用于黄斑孔手术视觉结果预测的监督机器学习统计模型:一项单一外科医生的标准化手术研究。

IF 1.9 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kanika Godani, Vishma Prabhu, Priyanka Gandhi, Ayushi Choudhary, Shubham Darade, Rupal Kathare, Prathiba Hande, Ramesh Venkatesh
{"title":"用于黄斑孔手术视觉结果预测的监督机器学习统计模型:一项单一外科医生的标准化手术研究。","authors":"Kanika Godani, Vishma Prabhu, Priyanka Gandhi, Ayushi Choudhary, Shubham Darade, Rupal Kathare, Prathiba Hande, Ramesh Venkatesh","doi":"10.1186/s40942-025-00630-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the predictive accuracy of various machine learning (ML) statistical models in forecasting postoperative visual acuity (VA) outcomes following macular hole (MH) surgery using preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 158 eyes (151 patients) with full-thickness MHs treated between 2017 and 2023 by the same surgeon and using the same intraoperative surgical technique. Data from electronic medical records and OCT scans were extracted, with OCT-derived qualitative and quantitative MH characteristics recorded. Six supervised ML models-ANCOVA, Random Forest (RF) regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Lasso regression-were trained using an 80:20 training-to-testing split. Model performance was evaluated on an independent testing dataset using the XLSTAT software. In total, the ML statistical models were trained and tested on 14,652 OCT data points from 1332 OCT images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 91% achieved MH closure post-surgery, with a median VA gain of -0.3 logMAR units. The RF regression model outperformed other ML models, achieving the lowest mean square error (MSE = 0.038) on internal validation. The most significant predictors of VA were postoperative MH closure status (variable importance = 43.078) and MH area index (21.328). The model accurately predicted the post-operative VA within 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 logMAR units in 61%, 78%, and 87% of OCT images, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RF regression model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for forecasting postoperative VA, suggesting ML-driven approaches may improve surgical planning and patient counselling by providing reliable insights into expected visual outcomes based on pre-operative OCT features.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":"11 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supervised machine learning statistical models for visual outcome prediction in macular hole surgery: a single-surgeon, standardized surgery study.\",\"authors\":\"Kanika Godani, Vishma Prabhu, Priyanka Gandhi, Ayushi Choudhary, Shubham Darade, Rupal Kathare, Prathiba Hande, Ramesh Venkatesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40942-025-00630-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the predictive accuracy of various machine learning (ML) statistical models in forecasting postoperative visual acuity (VA) outcomes following macular hole (MH) surgery using preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 158 eyes (151 patients) with full-thickness MHs treated between 2017 and 2023 by the same surgeon and using the same intraoperative surgical technique. Data from electronic medical records and OCT scans were extracted, with OCT-derived qualitative and quantitative MH characteristics recorded. Six supervised ML models-ANCOVA, Random Forest (RF) regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Lasso regression-were trained using an 80:20 training-to-testing split. Model performance was evaluated on an independent testing dataset using the XLSTAT software. In total, the ML statistical models were trained and tested on 14,652 OCT data points from 1332 OCT images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 91% achieved MH closure post-surgery, with a median VA gain of -0.3 logMAR units. The RF regression model outperformed other ML models, achieving the lowest mean square error (MSE = 0.038) on internal validation. The most significant predictors of VA were postoperative MH closure status (variable importance = 43.078) and MH area index (21.328). The model accurately predicted the post-operative VA within 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 logMAR units in 61%, 78%, and 87% of OCT images, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RF regression model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for forecasting postoperative VA, suggesting ML-driven approaches may improve surgical planning and patient counselling by providing reliable insights into expected visual outcomes based on pre-operative OCT features.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00630-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00630-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估各种机器学习(ML)统计模型在利用术前光学相干断层扫描(OCT)参数预测黄斑孔(MH)手术后视力(VA)结果方面的预测准确性。方法:本回顾性研究包括158只眼(151例患者),于2017年至2023年间由同一外科医生采用相同术中手术技术治疗的全层MHs。从电子病历和OCT扫描中提取数据,记录OCT衍生的定性和定量MH特征。6个有监督的机器学习模型——ancova、随机森林(RF)回归、k近邻回归、支持向量机、极端梯度增强和Lasso回归——使用80:20的训练-测试分割进行训练。使用XLSTAT软件在独立的测试数据集上评估模型性能。总的来说,ML统计模型在1332张OCT图像中的14,652个数据点上进行了训练和测试。结果:总体而言,91%的患者术后实现了MH闭合,中位VA增益为-0.3 logMAR单位。RF回归模型优于其他ML模型,在内部验证中实现了最低的均方误差(MSE = 0.038)。术后MH闭合状态(变量重要度= 43.078)和MH面积指数(变量重要度= 21.328)是VA最显著的预测因素。在61%、78%和87%的OCT图像中,该模型分别在0.1、0.2和0.3 logMAR单位内准确预测了术后VA。结论:RF回归模型在预测术后VA方面表现出卓越的预测准确性,表明ml驱动的方法可以通过提供基于术前OCT特征的预期视觉结果的可靠见解来改善手术计划和患者咨询。临床试验注册号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supervised machine learning statistical models for visual outcome prediction in macular hole surgery: a single-surgeon, standardized surgery study.

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive accuracy of various machine learning (ML) statistical models in forecasting postoperative visual acuity (VA) outcomes following macular hole (MH) surgery using preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters.

Methods: This retrospective study included 158 eyes (151 patients) with full-thickness MHs treated between 2017 and 2023 by the same surgeon and using the same intraoperative surgical technique. Data from electronic medical records and OCT scans were extracted, with OCT-derived qualitative and quantitative MH characteristics recorded. Six supervised ML models-ANCOVA, Random Forest (RF) regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Lasso regression-were trained using an 80:20 training-to-testing split. Model performance was evaluated on an independent testing dataset using the XLSTAT software. In total, the ML statistical models were trained and tested on 14,652 OCT data points from 1332 OCT images.

Results: Overall, 91% achieved MH closure post-surgery, with a median VA gain of -0.3 logMAR units. The RF regression model outperformed other ML models, achieving the lowest mean square error (MSE = 0.038) on internal validation. The most significant predictors of VA were postoperative MH closure status (variable importance = 43.078) and MH area index (21.328). The model accurately predicted the post-operative VA within 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 logMAR units in 61%, 78%, and 87% of OCT images, respectively.

Conclusion: The RF regression model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for forecasting postoperative VA, suggesting ML-driven approaches may improve surgical planning and patient counselling by providing reliable insights into expected visual outcomes based on pre-operative OCT features.

Clinical trial registration number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信