证了一个“核心”检查表,该检查表可常规用于监测意大利医院以人为本护理的实施情况。该工具可以被多个利益相关者更广泛地应用,作为参与性评估以人为本的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A framework for the continuous monitoring of person-centred hospital care: validation of a checklist for participatory service improvement.

Background: In 2018, a nationwide survey carried out in 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions, allowed defining an extended checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items for continuous use across the country.

Methods: Factor analysis was used to validate the construct of the checklist. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues > 1 was used to optimize factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation > 0.30 and factor loadings > 0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient > 0.70 were submitted to expert opinion for final decision. Overall internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.

Results: A total of 183 out of 243 items in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. A subgroup of 67 items was retained in 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas of "Person-oriented organizational and care processes", 16 items in 4 sub-areas of "Physical accessibility, liveability and comfort of the facilities", 15 items in 3 sub-areas of "Access to information, streamlining and transparency", and 20 items in 4 sub-areas of "Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens". Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77 and 0.90, showing high consistency.

Conclusions: This study validated a "core" checklist that can be routinely used to monitor the implementation of person-centred care in Italian hospitals. The tool can be applied more widely by multiple stakeholders as a measurement instrument for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信