基于GDSC数据集的药物反应预测回归算法的比较分析。

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Soojung Ha, Juho Park, Kyuri Jo
{"title":"基于GDSC数据集的药物反应预测回归算法的比较分析。","authors":"Soojung Ha, Juho Park, Kyuri Jo","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-07026-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug response prediction can infer the relationship between an individual's genetic profile and a drug, which can be used to determine the choice of treatment for an individual patient. Prediction of drug response is recently being performed using machine learning technology. However, high-throughput sequencing data produces thousands of features per patient. In addition, it is difficult for researchers to know which algorithm is appropriate for prediction as various regression and feature selection algorithms exist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared and evaluated the performance of 13 representative regression algorithms using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset. Three analyses was conducted to show the effect of feature selection methods, multiomics information, and drug categories on drug response prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the experiments, Support Vector Regression algorithm and gene features selected with LINC L1000 dataset showed the best performance in terms of accuracy and execution time. However, integration of mutation and copy number variation information did not contribute to the prediction. Among the drug groups, responses of drugs related with hormone-related pathway were predicted with relatively high accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study can help bioinformatics researchers design data processing steps and select algorithms for drug response prediction, and develop a new drug response prediction model based on the GDSC or other high-throughput sequencing datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of regression algorithms for drug response prediction using GDSC dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Soojung Ha, Juho Park, Kyuri Jo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-024-07026-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug response prediction can infer the relationship between an individual's genetic profile and a drug, which can be used to determine the choice of treatment for an individual patient. Prediction of drug response is recently being performed using machine learning technology. However, high-throughput sequencing data produces thousands of features per patient. In addition, it is difficult for researchers to know which algorithm is appropriate for prediction as various regression and feature selection algorithms exist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared and evaluated the performance of 13 representative regression algorithms using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset. Three analyses was conducted to show the effect of feature selection methods, multiomics information, and drug categories on drug response prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the experiments, Support Vector Regression algorithm and gene features selected with LINC L1000 dataset showed the best performance in terms of accuracy and execution time. However, integration of mutation and copy number variation information did not contribute to the prediction. Among the drug groups, responses of drugs related with hormone-related pathway were predicted with relatively high accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study can help bioinformatics researchers design data processing steps and select algorithms for drug response prediction, and develop a new drug response prediction model based on the GDSC or other high-throughput sequencing datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"18 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-07026-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-07026-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物反应预测可以推断个体遗传特征与药物之间的关系,这可以用来确定个体患者的治疗选择。最近正在使用机器学习技术进行药物反应预测。然而,高通量测序数据产生每个患者数千个特征。此外,由于存在各种回归和特征选择算法,研究人员很难知道哪种算法适合于预测。方法:利用癌症药物敏感性基因组学(GDSC)数据集,对13种代表性回归算法的性能进行比较和评估。我们进行了三项分析,以显示特征选择方法、多组学信息和药物类别对药物反应预测的影响。结果:在实验中,使用LINC L1000数据集选择的支持向量回归算法和基因特征在准确率和执行时间方面表现最佳。然而,整合突变和拷贝数变异信息对预测没有帮助。在药物组中,与激素相关通路相关的药物反应预测准确率较高。结论:本研究可以帮助生物信息学研究人员设计药物反应预测的数据处理步骤和算法选择,并基于GDSC或其他高通量测序数据集建立新的药物反应预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of regression algorithms for drug response prediction using GDSC dataset.

Background: Drug response prediction can infer the relationship between an individual's genetic profile and a drug, which can be used to determine the choice of treatment for an individual patient. Prediction of drug response is recently being performed using machine learning technology. However, high-throughput sequencing data produces thousands of features per patient. In addition, it is difficult for researchers to know which algorithm is appropriate for prediction as various regression and feature selection algorithms exist.

Methods: We compared and evaluated the performance of 13 representative regression algorithms using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset. Three analyses was conducted to show the effect of feature selection methods, multiomics information, and drug categories on drug response prediction.

Results: In the experiments, Support Vector Regression algorithm and gene features selected with LINC L1000 dataset showed the best performance in terms of accuracy and execution time. However, integration of mutation and copy number variation information did not contribute to the prediction. Among the drug groups, responses of drugs related with hormone-related pathway were predicted with relatively high accuracy.

Conclusion: This study can help bioinformatics researchers design data processing steps and select algorithms for drug response prediction, and develop a new drug response prediction model based on the GDSC or other high-throughput sequencing datasets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信