Frances Em Albers, Christopher Tv Swain, Makayla Wc Lou, S Ghazaleh Dashti, Sabina Rinaldi, Vivian Viallon, Amalia Karahalios, Kristy A Brown, Marc J Gunter, Roger L Milne, Dallas R English, Brigid M Lynch
{"title":"胰岛素和胰岛素样生长因子与绝经后雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的风险:一项病例队列分析","authors":"Frances Em Albers, Christopher Tv Swain, Makayla Wc Lou, S Ghazaleh Dashti, Sabina Rinaldi, Vivian Viallon, Amalia Karahalios, Kristy A Brown, Marc J Gunter, Roger L Milne, Dallas R English, Brigid M Lynch","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher concentration of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) increases postmenopausal breast cancer risk, but evidence for insulin and c-peptide is limited. Further, not all studies have accounted for potential confounding by biomarkers from other biological pathways, and not all were restricted to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a case-cohort study of 1,223 postmenopausal women (347 with ER-positive breast cancer) from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. We measured insulin, c-peptide, IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and biomarkers of inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone pathways. Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for ER-positive breast cancer per doubling plasma concentration and for quartiles, without and with adjustment for other, potentially confounding biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER-positive breast cancer risk was not associated with doubling of insulin (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.14) or c-peptide (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26). Risk appeared to decrease with doubling IGF-1 (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and IGFBP-3 (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.90). RRs were not meaningfully different when exposures were modelled as quartiles. RRs were less than unity but imprecise after adjustment for inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circulating insulin, c-peptide, and IGF-1 were not positively associated with risk of ER-positive breast cancer in this case-cohort analysis of postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Associations between insulin and c-peptide and risk of ER-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women are likely to be weak.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin and insulin-like growth factor and risk of postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a case-cohort analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Frances Em Albers, Christopher Tv Swain, Makayla Wc Lou, S Ghazaleh Dashti, Sabina Rinaldi, Vivian Viallon, Amalia Karahalios, Kristy A Brown, Marc J Gunter, Roger L Milne, Dallas R English, Brigid M Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher concentration of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) increases postmenopausal breast cancer risk, but evidence for insulin and c-peptide is limited. Further, not all studies have accounted for potential confounding by biomarkers from other biological pathways, and not all were restricted to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a case-cohort study of 1,223 postmenopausal women (347 with ER-positive breast cancer) from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. We measured insulin, c-peptide, IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and biomarkers of inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone pathways. Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for ER-positive breast cancer per doubling plasma concentration and for quartiles, without and with adjustment for other, potentially confounding biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER-positive breast cancer risk was not associated with doubling of insulin (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.14) or c-peptide (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26). Risk appeared to decrease with doubling IGF-1 (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and IGFBP-3 (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.90). RRs were not meaningfully different when exposures were modelled as quartiles. RRs were less than unity but imprecise after adjustment for inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circulating insulin, c-peptide, and IGF-1 were not positively associated with risk of ER-positive breast cancer in this case-cohort analysis of postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Associations between insulin and c-peptide and risk of ER-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women are likely to be weak.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1304\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insulin and insulin-like growth factor and risk of postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a case-cohort analysis.
Background: Higher concentration of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) increases postmenopausal breast cancer risk, but evidence for insulin and c-peptide is limited. Further, not all studies have accounted for potential confounding by biomarkers from other biological pathways, and not all were restricted to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer.
Methods: This was a case-cohort study of 1,223 postmenopausal women (347 with ER-positive breast cancer) from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. We measured insulin, c-peptide, IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and biomarkers of inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone pathways. Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for ER-positive breast cancer per doubling plasma concentration and for quartiles, without and with adjustment for other, potentially confounding biomarkers.
Results: ER-positive breast cancer risk was not associated with doubling of insulin (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.14) or c-peptide (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26). Risk appeared to decrease with doubling IGF-1 (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and IGFBP-3 (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.90). RRs were not meaningfully different when exposures were modelled as quartiles. RRs were less than unity but imprecise after adjustment for inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone biomarkers.
Conclusions: Circulating insulin, c-peptide, and IGF-1 were not positively associated with risk of ER-positive breast cancer in this case-cohort analysis of postmenopausal women.
Impact: Associations between insulin and c-peptide and risk of ER-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women are likely to be weak.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.