对运动/(再)损伤的恐惧模型从灾难化顺时针运行:来自慢性非特异性腰痛门诊患者样本的证据。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Marco Monticone, Federico Arippa, Luca Frigau, Calogero Foti, Silvano Ferrari, Marco Guicciardi, Barbara Rocca
{"title":"对运动/(再)损伤的恐惧模型从灾难化顺时针运行:来自慢性非特异性腰痛门诊患者样本的证据。","authors":"Marco Monticone, Federico Arippa, Luca Frigau, Calogero Foti, Silvano Ferrari, Marco Guicciardi, Barbara Rocca","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the cognitive-behavioral model of fear of movement/(re)injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of 180 outpatients with chronic nonspecific low back pain who completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression, and a pain intensity numerical rating scale. The intercorrelations of the outcome measures were estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and regression analyses were used to examine their predictive values by following the left side of the fear of movement/(re)injury clockwise from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale ( P = 0.05). A postdictive analysis dichotomizing the sample into high- and low-level catastrophizers evaluated the effects of addressing catastrophizing on disability and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intercorrelations of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression and numerical rating scale were respectively r = 0.59, r = 0.54, r = 0.18, and r = 0.44. Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia significantly predicted Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression; and Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression significantly predicted numerical rating scale. The postdictive analysis showed that addressing catastrophizing reduces disability and pain experience by 14% in high-level catastrophizers and 86% in low-level catastrophizers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the fear of movement/(re)injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"506-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model of Fear of Movement/(Re)injury Runs Clockwise From Catastrophizing: Evidence From a Sample of Outpatients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Monticone, Federico Arippa, Luca Frigau, Calogero Foti, Silvano Ferrari, Marco Guicciardi, Barbara Rocca\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the cognitive-behavioral model of fear of movement/(re)injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of 180 outpatients with chronic nonspecific low back pain who completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression, and a pain intensity numerical rating scale. The intercorrelations of the outcome measures were estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and regression analyses were used to examine their predictive values by following the left side of the fear of movement/(re)injury clockwise from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale ( P = 0.05). A postdictive analysis dichotomizing the sample into high- and low-level catastrophizers evaluated the effects of addressing catastrophizing on disability and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intercorrelations of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression and numerical rating scale were respectively r = 0.59, r = 0.54, r = 0.18, and r = 0.44. Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia significantly predicted Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression; and Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression significantly predicted numerical rating scale. The postdictive analysis showed that addressing catastrophizing reduces disability and pain experience by 14% in high-level catastrophizers and 86% in low-level catastrophizers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the fear of movement/(re)injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"506-510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002659\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为巨灾化是运动/损伤恐惧(FAM)认知行为模型的引子提供证据。设计:对180例慢性非特异性腰痛门诊患者进行横断面分析,这些患者完成了疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)、Roland-Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ)、医院焦虑抑郁量表-抑郁量表(HADS-D)和疼痛强度数值评定量表(NRS)。使用Pearson相关系数(r)估计结果测量的相互相关性,并通过从PCS顺时针方向沿着FAM左侧进行回归分析来检验其预测值(p = 0.05)。将样本分为高灾难化者和低灾难化者的后置分析评估了解决灾难化对残疾和疼痛的影响。结果:PCS与TSK、RMDQ、HADS-D、NRS的相关系数分别为r = 0.59、r = 0.54、r = 0.18、r = 0.44。PCS是TSK的显著预测因子;PCS和TSK显著预测RMDQ和HADS-D;PCS、TSK、RMDQ和HADS-D显著预测NRS。事后分析表明,解决灾难化可以减少高水平灾难化患者14%的残疾和疼痛体验,在低水平灾难化患者中减少86%。结论:我们的研究结果证明灾难化是FAM的引物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model of Fear of Movement/(Re)injury Runs Clockwise From Catastrophizing: Evidence From a Sample of Outpatients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

Objective: The aim of the study is to provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the cognitive-behavioral model of fear of movement/(re)injury.

Design: A cross-sectional analysis of 180 outpatients with chronic nonspecific low back pain who completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression, and a pain intensity numerical rating scale. The intercorrelations of the outcome measures were estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and regression analyses were used to examine their predictive values by following the left side of the fear of movement/(re)injury clockwise from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale ( P = 0.05). A postdictive analysis dichotomizing the sample into high- and low-level catastrophizers evaluated the effects of addressing catastrophizing on disability and pain.

Results: The intercorrelations of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression and numerical rating scale were respectively r = 0.59, r = 0.54, r = 0.18, and r = 0.44. Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia significantly predicted Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression; and Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression significantly predicted numerical rating scale. The postdictive analysis showed that addressing catastrophizing reduces disability and pain experience by 14% in high-level catastrophizers and 86% in low-level catastrophizers.

Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that catastrophizing is the primer of the fear of movement/(re)injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信