慢性淋巴水肿的外科治疗进展:当前策略和未来方向。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sai Anusha Sanka, Sophia Chryssofos, Rachel A Anolik, Justin M Sacks
{"title":"慢性淋巴水肿的外科治疗进展:当前策略和未来方向。","authors":"Sai Anusha Sanka, Sophia Chryssofos, Rachel A Anolik, Justin M Sacks","doi":"10.1007/s12032-024-02576-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial tissue, resulting in edema and a diminished quality of life. When first-line treatments like complete decongestive therapy (CDT) fail, surgical options are considered. These include physiological procedures like lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), which aim to restore lymphatic function, as well as reductive procedures such as liposuction and excisional techniques, which reduce limb volume. Previous studies have evaluated these surgeries, but the literature remains scattered. This rapid review consolidates current research on surgical treatments for lymphedema. We reviewed the PubMed database and included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and literature reviews published between 2014 and 2024. Studies were selected if they reported outcomes such as objective volume reduction, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), or infection rates. Nineteen publications were selected for review. The most common procedures represented were LVA (N = 12) and VLNT (N = 10), though reductive operations such as liposuction and radical excision were also represented. Both LVA and VLNT, either alone or combined, demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of volume reduction, QOL, and infection prevention. Reductive surgeries were effective in reducing long-term volume but had less favorable cosmetic outcomes and variable infection rates. Overall, while surgical approaches have proven beneficial, the variability in outcome measures and inconsistent follow-up periods limit comparability across studies. Further research is needed to better guide patients in selecting the most appropriate surgical option based on their lymphedema characteristics and personal goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18433,"journal":{"name":"Medical Oncology","volume":"42 2","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in surgical management of chronic lymphedema: current strategies and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"Sai Anusha Sanka, Sophia Chryssofos, Rachel A Anolik, Justin M Sacks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12032-024-02576-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial tissue, resulting in edema and a diminished quality of life. When first-line treatments like complete decongestive therapy (CDT) fail, surgical options are considered. These include physiological procedures like lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), which aim to restore lymphatic function, as well as reductive procedures such as liposuction and excisional techniques, which reduce limb volume. Previous studies have evaluated these surgeries, but the literature remains scattered. This rapid review consolidates current research on surgical treatments for lymphedema. We reviewed the PubMed database and included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and literature reviews published between 2014 and 2024. Studies were selected if they reported outcomes such as objective volume reduction, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), or infection rates. Nineteen publications were selected for review. The most common procedures represented were LVA (N = 12) and VLNT (N = 10), though reductive operations such as liposuction and radical excision were also represented. Both LVA and VLNT, either alone or combined, demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of volume reduction, QOL, and infection prevention. Reductive surgeries were effective in reducing long-term volume but had less favorable cosmetic outcomes and variable infection rates. Overall, while surgical approaches have proven beneficial, the variability in outcome measures and inconsistent follow-up periods limit comparability across studies. Further research is needed to better guide patients in selecting the most appropriate surgical option based on their lymphedema characteristics and personal goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02576-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02576-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淋巴水肿是一种慢性疾病,由富含蛋白质的液体积聚在间质组织中引起,导致水肿和生活质量下降。当一线治疗如完全减充血性治疗(CDT)失败时,考虑手术治疗。其中包括旨在恢复淋巴功能的生理手术,如淋巴窝吻合(LVA)和血管化淋巴结转移(VLNT),以及减少肢体体积的手术,如吸脂和切除技术。先前的研究已经评估了这些手术,但文献仍然分散。这篇快速回顾巩固了目前对淋巴水肿手术治疗的研究。我们回顾了PubMed数据库,包括2014年至2024年间发表的系统综述、荟萃分析、随机临床试验和文献综述。如果研究报告了客观体积缩小、患者报告的生活质量(QOL)或感染率等结果,则选择研究。选出19份出版物进行审查。最常见的手术是LVA (N = 12)和VLNT (N = 10),但也有减容手术,如吸脂和根治性切除。LVA和VLNT,无论是单独还是联合,在体积减小、生活质量和感染预防方面都显示出积极的结果。缩小手术是有效的减少长期体积,但有较差的美容效果和可变的感染率。总的来说,虽然手术方法已被证明是有益的,但结果测量的可变性和不一致的随访期限制了研究之间的可比性。需要进一步的研究来更好地指导患者根据他们的淋巴水肿特征和个人目标选择最合适的手术方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advances in surgical management of chronic lymphedema: current strategies and future directions.

Lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial tissue, resulting in edema and a diminished quality of life. When first-line treatments like complete decongestive therapy (CDT) fail, surgical options are considered. These include physiological procedures like lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), which aim to restore lymphatic function, as well as reductive procedures such as liposuction and excisional techniques, which reduce limb volume. Previous studies have evaluated these surgeries, but the literature remains scattered. This rapid review consolidates current research on surgical treatments for lymphedema. We reviewed the PubMed database and included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and literature reviews published between 2014 and 2024. Studies were selected if they reported outcomes such as objective volume reduction, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), or infection rates. Nineteen publications were selected for review. The most common procedures represented were LVA (N = 12) and VLNT (N = 10), though reductive operations such as liposuction and radical excision were also represented. Both LVA and VLNT, either alone or combined, demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of volume reduction, QOL, and infection prevention. Reductive surgeries were effective in reducing long-term volume but had less favorable cosmetic outcomes and variable infection rates. Overall, while surgical approaches have proven beneficial, the variability in outcome measures and inconsistent follow-up periods limit comparability across studies. Further research is needed to better guide patients in selecting the most appropriate surgical option based on their lymphedema characteristics and personal goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Oncology
Medical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Medical Oncology (MO) communicates the results of clinical and experimental research in oncology and hematology, particularly experimental therapeutics within the fields of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. It also provides state-of-the-art reviews on clinical and experimental therapies. Topics covered include immunobiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of malignant tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信