在长时间清醒状态下易受睡眠不足影响的驾驶员,其客观驾驶表现较差,但主观驾驶表现不佳。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katrina Nguyen, Claire Dunbar, Alisha Guyett, Kelsey Bickley, Duc Phuc Nguyen, Amy C Reynolds, Peter Catcheside, Hannah Scott, Maslin Hughes, Robert Adams, Leon Lack, Jennifer Cori, Mark E Howard, Clare Anderson, David Stevens, Nicole Lovato, Andrew Vakulin
{"title":"在长时间清醒状态下易受睡眠不足影响的驾驶员,其客观驾驶表现较差,但主观驾驶表现不佳。","authors":"Katrina Nguyen, Claire Dunbar, Alisha Guyett, Kelsey Bickley, Duc Phuc Nguyen, Amy C Reynolds, Peter Catcheside, Hannah Scott, Maslin Hughes, Robert Adams, Leon Lack, Jennifer Cori, Mark E Howard, Clare Anderson, David Stevens, Nicole Lovato, Andrew Vakulin","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleepiness-related errors are a leading cause of driving accidents, requiring drivers to effectively monitor sleepiness levels. However, there are inter-individual differences in driving performance after sleep loss, with some showing poor driving performance while others show minimal impairment. This research explored if there are differences in self-reported sleepiness and driving performance in healthy drivers who exhibited vulnerability or resistance to objective driving impairment following extended wakefulness. Thirty-two adults (female = 18, mean age = 33.0 ± 14.6 years) completed five × 60-min simulated drives across 29-hr of extended wakefulness. Subjective sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and subjective driving performance ratings (nine-point Likert scale) were assessed at 10-min intervals while driving. Cluster analysis using simulator steering deviation and crash data categorised participants as vulnerable (n = 16) or resistant (n = 16) to driving impairments following extended wakefulness. No differences in self-ratings between the vulnerable and resistant groups were observed except during the last drive (25 hr awake), where the vulnerable group reported higher sleepiness (p = 0.008) and worse driving performance (p = 0.001) than the resistant group. For each 1-point increase on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and subjective driving scales, the vulnerable group showed about threefold greater steering impairment relative to resistant drivers. Although self-reported sleepiness and driving performance were correlated with objective driving performance, vulnerable drivers reported similar sleepiness and driving performance as resistant drivers. Thus, self-reported sleepiness and driving performance are not reliably sensitive to sleep loss effects on objective driving performance, which may impact the vulnerable driver's decisions to continue driving and delay engagement in countermeasures to reduce crash risk (e.g. napping), warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poorer objective but not subjective driving performance in drivers vulnerable to sleep loss effects during extended wake.\",\"authors\":\"Katrina Nguyen, Claire Dunbar, Alisha Guyett, Kelsey Bickley, Duc Phuc Nguyen, Amy C Reynolds, Peter Catcheside, Hannah Scott, Maslin Hughes, Robert Adams, Leon Lack, Jennifer Cori, Mark E Howard, Clare Anderson, David Stevens, Nicole Lovato, Andrew Vakulin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.14455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sleepiness-related errors are a leading cause of driving accidents, requiring drivers to effectively monitor sleepiness levels. However, there are inter-individual differences in driving performance after sleep loss, with some showing poor driving performance while others show minimal impairment. This research explored if there are differences in self-reported sleepiness and driving performance in healthy drivers who exhibited vulnerability or resistance to objective driving impairment following extended wakefulness. Thirty-two adults (female = 18, mean age = 33.0 ± 14.6 years) completed five × 60-min simulated drives across 29-hr of extended wakefulness. Subjective sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and subjective driving performance ratings (nine-point Likert scale) were assessed