I型双相情感障碍和双相情感谱系患者及其未受影响的一级亲属的神经系统软症状:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Seyed Saeed Sadr, Seyed Mehdi Samimi-Ardestani, Yousef Semnani, Narges Adel, Faezeh Tajari, Nastaran Samani
{"title":"I型双相情感障碍和双相情感谱系患者及其未受影响的一级亲属的神经系统软症状:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Seyed Saeed Sadr,&nbsp;Seyed Mehdi Samimi-Ardestani,&nbsp;Yousef Semnani,&nbsp;Narges Adel,&nbsp;Faezeh Tajari,&nbsp;Nastaran Samani","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to compare neurological soft signs (NSSs) in type 1 bipolar disorder (BD), bipolar spectrum (BS) patients, and their unaffected first-degree relatives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This descriptive cross-sectional study involved participants referred to the Psychiatric Department of Imam Hossein Hospital. Five groups (<i>n</i> = 25): patients with type 1 BD, patients with BS, unaffected first-degree relatives of the two groups, and a control group were evaluated using the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis revealed that patients with bipolar I disorder had the highest NES scores, with significant group differences (<i>F</i>(4.120) = 10.36, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The Bonferroni correction identified bipolar I patients as the primary source of this difference, while other groups did not significantly differ. ANCOVA showed that age (<i>F</i>(1.123) = 3.92, <i>p</i> = 0.052) and gender (<i>F</i>(1.123) = 0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.75) had no significant influence on NES scores. However, all four NES subsets significantly contributed to the overall score, except for the sensory subset. Differences were significant between bipolar I patients and most other groups, except the BS group, which showed no significant differences from the rest. No correlation was found with age, gender, or age of disease onset.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The higher NSS severity in type I BD compared to BS and control groups highlights its potential link to the genetic and neurodevelopmental differences in BD type I. Further research is recommended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurological Soft Signs in Type I Bipolar Disorder and Bipolar Spectrum Patients and Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Saeed Sadr,&nbsp;Seyed Mehdi Samimi-Ardestani,&nbsp;Yousef Semnani,&nbsp;Narges Adel,&nbsp;Faezeh Tajari,&nbsp;Nastaran Samani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to compare neurological soft signs (NSSs) in type 1 bipolar disorder (BD), bipolar spectrum (BS) patients, and their unaffected first-degree relatives.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This descriptive cross-sectional study involved participants referred to the Psychiatric Department of Imam Hossein Hospital. Five groups (<i>n</i> = 25): patients with type 1 BD, patients with BS, unaffected first-degree relatives of the two groups, and a control group were evaluated using the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The analysis revealed that patients with bipolar I disorder had the highest NES scores, with significant group differences (<i>F</i>(4.120) = 10.36, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The Bonferroni correction identified bipolar I patients as the primary source of this difference, while other groups did not significantly differ. ANCOVA showed that age (<i>F</i>(1.123) = 3.92, <i>p</i> = 0.052) and gender (<i>F</i>(1.123) = 0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.75) had no significant influence on NES scores. However, all four NES subsets significantly contributed to the overall score, except for the sensory subset. Differences were significant between bipolar I patients and most other groups, except the BS group, which showed no significant differences from the rest. No correlation was found with age, gender, or age of disease onset.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The higher NSS severity in type I BD compared to BS and control groups highlights its potential link to the genetic and neurodevelopmental differences in BD type I. Further research is recommended.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725529/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究旨在比较1型双相情感障碍(BD)、双相情感谱系(BS)患者及其未受影响的一级亲属的神经系统软体征(nss)。方法:这项描述性横断面研究涉及到伊玛目侯赛因医院精神科的参与者。采用神经学评估量表(NES)对1型BD患者、BS患者、两组未受影响的一级亲属和对照组进行评估,共5组(n = 25)。结果:分析显示双相I型障碍患者的NES评分最高,组间差异有统计学意义(F(4.120) = 10.36, p (1.123) = 3.92, p = 0.052),性别(F(1.123) = 0.1, p = 0.75)对NES评分无显著影响。然而,除了感觉子集外,所有四个NES子集都对总分有显著贡献。双相I型患者与大多数其他组之间存在显著差异,但BS组与其他组无显著差异。未发现与年龄、性别或发病年龄相关。结论:与BS组和对照组相比,I型BD患者NSS严重程度较高,这表明其可能与I型BD的遗传和神经发育差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurological Soft Signs in Type I Bipolar Disorder and Bipolar Spectrum Patients and Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background and Aims

This study aimed to compare neurological soft signs (NSSs) in type 1 bipolar disorder (BD), bipolar spectrum (BS) patients, and their unaffected first-degree relatives.

Methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study involved participants referred to the Psychiatric Department of Imam Hossein Hospital. Five groups (n = 25): patients with type 1 BD, patients with BS, unaffected first-degree relatives of the two groups, and a control group were evaluated using the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES).

Results

The analysis revealed that patients with bipolar I disorder had the highest NES scores, with significant group differences (F(4.120) = 10.36, p < 0.001). The Bonferroni correction identified bipolar I patients as the primary source of this difference, while other groups did not significantly differ. ANCOVA showed that age (F(1.123) = 3.92, p = 0.052) and gender (F(1.123) = 0.1, p = 0.75) had no significant influence on NES scores. However, all four NES subsets significantly contributed to the overall score, except for the sensory subset. Differences were significant between bipolar I patients and most other groups, except the BS group, which showed no significant differences from the rest. No correlation was found with age, gender, or age of disease onset.

Conclusion

The higher NSS severity in type I BD compared to BS and control groups highlights its potential link to the genetic and neurodevelopmental differences in BD type I. Further research is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信