使用动态计算机辅助种植手术(CAIS)结合增强现实的种植体位置准确性:一项随机对照临床试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Dental Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004
Sirida Arunjaroensuk, Thanida Yotpibulwong, Po-Sung Fu, Jen-Chyan Wang, Chun-Cheng Hung, Nikos Mattheos, Atiphan Pimkhaokham
{"title":"使用动态计算机辅助种植手术(CAIS)结合增强现实的种植体位置准确性:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Sirida Arunjaroensuk, Thanida Yotpibulwong, Po-Sung Fu, Jen-Chyan Wang, Chun-Cheng Hung, Nikos Mattheos, Atiphan Pimkhaokham","doi":"10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is increasingly performed to reduce deviations in implant position. Dynamic CAIS or navigation systems provide instant display of implant drilling instruments and patient positions directly on the computer monitor. Augmented reality (AR) technology allows operators to visualize real-time information projected onto the lenses of AR glasses. Although AR is being used in medical applications, there are few clinical studies on applying AR glasses to dental implants. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to compare the accuracy of implant position using the dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients who needed a single dental implant were randomly divided into two groups: combined dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (AR glasses group, n = 10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (non-AR glasses group, n = 10). Three-dimensional (3D) deviations of implant platform, apex and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using independent t-tests (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D angular deviations in the AR glasses and non-AR glasses groups were 1.47 ± 1.01° and 2.42 ± 0.76°, respectively. Mean 3D entry point and apical deviations were 0.75 ± 0.45 mm and 0.87 ± 0.45 mm in the AR glasses group, whereas the non-AR glasses group were 1.11 ± 0.44 mm and 1.18 ± 0.50 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant position accuracy using dynamic CAIS with AR glasses was similar to dynamic CAIS without AR glasses during a single implant placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"19 Suppl 1","pages":"S44-S50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sirida Arunjaroensuk, Thanida Yotpibulwong, Po-Sung Fu, Jen-Chyan Wang, Chun-Cheng Hung, Nikos Mattheos, Atiphan Pimkhaokham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is increasingly performed to reduce deviations in implant position. Dynamic CAIS or navigation systems provide instant display of implant drilling instruments and patient positions directly on the computer monitor. Augmented reality (AR) technology allows operators to visualize real-time information projected onto the lenses of AR glasses. Although AR is being used in medical applications, there are few clinical studies on applying AR glasses to dental implants. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to compare the accuracy of implant position using the dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients who needed a single dental implant were randomly divided into two groups: combined dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (AR glasses group, n = 10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (non-AR glasses group, n = 10). Three-dimensional (3D) deviations of implant platform, apex and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using independent t-tests (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D angular deviations in the AR glasses and non-AR glasses groups were 1.47 ± 1.01° and 2.42 ± 0.76°, respectively. Mean 3D entry point and apical deviations were 0.75 ± 0.45 mm and 0.87 ± 0.45 mm in the AR glasses group, whereas the non-AR glasses group were 1.11 ± 0.44 mm and 1.18 ± 0.50 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant position accuracy using dynamic CAIS with AR glasses was similar to dynamic CAIS without AR glasses during a single implant placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S44-S50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:计算机辅助种植手术(CAIS)越来越多地用于减少种植体位置偏差。动态CAIS或导航系统直接在计算机显示器上提供植入钻孔器械和患者位置的即时显示。增强现实(AR)技术允许操作员将投影到AR眼镜镜片上的实时信息可视化。虽然AR正在医学上得到应用,但将AR眼镜应用于牙科植入物的临床研究却很少。本随机临床研究的目的是比较动态CAIS在配戴和不配戴AR眼镜时植入物位置的准确性。材料与方法:将20例需要单次种植牙的患者随机分为动态CAIS + AR眼镜组(AR眼镜组,n = 10)和动态CAIS + AR眼镜组(非AR眼镜组,n = 10)。采用独立t检验对种植体平台、顶点和角度的三维(3D)偏差进行测量和分析(P)。结果:AR眼镜组和非AR眼镜组的三维角度偏差分别为1.47±1.01°和2.42±0.76°。AR眼镜组的平均三维进入点和根尖偏差分别为0.75±0.45 mm和0.87±0.45 mm,非AR眼镜组的平均三维进入点和根尖偏差分别为1.11±0.44 mm和1.18±0.50 mm。两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:在单次种植体放置过程中,使用动态CAIS与不使用AR眼镜的动态CAIS的种植体位置精度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Background/purpose: Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is increasingly performed to reduce deviations in implant position. Dynamic CAIS or navigation systems provide instant display of implant drilling instruments and patient positions directly on the computer monitor. Augmented reality (AR) technology allows operators to visualize real-time information projected onto the lenses of AR glasses. Although AR is being used in medical applications, there are few clinical studies on applying AR glasses to dental implants. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to compare the accuracy of implant position using the dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses.

Materials and methods: Twenty patients who needed a single dental implant were randomly divided into two groups: combined dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (AR glasses group, n = 10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (non-AR glasses group, n = 10). Three-dimensional (3D) deviations of implant platform, apex and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using independent t-tests (P < 0.05).

Results: The 3D angular deviations in the AR glasses and non-AR glasses groups were 1.47 ± 1.01° and 2.42 ± 0.76°, respectively. Mean 3D entry point and apical deviations were 0.75 ± 0.45 mm and 0.87 ± 0.45 mm in the AR glasses group, whereas the non-AR glasses group were 1.11 ± 0.44 mm and 1.18 ± 0.50 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion: Implant position accuracy using dynamic CAIS with AR glasses was similar to dynamic CAIS without AR glasses during a single implant placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Sciences
Journal of Dental Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: he Journal of Dental Sciences (JDS), published quarterly, is the official and open access publication of the Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China (ADS-ROC). The precedent journal of the JDS is the Chinese Dental Journal (CDJ) which had already been covered by MEDLINE in 1988. As the CDJ continued to prove its importance in the region, the ADS-ROC decided to move to the international community by publishing an English journal. Hence, the birth of the JDS in 2006. The JDS is indexed in the SCI Expanded since 2008. It is also indexed in Scopus, and EMCare, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. The topics covered by the JDS include all fields of basic and clinical dentistry. Some manuscripts focusing on the study of certain endemic diseases such as dental caries and periodontal diseases in particular regions of any country as well as oral pre-cancers, oral cancers, and oral submucous fibrosis related to betel nut chewing habit are also considered for publication. Besides, the JDS also publishes articles about the efficacy of a new treatment modality on oral verrucous hyperplasia or early oral squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信