急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的临床回顾--血管重建、机械循环支持及其他。

Circulation reports Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141
Yuichi Saito, Kazuya Tateishi, Yoshio Kobayashi
{"title":"急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的临床回顾--血管重建、机械循环支持及其他。","authors":"Yuichi Saito, Kazuya Tateishi, Yoshio Kobayashi","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Owing to recent advances in early reperfusion and pharmacological therapies, the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has considerably improved over the past decades. However, the mortality rate remains high at ~40-50% after AMI when complicated by cardiogenic shock. Although immediate coronary revascularization of the infarct-related artery has been the only evidence-based treatment, temporary mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump (Impella) has become another therapeutic option supported by randomized trial data in highly selected patients. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning clinical challenges in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"7 1","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond.\",\"authors\":\"Yuichi Saito, Kazuya Tateishi, Yoshio Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Owing to recent advances in early reperfusion and pharmacological therapies, the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has considerably improved over the past decades. However, the mortality rate remains high at ~40-50% after AMI when complicated by cardiogenic shock. Although immediate coronary revascularization of the infarct-related artery has been the only evidence-based treatment, temporary mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump (Impella) has become another therapeutic option supported by randomized trial data in highly selected patients. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning clinical challenges in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation reports\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"6-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于早期再灌注和药物治疗的最新进展,急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的预后在过去几十年中有了很大的改善。然而,AMI合并心源性休克后的死亡率仍高达40-50%。尽管立即冠状动脉血运重建是梗死相关动脉的唯一循证治疗方法,但微轴流泵(Impella)的临时机械循环支持已成为另一种治疗选择,在高度选定的患者中得到随机试验数据的支持。在这里,我们总结了有关AMI和心源性休克患者的临床挑战的最新证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond.

Owing to recent advances in early reperfusion and pharmacological therapies, the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has considerably improved over the past decades. However, the mortality rate remains high at ~40-50% after AMI when complicated by cardiogenic shock. Although immediate coronary revascularization of the infarct-related artery has been the only evidence-based treatment, temporary mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump (Impella) has become another therapeutic option supported by randomized trial data in highly selected patients. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning clinical challenges in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信