at 10-min intervals while driving. Cluster analysis using simulator steering deviation and crash data categorised participants as vulnerable (n = 16) or resistant (n = 16) to driving impairments following extended wakefulness. No differences in self-ratings between the vulnerable and resistant groups were observed except during the last drive (25 hr awake), where the vulnerable group reported higher sleepiness (p = 0.008) and worse driving performance (p = 0.001) than the resistant group. For each 1-point increase on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and subjective driving scales, the vulnerable group showed about threefold greater steering impairment relative to resistant drivers. Although self-reported sleepiness and driving performance were correlated with objective driving performance, vulnerable drivers reported similar sleepiness and driving performance as resistant drivers. Thus, self-reported sleepiness and driving performance are not reliably sensitive to sleep loss effects on objective driving performance, which may impact the vulnerable driver's decisions to continue driving and delay engagement in countermeasures to reduce crash risk (e.g. napping), warranting further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与睡眠有关的错误是导致驾驶事故的主要原因,这就要求司机有效地监测睡眠水平。然而,睡眠不足后的驾驶表现存在个体差异,一些人的驾驶表现很差,而另一些人的驾驶表现很差。本研究探讨了在长时间清醒后表现出易受或抵抗客观驾驶损伤的健康驾驶员的自述困倦和驾驶表现是否存在差异。32名成年人(女性= 18岁,平均年龄= 33.0±14.6岁)在29小时的延长清醒状态下完成5 × 60分钟的模拟驾驶。在驾驶过程中,每隔10分钟对主观困倦程度(卡罗林斯卡困倦程度量表)和主观驾驶表现评分(李克特9分量表)进行评估。利用模拟器转向偏差和碰撞数据进行聚类分析,将参与者分为易受伤害(n = 16)和抗驾驶损伤(n = 16)。在最后一次驾驶(25小时清醒)中,弱势组报告的困倦程度(p = 0.008)高于抵抗组,驾驶表现(p = 0.001)较差。在卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表和主观驾驶量表上,每增加1分,弱势群体的转向障碍就比抵抗性司机高出三倍。尽管自我报告的困倦和驾驶表现与客观驾驶表现相关,但脆弱司机报告的困倦和驾驶表现与抵抗司机相似。因此,自我报告的困倦和驾驶表现对睡眠不足对客观驾驶表现的影响并不可靠,这可能会影响脆弱驾驶员继续驾驶的决定,并推迟采取应对措施以降低碰撞风险(例如午睡),值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poorer objective but not subjective driving performance in drivers vulnerable to sleep loss effects during extended wake.

Sleepiness-related errors are a leading cause of driving accidents, requiring drivers to effectively monitor sleepiness levels. However, there are inter-individual differences in driving performance after sleep loss, with some showing poor driving performance while others show minimal impairment. This research explored if there are differences in self-reported sleepiness and driving performance in healthy drivers who exhibited vulnerability or resistance to objective driving impairment following extended wakefulness. Thirty-two adults (female = 18, mean age = 33.0 ± 14.6 years) completed five × 60-min simulated drives across 29-hr of extended wakefulness. Subjective sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and subjective driving performance ratings (nine-point Likert scale) were assessed at 10-min intervals while driving. Cluster analysis using simulator steering deviation and crash data categorised participants as vulnerable (n = 16) or resistant (n = 16) to driving impairments following extended wakefulness. No differences in self-ratings between the vulnerable and resistant groups were observed except during the last drive (25 hr awake), where the vulnerable group reported higher sleepiness (p = 0.008) and worse driving performance (p = 0.001) than the resistant group. For each 1-point increase on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and subjective driving scales, the vulnerable group showed about threefold greater steering impairment relative to resistant drivers. Although self-reported sleepiness and driving performance were correlated with objective driving performance, vulnerable drivers reported similar sleepiness and driving performance as resistant drivers. Thus, self-reported sleepiness and driving performance are not reliably sensitive to sleep loss effects on objective driving performance, which may impact the vulnerable driver's decisions to continue driving and delay engagement in countermeasures to reduce crash risk (e.g. napping), warranting further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信