评估创伤患者围手术期抗凝持续治疗对DVT/PE率的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Armarion Stegall, J. Tracy Watson, Heidi Israel
{"title":"评估创伤患者围手术期抗凝持续治疗对DVT/PE率的影响。","authors":"Armarion Stegall,&nbsp;J. Tracy Watson,&nbsp;Heidi Israel","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the United States, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) ranked high in terms of possibly preventable hospital deaths. Victims of trauma were at a higher risk of developing thromboembolic complications, and thus various agents were used for prophylaxis. Multiple studies recommended holding these agents in the perioperative period to decrease the potential complications of additional bleeding, wound issues, hematoma etc. However, the data regarding the timing and duration of withholding these agents was not consistent and at times surgeon specific. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of DVT/PE in trauma patients before and after a June 2022 policy intervention to operate through prophylactic anticoagulation at an academic trauma center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared DVT/PE rates in trauma patients requiring surgery prior to and following policy change at our institution. The query included charts from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2023. Clinical information relating to trauma date, surgery date, injury type, anticoagulant administration, DVT/PE development, and death, if applicable, was obtained from patient charts. We conducted a chi-square post hoc analysis to evaluate the incidence of DVT or PE before and after a policy change. The analysis focused on two categories: the presence or absence of DVT/PE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DVT/PE development was 14.553 times more likely pre-policy change when anticoagulation was held prior to surgery compared to post-policy change when anticoagulation was administered before surgery (X<sup>2</sup> (3, N = 374) =14.553, <em>p</em>=.002). Mortality related to DVT/PE showed no significant difference between pre-policy and post-policy groups (X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 374) = 0.130, <em>p</em> = .718). After excluding patients over age 65, analysis of MVA blunt trauma charts showed no statistical difference in blood transfusions pre policy v. post policy (X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 174) = 0.2198, <em>p</em> = .639).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings suggested that DVT/PE rates have significantly decreased post policy change without a significant increase in mortality and bleeding risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 112143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of perioperative anticoagulant continuation on DVT/PE rates in trauma patients\",\"authors\":\"Armarion Stegall,&nbsp;J. Tracy Watson,&nbsp;Heidi Israel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the United States, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) ranked high in terms of possibly preventable hospital deaths. Victims of trauma were at a higher risk of developing thromboembolic complications, and thus various agents were used for prophylaxis. Multiple studies recommended holding these agents in the perioperative period to decrease the potential complications of additional bleeding, wound issues, hematoma etc. However, the data regarding the timing and duration of withholding these agents was not consistent and at times surgeon specific. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of DVT/PE in trauma patients before and after a June 2022 policy intervention to operate through prophylactic anticoagulation at an academic trauma center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared DVT/PE rates in trauma patients requiring surgery prior to and following policy change at our institution. The query included charts from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2023. Clinical information relating to trauma date, surgery date, injury type, anticoagulant administration, DVT/PE development, and death, if applicable, was obtained from patient charts. We conducted a chi-square post hoc analysis to evaluate the incidence of DVT or PE before and after a policy change. The analysis focused on two categories: the presence or absence of DVT/PE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DVT/PE development was 14.553 times more likely pre-policy change when anticoagulation was held prior to surgery compared to post-policy change when anticoagulation was administered before surgery (X<sup>2</sup> (3, N = 374) =14.553, <em>p</em>=.002). Mortality related to DVT/PE showed no significant difference between pre-policy and post-policy groups (X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 374) = 0.130, <em>p</em> = .718). After excluding patients over age 65, analysis of MVA blunt trauma charts showed no statistical difference in blood transfusions pre policy v. post policy (X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 174) = 0.2198, <em>p</em> = .639).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings suggested that DVT/PE rates have significantly decreased post policy change without a significant increase in mortality and bleeding risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 112143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)在可能预防的医院死亡中排名靠前。创伤患者发生血栓栓塞并发症的风险较高,因此使用各种药物进行预防。多项研究建议在围手术期使用这些药物,以减少额外出血、伤口问题、血肿等潜在并发症。然而,关于保留这些药物的时间和持续时间的数据是不一致的,有时是针对外科医生的。本研究的目的是比较2022年6月在学术创伤中心通过预防性抗凝手术进行政策干预前后创伤患者DVT/PE的发生率。方法:我们比较了我院政策改变前后需要手术的创伤患者的DVT/PE率。该查询包括从2018年1月1日到2023年12月31日的图表。从患者图表中获得与创伤日期、手术日期、损伤类型、抗凝剂给药、DVT/PE发展和死亡(如果适用)相关的临床信息。我们进行了卡方事后分析来评估政策改变前后DVT或PE的发生率。分析集中在两类:有无DVT/PE。结果:术前抗凝治疗后DVT/PE发生改变的可能性是术前抗凝治疗后政策改变的14.553倍(X2 (3, N = 374) =14.553, p= 0.002)。手术前后DVT/PE相关死亡率差异无统计学意义(X2 (1, N = 374) = 0.130, p = .718)。在排除65岁以上患者后,对MVA钝性创伤图表进行分析,结果显示政策前与政策后输血量无统计学差异(X2 (1, N = 174) = 0.2198, p = 0.639)。结论:研究结果表明,政策改变后DVT/PE率显著降低,但死亡率和出血风险未显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the impact of perioperative anticoagulant continuation on DVT/PE rates in trauma patients

Introduction

In the United States, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) ranked high in terms of possibly preventable hospital deaths. Victims of trauma were at a higher risk of developing thromboembolic complications, and thus various agents were used for prophylaxis. Multiple studies recommended holding these agents in the perioperative period to decrease the potential complications of additional bleeding, wound issues, hematoma etc. However, the data regarding the timing and duration of withholding these agents was not consistent and at times surgeon specific. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of DVT/PE in trauma patients before and after a June 2022 policy intervention to operate through prophylactic anticoagulation at an academic trauma center.

Methods

We compared DVT/PE rates in trauma patients requiring surgery prior to and following policy change at our institution. The query included charts from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2023. Clinical information relating to trauma date, surgery date, injury type, anticoagulant administration, DVT/PE development, and death, if applicable, was obtained from patient charts. We conducted a chi-square post hoc analysis to evaluate the incidence of DVT or PE before and after a policy change. The analysis focused on two categories: the presence or absence of DVT/PE.

Results

DVT/PE development was 14.553 times more likely pre-policy change when anticoagulation was held prior to surgery compared to post-policy change when anticoagulation was administered before surgery (X2 (3, N = 374) =14.553, p=.002). Mortality related to DVT/PE showed no significant difference between pre-policy and post-policy groups (X2 (1, N = 374) = 0.130, p = .718). After excluding patients over age 65, analysis of MVA blunt trauma charts showed no statistical difference in blood transfusions pre policy v. post policy (X2 (1, N = 174) = 0.2198, p = .639).

Conclusion

Findings suggested that DVT/PE rates have significantly decreased post policy change without a significant increase in mortality and bleeding risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信