观察和等待时代直肠癌新辅助治疗的临床反应等级与肿瘤预后的相关性

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Roni Rosen, Aron Bercz, Dana Omer, Floris S Verheij, Hannah Williams, Parisa Malekzadeh, Danielle Kong, Felipe F Quezada-Diaz, Iris Wei, Maria Widmar, Georgios Karagkounis, Diana Roth O'Brien, Carla Hajj, Christopher Crane, Ping Gu, Neil H Segal, Marina Shcherba, Karuna Ganesh, Rona Yaeger, Emmanouil Pappou, Paul B Romesser, Garrett M Nash, Leonard B Saltz, Andrea Cercek, Martin R Weiser, Mithat Gonen, Philip B Paty, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, J Joshua Smith
{"title":"观察和等待时代直肠癌新辅助治疗的临床反应等级与肿瘤预后的相关性","authors":"Roni Rosen, Aron Bercz, Dana Omer, Floris S Verheij, Hannah Williams, Parisa Malekzadeh, Danielle Kong, Felipe F Quezada-Diaz, Iris Wei, Maria Widmar, Georgios Karagkounis, Diana Roth O'Brien, Carla Hajj, Christopher Crane, Ping Gu, Neil H Segal, Marina Shcherba, Karuna Ganesh, Rona Yaeger, Emmanouil Pappou, Paul B Romesser, Garrett M Nash, Leonard B Saltz, Andrea Cercek, Martin R Weiser, Mithat Gonen, Philip B Paty, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, J Joshua Smith","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The watch-and-wait strategy provides an opportunity to pursue non-operative management in rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The management of those with near complete response remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed the oncologic outcomes of patients managed by watch-and-wait versus total mesorectal excision according to clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Comprehensive cancer center in New York.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between January 2006 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A watch-and-wait strategy of active surveillance was offered to patients if they achieved clinical complete response. Salvage surgery was utilized for watch-and-wait patients with local regrowth. Patients with an incomplete response underwent total mesorectal excision.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Local regrowth rate, organ preservation rate, disease-free survival and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 1230) were divided into 3 response cohorts-incomplete (n = 646), near-complete (n = 189) and complete (n = 395). Eighty-one (43%) patients in the near-complete group and 351 (89%) patients in the complete group entered watch-and-wait. Three-year local regrowth rates were 40% and 24% in the near-complete and complete response cohorts, respectively. The 5-year organ preservation rate was 53% in near-complete responders, and 73% in complete responders. Five-year disease-free survival increased with greater clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy with intermediate outcomes noted for patients with a near-complete (73%) compared to complete (82%) or incomplete response (68%). Overall survival at 5 years was similar between the three cohorts (complete 90%, near-complete 86%, and incomplete 85%).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved oncologic outcomes. Near-complete responders may avoid surgery and still achieve high organ preservation rates yet experience greater local regrowth rates than clinical complete response patients. Ongoing prospective trials integrating watch-and-wait after complete response as determined by uniform criteria will bolster the work to help treating physicians better select patients who qualify for active surveillance. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation Between Grade of Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer and Oncologic Outcomes in the Era of Watch-and-Wait.\",\"authors\":\"Roni Rosen, Aron Bercz, Dana Omer, Floris S Verheij, Hannah Williams, Parisa Malekzadeh, Danielle Kong, Felipe F Quezada-Diaz, Iris Wei, Maria Widmar, Georgios Karagkounis, Diana Roth O'Brien, Carla Hajj, Christopher Crane, Ping Gu, Neil H Segal, Marina Shcherba, Karuna Ganesh, Rona Yaeger, Emmanouil Pappou, Paul B Romesser, Garrett M Nash, Leonard B Saltz, Andrea Cercek, Martin R Weiser, Mithat Gonen, Philip B Paty, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, J Joshua Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The watch-and-wait strategy provides an opportunity to pursue non-operative management in rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The management of those with near complete response remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed the oncologic outcomes of patients managed by watch-and-wait versus total mesorectal excision according to clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Comprehensive cancer center in New York.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between January 2006 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A watch-and-wait strategy of active surveillance was offered to patients if they achieved clinical complete response. Salvage surgery was utilized for watch-and-wait patients with local regrowth. Patients with an incomplete response underwent total mesorectal excision.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Local regrowth rate, organ preservation rate, disease-free survival and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 1230) were divided into 3 response cohorts-incomplete (n = 646), near-complete (n = 189) and complete (n = 395). Eighty-one (43%) patients in the near-complete group and 351 (89%) patients in the complete group entered watch-and-wait. Three-year local regrowth rates were 40% and 24% in the near-complete and complete response cohorts, respectively. The 5-year organ preservation rate was 53% in near-complete responders, and 73% in complete responders. Five-year disease-free survival increased with greater clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy with intermediate outcomes noted for patients with a near-complete (73%) compared to complete (82%) or incomplete response (68%). Overall survival at 5 years was similar between the three cohorts (complete 90%, near-complete 86%, and incomplete 85%).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved oncologic outcomes. Near-complete responders may avoid surgery and still achieve high organ preservation rates yet experience greater local regrowth rates than clinical complete response patients. Ongoing prospective trials integrating watch-and-wait after complete response as determined by uniform criteria will bolster the work to help treating physicians better select patients who qualify for active surveillance. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察和等待策略为新辅助治疗后临床完全缓解的直肠癌患者寻求非手术治疗提供了机会。对接近完全缓解的患者的管理仍存在争议。目的:根据对新辅助治疗的临床反应,我们评估观察和等待与全肠系膜切除术患者的肿瘤预后。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:纽约综合癌症中心。患者:2006年1月至2020年12月诊断的直肠腺癌患者。干预措施:如果患者达到临床完全缓解,则提供主动监测的观察和等待策略。对于局部再生的患者,采用保留手术。不完全缓解的患者行全肠系膜切除术。主要观察指标:局部生长率、器官保存率、无病生存期和总生存期。结果:肛肠腺癌患者(n = 1230)分为3个应答队列:不完全(n = 646)、接近完全(n = 189)和完全(n = 395)。接近完全组81例(43%)患者和完全组351例(89%)患者进入观察等待状态。在接近完全缓解组和完全缓解组中,三年局部再生长率分别为40%和24%。近完全缓解者的5年器官保存率为53%,完全缓解者为73%。与完全缓解(82%)或不完全缓解(68%)相比,接近完全缓解(73%)的患者的中期结果表明,对新辅助治疗的临床反应更大,5年无病生存期增加。3个队列的5年总生存率相似(完全90%,接近完全86%,不完全85%)。局限性:回顾性。结论:对新辅助治疗的更好的临床反应与肿瘤预后的改善有关。与临床完全缓解的患者相比,接近完全缓解的患者可以避免手术,仍然获得较高的器官保存率,但局部再生率更高。正在进行的前瞻性试验整合了由统一标准确定的完全缓解后的观察和等待,这将有助于治疗医生更好地选择有资格进行主动监测的患者。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation Between Grade of Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer and Oncologic Outcomes in the Era of Watch-and-Wait.

