{"title":"不同类型温度计之间有什么区别?","authors":"Işıl Kübra Savaş, Gülsüm İclal Bayhan","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: There is no widely accepted method that can reflect the core temperature exactly. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of frequently used body temperature measurement methods. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 patients aged 3-9 years were included in this cross-sectional study. The body temperature was measured using a non-contact cutaneous thermometer (NCCT), tympanic thermometer (TT), temporal artery thermometer (TAT), and electronic oral thermometer. Four consecutive measurements each with a different technique were taken from each patient. The oral thermometer was accepted as the reference body temperature measurement method and an oral body temperature measurement of ≥37.8°C was accepted as fever. Results: The NCCT and TT provided lower body temperature results than the oral measurement, while the TAT measured body temperatures higher than the oral thermometer. In patients whose temperature was measured as <37.8°C orally, the oral and TT measurements showed a strong positive association, while the other methods showed a weak positive association with the oral thermometer. In patients with fever, the oral and TT, and the oral and NCCT had a strong positive association while the oral thermometer and TAT had a moderate positive association. The result provided by the ROC analysis that was performed to determine the fever cut-off value for NCCT was 37.4°C, 37.7°C for TT, and 38°C for TAT. Conclusion: None of the peripheral measurement methods can accurately measure the core temperature. However, the results can be interpreted more accurately if the characteristics of the thermometers are well known.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":"60 1","pages":"78-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Difference Between the Different Types of Thermometers?\",\"authors\":\"Işıl Kübra Savaş, Gülsüm İclal Bayhan\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective: There is no widely accepted method that can reflect the core temperature exactly. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of frequently used body temperature measurement methods. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 patients aged 3-9 years were included in this cross-sectional study. The body temperature was measured using a non-contact cutaneous thermometer (NCCT), tympanic thermometer (TT), temporal artery thermometer (TAT), and electronic oral thermometer. Four consecutive measurements each with a different technique were taken from each patient. The oral thermometer was accepted as the reference body temperature measurement method and an oral body temperature measurement of ≥37.8°C was accepted as fever. Results: The NCCT and TT provided lower body temperature results than the oral measurement, while the TAT measured body temperatures higher than the oral thermometer. In patients whose temperature was measured as <37.8°C orally, the oral and TT measurements showed a strong positive association, while the other methods showed a weak positive association with the oral thermometer. In patients with fever, the oral and TT, and the oral and NCCT had a strong positive association while the oral thermometer and TAT had a moderate positive association. The result provided by the ROC analysis that was performed to determine the fever cut-off value for NCCT was 37.4°C, 37.7°C for TT, and 38°C for TAT. Conclusion: None of the peripheral measurement methods can accurately measure the core temperature. However, the results can be interpreted more accurately if the characteristics of the thermometers are well known.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish archives of pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"78-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish archives of pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:目前还没有一种广为接受的方法能准确反映核心体温。本研究旨在调查常用体温测量方法的准确性。材料和方法:本横断面研究共纳入 104 名 3-9 岁的患者。使用非接触式皮肤温度计(NCCT)、鼓膜温度计(TT)、颞动脉温度计(TAT)和电子口腔温度计测量体温。每名患者使用不同的技术连续测量四次。以口腔温度计作为参考体温测量方法,口腔体温测量值≥37.8°C即为发热。结果:NCCT 和 TT 的体温测量结果低于口腔测量,而 TAT 的体温测量结果高于口腔温度计。体温测量结果为
What is the Difference Between the Different Types of Thermometers?
Objective: There is no widely accepted method that can reflect the core temperature exactly. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of frequently used body temperature measurement methods. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 patients aged 3-9 years were included in this cross-sectional study. The body temperature was measured using a non-contact cutaneous thermometer (NCCT), tympanic thermometer (TT), temporal artery thermometer (TAT), and electronic oral thermometer. Four consecutive measurements each with a different technique were taken from each patient. The oral thermometer was accepted as the reference body temperature measurement method and an oral body temperature measurement of ≥37.8°C was accepted as fever. Results: The NCCT and TT provided lower body temperature results than the oral measurement, while the TAT measured body temperatures higher than the oral thermometer. In patients whose temperature was measured as <37.8°C orally, the oral and TT measurements showed a strong positive association, while the other methods showed a weak positive association with the oral thermometer. In patients with fever, the oral and TT, and the oral and NCCT had a strong positive association while the oral thermometer and TAT had a moderate positive association. The result provided by the ROC analysis that was performed to determine the fever cut-off value for NCCT was 37.4°C, 37.7°C for TT, and 38°C for TAT. Conclusion: None of the peripheral measurement methods can accurately measure the core temperature. However, the results can be interpreted more accurately if the characteristics of the thermometers are well known.