深度学习算法和基于视频的动作捕捉系统在抓举运动学估计中的准确性评估。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.70252/PRVV4165
Federico Thiele, Florian Paternoster, Chris Hummel, Fabian Stöcker, Denis Holzer
{"title":"深度学习算法和基于视频的动作捕捉系统在抓举运动学估计中的准确性评估。","authors":"Federico Thiele, Florian Paternoster, Chris Hummel, Fabian Stöcker, Denis Holzer","doi":"10.70252/PRVV4165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In weightlifting, quantitative kinematic analysis is essential for evaluating snatch performance. While marker-based (MB) approaches are commonly used, they are impractical for training or competitions. Markerless video-based (VB) systems utilizing deep learning-based pose estimation algorithms could address this issue. This study assessed the comparability and applicability of VB systems in obtaining snatch kinematics by comparing the outcomes to an MB reference system. 21 weightlifters (15 Male, 6 Female) performed 2-3 snatches at 65%, 75%, and 80% of their one-repetition maximum. Snatch kinematics were analyzed using an MB (Vicon Nexus) and VB (Contemplas along with Theia3D) system. Analysis of 131 trials revealed that corresponding lower limb joint center positions of the systems on average differed by 4.7 ± 1.2 cm, and upper limb joint centers by 5.7 ± 1.5 cm. VB and MB lower limb joint angles showed highest agreement in the frontal plane (root mean square difference (RMSD): 11.2 ± 5.9°), followed by the sagittal plane (RMSD: 13.6 ± 4.7°). Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis revealed significant differences throughout most of the movement for all degrees of freedom. Maximum extension angles and velocities during the second pull displayed significant differences (p < .05) for the lower limbs. Our data showed significant differences in estimated kinematics between both systems, indicating a lack of comparability. These differences are likely due to differing models and assumptions, rather than measurement accuracy. However, given the rapid advancements of neural network-based approaches, it holds promise to become a suitable alternative to MB systems in weightlifting analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 1","pages":"1629-1647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Accuracy of a Deep Learning Algorithm- and Video-based Motion Capture System in Estimating Snatch Kinematics.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Thiele, Florian Paternoster, Chris Hummel, Fabian Stöcker, Denis Holzer\",\"doi\":\"10.70252/PRVV4165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In weightlifting, quantitative kinematic analysis is essential for evaluating snatch performance. While marker-based (MB) approaches are commonly used, they are impractical for training or competitions. Markerless video-based (VB) systems utilizing deep learning-based pose estimation algorithms could address this issue. This study assessed the comparability and applicability of VB systems in obtaining snatch kinematics by comparing the outcomes to an MB reference system. 21 weightlifters (15 Male, 6 Female) performed 2-3 snatches at 65%, 75%, and 80% of their one-repetition maximum. Snatch kinematics were analyzed using an MB (Vicon Nexus) and VB (Contemplas along with Theia3D) system. Analysis of 131 trials revealed that corresponding lower limb joint center positions of the systems on average differed by 4.7 ± 1.2 cm, and upper limb joint centers by 5.7 ± 1.5 cm. VB and MB lower limb joint angles showed highest agreement in the frontal plane (root mean square difference (RMSD): 11.2 ± 5.9°), followed by the sagittal plane (RMSD: 13.6 ± 4.7°). Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis revealed significant differences throughout most of the movement for all degrees of freedom. Maximum extension angles and velocities during the second pull displayed significant differences (p < .05) for the lower limbs. Our data showed significant differences in estimated kinematics between both systems, indicating a lack of comparability. These differences are likely due to differing models and assumptions, rather than measurement accuracy. However, given the rapid advancements of neural network-based approaches, it holds promise to become a suitable alternative to MB systems in weightlifting analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1629-1647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70252/PRVV4165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/PRVV4165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在举重运动中,定量的运动学分析是评价抓举成绩的必要条件。虽然基于标记(MB)的方法通常被使用,但它们对于训练或比赛是不切实际的。利用基于深度学习的姿态估计算法的无标记视频(VB)系统可以解决这个问题。本研究通过将结果与MB参考系统进行比较,评估了VB系统在获得抓举运动学方面的可比性和适用性。21名举重运动员(15名男性,6名女性)以65%,75%和80%的最高单次重复完成2-3次抓举。使用MB (Vicon Nexus)和VB (Contemplas以及Theia3D)系统分析抓举运动学。131项试验分析显示,各系统对应的下肢关节中心位置平均相差4.7±1.2 cm,上肢关节中心位置平均相差5.7±1.5 cm。VB和MB下肢关节角度在额平面一致性最高(均方根差(RMSD): 11.2±5.9°),其次是矢状面(RMSD: 13.6±4.7°)。统计参数映射分析显示,在所有自由度的大多数运动中存在显著差异。第二次牵拉时下肢的最大伸展角度和速度差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。我们的数据显示两种系统在估计运动学方面存在显著差异,表明缺乏可比性。这些差异可能是由于不同的模型和假设,而不是测量精度。然而,鉴于基于神经网络的方法的快速发展,它有望成为举重分析中MB系统的合适替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the Accuracy of a Deep Learning Algorithm- and Video-based Motion Capture System in Estimating Snatch Kinematics.

In weightlifting, quantitative kinematic analysis is essential for evaluating snatch performance. While marker-based (MB) approaches are commonly used, they are impractical for training or competitions. Markerless video-based (VB) systems utilizing deep learning-based pose estimation algorithms could address this issue. This study assessed the comparability and applicability of VB systems in obtaining snatch kinematics by comparing the outcomes to an MB reference system. 21 weightlifters (15 Male, 6 Female) performed 2-3 snatches at 65%, 75%, and 80% of their one-repetition maximum. Snatch kinematics were analyzed using an MB (Vicon Nexus) and VB (Contemplas along with Theia3D) system. Analysis of 131 trials revealed that corresponding lower limb joint center positions of the systems on average differed by 4.7 ± 1.2 cm, and upper limb joint centers by 5.7 ± 1.5 cm. VB and MB lower limb joint angles showed highest agreement in the frontal plane (root mean square difference (RMSD): 11.2 ± 5.9°), followed by the sagittal plane (RMSD: 13.6 ± 4.7°). Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis revealed significant differences throughout most of the movement for all degrees of freedom. Maximum extension angles and velocities during the second pull displayed significant differences (p < .05) for the lower limbs. Our data showed significant differences in estimated kinematics between both systems, indicating a lack of comparability. These differences are likely due to differing models and assumptions, rather than measurement accuracy. However, given the rapid advancements of neural network-based approaches, it holds promise to become a suitable alternative to MB systems in weightlifting analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信