心率和血压反应不同的血流量限制袖带类型。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.70252/MQOB1046
Daniela Rincon-Garcia, Abbey C Hafler, Rebecca F Rodriguez, Erica M Marshall
{"title":"心率和血压反应不同的血流量限制袖带类型。","authors":"Daniela Rincon-Garcia, Abbey C Hafler, Rebecca F Rodriguez, Erica M Marshall","doi":"10.70252/MQOB1046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to compare heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following high load resistance exercise (HLRE) and blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) with a knee wrap (kBFRE) and pneumatic cuff (pBFRE). Eleven men (N = 9) and women (N = 2) participated. HR, SBP, and DBP were collected at Rest, immediately post exercise (IP), 10-, 30-, and 45-minutes post exercise. Repeated measures ANOVAs assessed the effects of condition across time on all variables. Significant effects were examined with pairwise comparisons and a Sidak correction. Significance was defined a priori p ≤ 0.05. There were significant condition by time interactions for HR (p = 0.005; ES = 0.31), SBP (p = 0.016; ES = 0.27), and DBP (p = 0.03; ES = 0.24). There were significant main effects of time for HR (p < 0.001; ES = 0.78), SBP (p < 0.001; ES = 0.84), and DBP (p = 0.004; ES = 0.44). The HR was increased from Rest for up to 45 minutes across all conditions. IP, the HR was lower following pBFRE compared to HLRE. There was an increase in SBP at IP. SBP was higher following HLRE compared to kBFRE and pBFRE. DBP was decreased at 10 minutes across all conditions, with kBFRE prompting larger reductions compared to HLRE at 10 minutes. DBP was lower following kBFRE compared to pBFRE at 45 minutes. This study suggests that BFRE alters cardiovascular function differently than HLRE, but is dependent on cuff type. Specifically, pneumatic cuffs may attenuate the increase in the HR and SBP response, and knee wraps augment the reduction in DBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 2","pages":"1568-1576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Responses Vary Between Blood Flow Restriction Cuff Type.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Rincon-Garcia, Abbey C Hafler, Rebecca F Rodriguez, Erica M Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.70252/MQOB1046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to compare heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following high load resistance exercise (HLRE) and blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) with a knee wrap (kBFRE) and pneumatic cuff (pBFRE). Eleven men (N = 9) and women (N = 2) participated. HR, SBP, and DBP were collected at Rest, immediately post exercise (IP), 10-, 30-, and 45-minutes post exercise. Repeated measures ANOVAs assessed the effects of condition across time on all variables. Significant effects were examined with pairwise comparisons and a Sidak correction. Significance was defined a priori p ≤ 0.05. There were significant condition by time interactions for HR (p = 0.005; ES = 0.31), SBP (p = 0.016; ES = 0.27), and DBP (p = 0.03; ES = 0.24). There were significant main effects of time for HR (p < 0.001; ES = 0.78), SBP (p < 0.001; ES = 0.84), and DBP (p = 0.004; ES = 0.44). The HR was increased from Rest for up to 45 minutes across all conditions. IP, the HR was lower following pBFRE compared to HLRE. There was an increase in SBP at IP. SBP was higher following HLRE compared to kBFRE and pBFRE. DBP was decreased at 10 minutes across all conditions, with kBFRE prompting larger reductions compared to HLRE at 10 minutes. DBP was lower following kBFRE compared to pBFRE at 45 minutes. This study suggests that BFRE alters cardiovascular function differently than HLRE, but is dependent on cuff type. Specifically, pneumatic cuffs may attenuate the increase in the HR and SBP response, and knee wraps augment the reduction in DBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"1568-1576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70252/MQOB1046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/MQOB1046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究的目的是比较高负荷阻力运动(HLRE)和血流量限制运动(BFRE)后的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP),其中膝部包裹(kBFRE)和气动袖带(pffr)。11名男性(N = 9)和女性(N = 2)参与。心率、收缩压和舒张压分别在休息、运动后立即、运动后10分钟、30分钟和45分钟采集。重复测量方差分析评估了不同时间条件对所有变量的影响。通过两两比较和Sidak校正检验显著效应。先验p≤0.05定义显著性。时间交互作用对HR有显著影响(p = 0.005;ES = 0.31),收缩压(p = 0.016;ES = 0.27), DBP (p = 0.03;Es = 0.24)。时间对HR有显著的主效应(p < 0.001;ES = 0.78),收缩压(p < 0.001;ES = 0.84), DBP (p = 0.004;Es = 0.44)。在所有条件下,人力资源从休息增加到45分钟。与HLRE相比,pBFRE后HR较低。在IP时收缩压升高。与kBFRE和pBFRE相比,HLRE后收缩压升高。在所有情况下,舒张压在10分钟时均有所下降,与HLRE相比,kBFRE在10分钟时的舒张压下降幅度更大。45分钟时,kBFRE后DBP低于pBFRE。本研究提示BFRE对心血管功能的改变不同于HLRE,但取决于袖带类型。具体来说,充气套可能会减弱HR和收缩压反应的增加,而膝部包裹会增加舒张压的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Responses Vary Between Blood Flow Restriction Cuff Type.

The purpose of the study was to compare heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following high load resistance exercise (HLRE) and blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) with a knee wrap (kBFRE) and pneumatic cuff (pBFRE). Eleven men (N = 9) and women (N = 2) participated. HR, SBP, and DBP were collected at Rest, immediately post exercise (IP), 10-, 30-, and 45-minutes post exercise. Repeated measures ANOVAs assessed the effects of condition across time on all variables. Significant effects were examined with pairwise comparisons and a Sidak correction. Significance was defined a priori p ≤ 0.05. There were significant condition by time interactions for HR (p = 0.005; ES = 0.31), SBP (p = 0.016; ES = 0.27), and DBP (p = 0.03; ES = 0.24). There were significant main effects of time for HR (p < 0.001; ES = 0.78), SBP (p < 0.001; ES = 0.84), and DBP (p = 0.004; ES = 0.44). The HR was increased from Rest for up to 45 minutes across all conditions. IP, the HR was lower following pBFRE compared to HLRE. There was an increase in SBP at IP. SBP was higher following HLRE compared to kBFRE and pBFRE. DBP was decreased at 10 minutes across all conditions, with kBFRE prompting larger reductions compared to HLRE at 10 minutes. DBP was lower following kBFRE compared to pBFRE at 45 minutes. This study suggests that BFRE alters cardiovascular function differently than HLRE, but is dependent on cuff type. Specifically, pneumatic cuffs may attenuate the increase in the HR and SBP response, and knee wraps augment the reduction in DBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信