Background: The watch-and-wait strategy provides an opportunity to pursue non-operative management in rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The management of those with near complete response remains controversial.

Objective: We assessed the oncologic outcomes of patients managed by watch-and-wait versus total mesorectal excision according to clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Settings: Comprehensive cancer center in New York.

Patients: Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between January 2006 to December 2020.

Interventions: A watch-and-wait strategy of active surveillance was offered to patients if they achieved clinical complete response. Salvage surgery was utilized for watch-and-wait patients with local regrowth. Patients with an incomplete response underwent total mesorectal excision.

Main outcome measures: Local regrowth rate, organ preservation rate, disease-free survival and overall survival.

Results: Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 1230) were divided into 3 response cohorts-incomplete (n = 646), near-complete (n = 189) and complete (n = 395). Eighty-one (43%) patients in the near-complete group and 351 (89%) patients in the complete group entered watch-and-wait. Three-year local regrowth rates were 40% and 24% in the near-complete and complete response cohorts, respectively. The 5-year organ preservation rate was 53% in near-complete responders, and 73% in complete responders. Five-year disease-free survival increased with greater clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy with intermediate outcomes noted for patients with a near-complete (73%) compared to complete (82%) or incomplete response (68%). Overall survival at 5 years was similar between the three cohorts (complete 90%, near-complete 86%, and incomplete 85%).

Limitations: Retrospective nature.

Conclusion: Greater clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved oncologic outcomes. Near-complete responders may avoid surgery and still achieve high organ preservation rates yet experience greater local regrowth rates than clinical complete response patients. Ongoing prospective trials integrating watch-and-wait after complete response as determined by uniform criteria will bolster the work to help treating physicians better select patients who qualify for active surveillance. See Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信