激素治疗与美国女性神经胶质瘤风险之间的关系:一项癌症筛查试验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jinyu Pan, Chuan Shao, Chao Xu, Gang Zhang, Haotian Jiang, Tao Tang, Hui Tang, Nan Wu
{"title":"激素治疗与美国女性神经胶质瘤风险之间的关系:一项癌症筛查试验。","authors":"Jinyu Pan, Chuan Shao, Chao Xu, Gang Zhang, Haotian Jiang, Tao Tang, Hui Tang, Nan Wu","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults, and the role of hormone therapy (HT) in their development remains controversial. This study with a cohort design aimed to investigate the association between HT use and glioma risk using the data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 75,335 women, aged 50-78, who were enrolled between 1993 and 2001. The median follow-up period was 11.82 years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between HT use and glioma risk, adjusting for various potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the follow-up period, 101 participants were diagnosed with glioma. After adjusting for relevant variables, there was no significant association between HT use and glioma risk (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.75-1.81). Similarly, no significant associations were found when considering HT status or duration of use. However, in subgroup analysis by education, marital status, body mass index, oral contraceptive, hysterectomy, ovariectomy, ever been pregnant, age at menarche, and age at menopause, we found that a significant positive association was only observed in the group with at least college graduate (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.02-8.84). The interaction effect for education was not significant (P = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest no overall link between HT use and glioma risk. Further research is needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between hormone therapy and glioma risk in US women: a cancer screening trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jinyu Pan, Chuan Shao, Chao Xu, Gang Zhang, Haotian Jiang, Tao Tang, Hui Tang, Nan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GME.0000000000002507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults, and the role of hormone therapy (HT) in their development remains controversial. This study with a cohort design aimed to investigate the association between HT use and glioma risk using the data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 75,335 women, aged 50-78, who were enrolled between 1993 and 2001. The median follow-up period was 11.82 years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between HT use and glioma risk, adjusting for various potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the follow-up period, 101 participants were diagnosed with glioma. After adjusting for relevant variables, there was no significant association between HT use and glioma risk (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.75-1.81). Similarly, no significant associations were found when considering HT status or duration of use. However, in subgroup analysis by education, marital status, body mass index, oral contraceptive, hysterectomy, ovariectomy, ever been pregnant, age at menarche, and age at menopause, we found that a significant positive association was only observed in the group with at least college graduate (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.02-8.84). The interaction effect for education was not significant (P = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest no overall link between HT use and glioma risk. Further research is needed to confirm these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002507\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胶质瘤是成人最常见的原发性脑肿瘤,激素治疗在其发展中的作用仍存在争议。本研究采用队列设计,旨在利用前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验的数据,调查激素使用与胶质瘤风险之间的关系。方法:我们分析了1993年至2001年间入组的75,335名年龄在50-78岁之间的女性的数据。中位随访期为11.82年。Cox比例风险模型用于估计HT使用与胶质瘤风险之间关系的风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci),并对各种潜在混杂因素进行调整。结果:在随访期间,101名参与者被诊断为胶质瘤。在对相关变量进行调整后,HT使用与胶质瘤风险之间无显著关联(HR, 1.16;95% ci, 0.75-1.81)。同样,当考虑HT状态或使用时间时,没有发现显著的关联。然而,在按教育程度、婚姻状况、体重指数、口服避孕药、子宫切除术、卵巢切除术、曾经怀孕、初潮年龄和绝经年龄进行的亚组分析中,我们发现只有在至少有大学学历的组中才观察到显著的正相关(HR, 3.00;95% ci, 1.02-8.84)。教育方面的交互效应不显著(P = 0.056)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,激素治疗与胶质瘤风险之间没有总体联系。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between hormone therapy and glioma risk in US women: a cancer screening trial.

Objective: Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults, and the role of hormone therapy (HT) in their development remains controversial. This study with a cohort design aimed to investigate the association between HT use and glioma risk using the data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Methods: We analyzed data from 75,335 women, aged 50-78, who were enrolled between 1993 and 2001. The median follow-up period was 11.82 years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between HT use and glioma risk, adjusting for various potential confounders.

Results: Over the follow-up period, 101 participants were diagnosed with glioma. After adjusting for relevant variables, there was no significant association between HT use and glioma risk (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.75-1.81). Similarly, no significant associations were found when considering HT status or duration of use. However, in subgroup analysis by education, marital status, body mass index, oral contraceptive, hysterectomy, ovariectomy, ever been pregnant, age at menarche, and age at menopause, we found that a significant positive association was only observed in the group with at least college graduate (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.02-8.84). The interaction effect for education was not significant (P = 0.056).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest no overall link between HT use and glioma risk. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信