玫瑰心绞痛对中年女性有影响吗?来自皇家全科医师学院口服避孕药研究的进一步证据。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Katarzyna Galka , David J. McLernon , Philip C. Hannaford , Lisa Iversen
{"title":"玫瑰心绞痛对中年女性有影响吗?来自皇家全科医师学院口服避孕药研究的进一步证据。","authors":"Katarzyna Galka ,&nbsp;David J. McLernon ,&nbsp;Philip C. Hannaford ,&nbsp;Lisa Iversen","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Globally, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of death among women; however, disparities remain in the diagnosis and treatment of IHD between females and males. There is limited evidence about mortality risks among women with symptoms of IHD who remain undiagnosed. We re-examined the mortality risks in midlife women who completed the Rose Angina Questionnaire, among a subset of the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>8694 women in the cohort completed the Rose Angina Questionnaire, enquiring about symptoms of exertional chest pain, likely angina, and prior myocardial infarction. The women were followed for vital status and cause of death information until 30 June 2022. The relationship between different types of Rose angina and all-cause and cause-specific mortality was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After 27 years, 3263 (37.5 %) women had died. Compared with women who did not report symptoms, women with Rose angina had an increased risk of all-cause and IHD death. Women without a prior IHD diagnosis and grade II Rose angina at survey had the highest all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.55 to 2.97) and IHD-specific (aHR 3.18, 95 % CI 1.64 to 6.17) mortality risks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women reporting Rose chest pain had a higher risk of all-cause and IHD death, even in the absence of a prior IHD history. These findings highlight the importance of identifying symptomatic women in midlife, so their IHD risk can be managed appropriately by their healthcare providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51120,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 108189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Rose angina in midlife women matter? Further evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Galka ,&nbsp;David J. McLernon ,&nbsp;Philip C. Hannaford ,&nbsp;Lisa Iversen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Globally, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of death among women; however, disparities remain in the diagnosis and treatment of IHD between females and males. There is limited evidence about mortality risks among women with symptoms of IHD who remain undiagnosed. We re-examined the mortality risks in midlife women who completed the Rose Angina Questionnaire, among a subset of the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>8694 women in the cohort completed the Rose Angina Questionnaire, enquiring about symptoms of exertional chest pain, likely angina, and prior myocardial infarction. The women were followed for vital status and cause of death information until 30 June 2022. The relationship between different types of Rose angina and all-cause and cause-specific mortality was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After 27 years, 3263 (37.5 %) women had died. Compared with women who did not report symptoms, women with Rose angina had an increased risk of all-cause and IHD death. Women without a prior IHD diagnosis and grade II Rose angina at survey had the highest all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.55 to 2.97) and IHD-specific (aHR 3.18, 95 % CI 1.64 to 6.17) mortality risks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women reporting Rose chest pain had a higher risk of all-cause and IHD death, even in the absence of a prior IHD history. These findings highlight the importance of identifying symptomatic women in midlife, so their IHD risk can be managed appropriately by their healthcare providers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maturitas\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maturitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224002846\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224002846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在全球范围内,缺血性心脏病(IHD)是妇女死亡的主要原因;然而,女性和男性在诊断和治疗IHD方面仍然存在差异。有IHD症状但未被诊断的妇女死亡风险的证据有限。我们在皇家全科医师学院口服避孕药研究队列的一个子集中,重新检查了完成玫瑰心绞痛问卷的中年妇女的死亡风险。方法:8694名女性完成了玫瑰心绞痛问卷,询问了运动性胸痛的症状、可能的心绞痛和既往的心肌梗死。在2022年6月30日之前,对这些妇女进行了重要状况和死亡原因信息跟踪。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线、未校正和校正Cox回归分析不同类型玫瑰心绞痛与全因死亡率和病因特异性死亡率的关系。结果:27年后,3263例(37.5%)女性死亡。与没有报告症状的妇女相比,玫瑰心绞痛妇女的全因和IHD死亡风险增加。在调查中,没有IHD诊断和II级玫瑰心绞痛的女性具有最高的全因死亡风险(校正危险比[aHR] 2.14, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.55至2.97)和IHD特异性(aHR 3.18, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.64至6.17)。结论:报告玫瑰胸痛的妇女有更高的全因死亡和IHD死亡风险,即使没有IHD病史。这些发现强调了识别有症状的中年妇女的重要性,因此她们的卫生保健提供者可以适当地管理她们的IHD风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Rose angina in midlife women matter? Further evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study

Background and aims

Globally, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of death among women; however, disparities remain in the diagnosis and treatment of IHD between females and males. There is limited evidence about mortality risks among women with symptoms of IHD who remain undiagnosed. We re-examined the mortality risks in midlife women who completed the Rose Angina Questionnaire, among a subset of the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study cohort.

Methods

8694 women in the cohort completed the Rose Angina Questionnaire, enquiring about symptoms of exertional chest pain, likely angina, and prior myocardial infarction. The women were followed for vital status and cause of death information until 30 June 2022. The relationship between different types of Rose angina and all-cause and cause-specific mortality was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression.

Results

After 27 years, 3263 (37.5 %) women had died. Compared with women who did not report symptoms, women with Rose angina had an increased risk of all-cause and IHD death. Women without a prior IHD diagnosis and grade II Rose angina at survey had the highest all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.55 to 2.97) and IHD-specific (aHR 3.18, 95 % CI 1.64 to 6.17) mortality risks.

Conclusions

Women reporting Rose chest pain had a higher risk of all-cause and IHD death, even in the absence of a prior IHD history. These findings highlight the importance of identifying symptomatic women in midlife, so their IHD risk can be managed appropriately by their healthcare providers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maturitas
Maturitas 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Maturitas is an international multidisciplinary peer reviewed scientific journal of midlife health and beyond publishing original research, reviews, consensus statements and guidelines, and mini-reviews. The journal provides a forum for all aspects of postreproductive health in both genders ranging from basic science to health and social care. Topic areas include:• Aging• Alternative and Complementary medicines• Arthritis and Bone Health• Cancer• Cardiovascular Health• Cognitive and Physical Functioning• Epidemiology, health and social care• Gynecology/ Reproductive Endocrinology• Nutrition/ Obesity Diabetes/ Metabolic Syndrome• Menopause, Ovarian Aging• Mental Health• Pharmacology• Sexuality• Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信