{"title":"18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT和18F-FDG PET/CT在恶性消化系统肿瘤患者中的对比研究","authors":"Min Xiong, HongJi You, Jingmin Feng, Yipei Liu, Xiaoming Luo, Ying Liu, Sheng-Nan Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s11307-025-01982-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radionuclide-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) is an emerging tumor tracer. We sought to assess the uptake and diagnostic performance of <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT compared with simultaneous 2-deoxy-2[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-D-glucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions in patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms and to determine the potential clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>Forty-two patients (men = 30, women = 12, mean age = 56.71 ± 13.26 years) who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT simultaneously for diagnosis, staging, and restaging were enrolled. Quantitative data, including standardized uptake value (SUV), tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), and tumor-to-blood pool ratio (TBR), were analyzed. Two independent readers performed a visual assessment of lesion number and location on PET/CT images. Interobserver agreement between two examinations was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary tumor locations included the liver (n = 20), stomach (n = 9), pancreas (n = 5), and intestine (n = 10). More intense <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 uptake and higher tumor-to-background contrast were detected in most primary and metastatic lesions compared with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, contributing to improved diagnostic accuracy ranging from 95.24% to 100%. Moreover, additional lesions showing <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 uptake in primary, locoregional and distant metastatic lesions were visualized, especially in multiple liver and peritoneal metastases. Patient-based interobserver agreement varied from moderate to strong, with suboptimal outcomes observed in primary tumors (κ = 0.441, P = 0.01) and preferable results derived from metastatic liver and bone lesions (κ = 1 and 0.896, both P < 0.01). <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT resulted in modified treatment strategies for 40.48% (17/42) of patients, while <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT led to altered therapeutic regimens in only 4.8% (2/42) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In selected patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms, our study shows that <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT is a promising alternative for assessing primary tumors and metastases and aiding staging, restaging, and decision-making, with higher uptake and better lesion visualization compared with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. Additionally, it may shed light into the treatment selection and response assessment for FAP-targeted therapy or immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18760,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging and Biology","volume":" ","pages":"131-141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Malignant Digestive System Neoplasms: A Head-to-Head Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Min Xiong, HongJi You, Jingmin Feng, Yipei Liu, Xiaoming Luo, Ying Liu, Sheng-Nan Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11307-025-01982-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radionuclide-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) is an emerging tumor tracer. We sought to assess the uptake and diagnostic performance of <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT compared with simultaneous 2-deoxy-2[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-D-glucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions in patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms and to determine the potential clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>Forty-two patients (men = 30, women = 12, mean age = 56.71 ± 13.26 years) who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT simultaneously for diagnosis, staging, and restaging were enrolled. Quantitative data, including standardized uptake value (SUV), tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), and tumor-to-blood pool ratio (TBR), were analyzed. Two independent readers performed a visual assessment of lesion number and location on PET/CT images. Interobserver agreement between two examinations was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary tumor locations included the liver (n = 20), stomach (n = 9), pancreas (n = 5), and intestine (n = 10). More intense <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 uptake and higher tumor-to-background contrast were detected in most primary and metastatic lesions compared with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, contributing to improved diagnostic accuracy ranging from 95.24% to 100%. Moreover, additional lesions showing <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 uptake in primary, locoregional and distant metastatic lesions were visualized, especially in multiple liver and peritoneal metastases. Patient-based interobserver agreement varied from moderate to strong, with suboptimal outcomes observed in primary tumors (κ = 0.441, P = 0.01) and preferable results derived from metastatic liver and bone lesions (κ = 1 and 0.896, both P < 0.01). <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT resulted in modified treatment strategies for 40.48% (17/42) of patients, while <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT led to altered therapeutic regimens in only 4.8% (2/42) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In selected patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms, our study shows that <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT is a promising alternative for assessing primary tumors and metastases and aiding staging, restaging, and decision-making, with higher uptake and better lesion visualization compared with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. Additionally, it may shed light into the treatment selection and response assessment for FAP-targeted therapy or immunotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Imaging and Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"131-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Imaging and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-025-01982-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-025-01982-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Malignant Digestive System Neoplasms: A Head-to-Head Comparative Study.
Purpose: Radionuclide-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) is an emerging tumor tracer. We sought to assess the uptake and diagnostic performance of 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT compared with simultaneous 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions in patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms and to determine the potential clinical benefit.
Procedures: Forty-two patients (men = 30, women = 12, mean age = 56.71 ± 13.26 years) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT simultaneously for diagnosis, staging, and restaging were enrolled. Quantitative data, including standardized uptake value (SUV), tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), and tumor-to-blood pool ratio (TBR), were analyzed. Two independent readers performed a visual assessment of lesion number and location on PET/CT images. Interobserver agreement between two examinations was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ).
Results: Primary tumor locations included the liver (n = 20), stomach (n = 9), pancreas (n = 5), and intestine (n = 10). More intense 18F-FAPI-42 uptake and higher tumor-to-background contrast were detected in most primary and metastatic lesions compared with 18F-FDG, contributing to improved diagnostic accuracy ranging from 95.24% to 100%. Moreover, additional lesions showing 18F-FAPI-42 uptake in primary, locoregional and distant metastatic lesions were visualized, especially in multiple liver and peritoneal metastases. Patient-based interobserver agreement varied from moderate to strong, with suboptimal outcomes observed in primary tumors (κ = 0.441, P = 0.01) and preferable results derived from metastatic liver and bone lesions (κ = 1 and 0.896, both P < 0.01). 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT resulted in modified treatment strategies for 40.48% (17/42) of patients, while 18F-FDG PET/CT led to altered therapeutic regimens in only 4.8% (2/42) of patients.
Conclusions: In selected patients with malignant digestive system neoplasms, our study shows that 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT is a promising alternative for assessing primary tumors and metastases and aiding staging, restaging, and decision-making, with higher uptake and better lesion visualization compared with 18F-FDG. Additionally, it may shed light into the treatment selection and response assessment for FAP-targeted therapy or immunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Imaging and Biology (MIB) invites original contributions (research articles, review articles, commentaries, etc.) on the utilization of molecular imaging (i.e., nuclear imaging, optical imaging, autoradiography and pathology, MRI, MPI, ultrasound imaging, radiomics/genomics etc.) to investigate questions related to biology and health. The objective of MIB is to provide a forum to the discovery of molecular mechanisms of disease through the use of imaging techniques. We aim to investigate the biological nature of disease in patients and establish new molecular imaging diagnostic and therapy procedures.
Some areas that are covered are:
Preclinical and clinical imaging of macromolecular targets (e.g., genes, receptors, enzymes) involved in significant biological processes.
The design, characterization, and study of new molecular imaging probes and contrast agents for the functional interrogation of macromolecular targets.
Development and evaluation of imaging systems including instrumentation, image reconstruction algorithms, image analysis, and display.
Development of molecular assay approaches leading to quantification of the biological information obtained in molecular imaging.
Study of in vivo animal models of disease for the development of new molecular diagnostics and therapeutics.
Extension of in vitro and in vivo discoveries using disease models, into well designed clinical research investigations.
Clinical molecular imaging involving clinical investigations, clinical trials and medical management or cost-effectiveness studies.