用于土壤施肥的污水污泥和消化液中的肠杆菌。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Angelina Wójcik-Fatla, Ewelina Farian, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Jacek Sroka, Piotr Skowron, Grzegorz Siebielec, Jolanta Małgorzata Zdybel, Tamara Jadczyszyn, Tomasz Cencek
{"title":"用于土壤施肥的污水污泥和消化液中的肠杆菌。","authors":"Angelina Wójcik-Fatla, Ewelina Farian, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Jacek Sroka, Piotr Skowron, Grzegorz Siebielec, Jolanta Małgorzata Zdybel, Tamara Jadczyszyn, Tomasz Cencek","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13121056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substances of organic origin are seeing increasing use in agriculture as rich sources of nutrients for plants. The aim of this study was to determine the microbiological contamination of sewage sludge and digestate to assess their safe use as fertilizers in Poland. The assessment of microbial soil, sewage sludge and digestate contamination was based on the total number of mesophilic bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria from the <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> family. The presence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> spp. was identified via culture and the presence of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> species was determined via biochemical and molecular methods. In laboratory conditions, the survival of <i>E. coli</i> in soil fertilized with sewage sludge or digestate inoculated with a reference strain was determined. The average concentration of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> in soil, sewage sludge and digestate samples was 1.1 × 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/g, 9.4 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/g and 5.6 × 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/g, respectively. <i>Escherichia coli</i> was detected in all sample types. From the soil samples, <i>Serratia</i>, <i>Enterobacter</i>, <i>Pantoea</i>, <i>Citrobacter</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> genera were identified the most frequently, while in sewage sludge and digestate, <i>E. coli</i> was predominant. Based on the results of our laboratory experiment, it can be concluded that after three weeks, fertilization with organic waste in acceptable doses does not significantly increase soil contamination with <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> in Sewage Sludge and Digestate Intended for Soil Fertilization.\",\"authors\":\"Angelina Wójcik-Fatla, Ewelina Farian, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Jacek Sroka, Piotr Skowron, Grzegorz Siebielec, Jolanta Małgorzata Zdybel, Tamara Jadczyszyn, Tomasz Cencek\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens13121056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Substances of organic origin are seeing increasing use in agriculture as rich sources of nutrients for plants. The aim of this study was to determine the microbiological contamination of sewage sludge and digestate to assess their safe use as fertilizers in Poland. The assessment of microbial soil, sewage sludge and digestate contamination was based on the total number of mesophilic bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria from the <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> family. The presence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> spp. was identified via culture and the presence of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> species was determined via biochemical and molecular methods. In laboratory conditions, the survival of <i>E. coli</i> in soil fertilized with sewage sludge or digestate inoculated with a reference strain was determined. The average concentration of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> in soil, sewage sludge and digestate samples was 1.1 × 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/g, 9.4 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/g and 5.6 × 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/g, respectively. <i>Escherichia coli</i> was detected in all sample types. From the soil samples, <i>Serratia</i>, <i>Enterobacter</i>, <i>Pantoea</i>, <i>Citrobacter</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> genera were identified the most frequently, while in sewage sludge and digestate, <i>E. coli</i> was predominant. Based on the results of our laboratory experiment, it can be concluded that after three weeks, fertilization with organic waste in acceptable doses does not significantly increase soil contamination with <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为植物营养的丰富来源,有机物质在农业上的应用越来越广泛。本研究的目的是确定污水污泥和消化物的微生物污染,以评估其作为肥料在波兰的安全使用。微生物土壤、污水污泥和消化道污染的评价是基于肠杆菌科嗜酸性细菌和革兰氏阴性细菌的总数。通过培养鉴定大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的存在,通过生化和分子方法鉴定肠杆菌科的存在。在实验室条件下,用接种参考菌株的污泥或消化液施肥土壤,测定大肠杆菌的存活率。土壤、污水污泥和消化样品中肠杆菌科细菌的平均浓度分别为1.1 × 104 CFU/g、9.4 × 105 CFU/g和5.6 × 106 CFU/g。所有样品中均检出大肠杆菌。土壤样品中以沙雷氏菌属、肠杆菌属、泛菌属、柠檬酸杆菌属和假单胞菌属最常见,污泥和消化液中以大肠杆菌属为主。根据我们实验室的实验结果,可以得出结论,在三周后,在可接受的剂量下使用有机废物施肥不会显著增加肠杆菌科土壤污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enterobacteriaceae in Sewage Sludge and Digestate Intended for Soil Fertilization.

Substances of organic origin are seeing increasing use in agriculture as rich sources of nutrients for plants. The aim of this study was to determine the microbiological contamination of sewage sludge and digestate to assess their safe use as fertilizers in Poland. The assessment of microbial soil, sewage sludge and digestate contamination was based on the total number of mesophilic bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family. The presence of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. was identified via culture and the presence of Enterobacteriaceae species was determined via biochemical and molecular methods. In laboratory conditions, the survival of E. coli in soil fertilized with sewage sludge or digestate inoculated with a reference strain was determined. The average concentration of Enterobacteriaceae in soil, sewage sludge and digestate samples was 1.1 × 104 CFU/g, 9.4 × 105 CFU/g and 5.6 × 106 CFU/g, respectively. Escherichia coli was detected in all sample types. From the soil samples, Serratia, Enterobacter, Pantoea, Citrobacter and Pseudomonas genera were identified the most frequently, while in sewage sludge and digestate, E. coli was predominant. Based on the results of our laboratory experiment, it can be concluded that after three weeks, fertilization with organic waste in acceptable doses does not significantly increase soil contamination with Enterobacteriaceae.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信